819
8.0

借钱专家

导演:
黄靖华
主演:
周文健,江希文,莫少聪
别名:
未知
8.0
819人评分
国语
语言
1997-05-30
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  一个平庸的小市民“低B”,是一个十分普通的新闻记者,最近被同事好友陷害,炒股票,还欠下一身高利贷。某夜,他目睹绑匪二人互相残杀,发现了两百万美元的赌金。并偷了三四十万美金。更结交了一班损友。因妻子寂寞的绿故,而和酒醉大春在家中发生关系,不料低B带了二个美女回家过夜,最后,互相发现而起了争执,大春举起铁锤打向低B,另一方面警探阿超锲而不舍地追查低B,直至在逃的另一绑匪鬼影出现,低B坚决不承认偷走赎金,而妻子为了救低B,死在绑匪枪下,低B亦难逃被杀的命运……

猜你喜欢
换一换
出门挣钱的人
987
4.0
HD国语
出门挣钱的人
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:刘昌伟,方辉,陈佩斯,张雁,王显
简介:

  中文名出门挣钱的人
  导    演张郁强
  编    剧陈世濂
  上映时间1983年
  主 演:刘昌伟 王显 张雁 陈佩斯 方辉
  地 区:中国大陆
  颜 色:彩色
  类 型:剧情片
  青海某地生产队队长刘成业领着三个社员利用农闲出门挣钱。他们在途中意外地遇见了一群无主的羊群。面对羊群,青年农民尕顺提议住一天,等等失主;大保担心误了合同搞不成副业,队长刘成业同意尕顺的意见,马大爷也同意等上一天。但是,这一天非但没等到失主,反而遇上了大暴雨,四个人折腾了一夜,才算保住了这二百多头羊。因失主迟迟不来,刘成业产生卖掉羊挣一笔钱的打算,他到集镇卜摸清了卖羊的价钱。但却遭到马大爷的反对。尕顺找到一家藏民的羊圈,刘成业不得已同意把羊赶到藏民家养起来。刘成业要卖羊,尕顺要护羊,马大爷都看在眼里,但他不作声,因为他暂时还不知道怎么办更好。大保因这群羊耽误了搞副业的时间,赶了一部份羊去卖,尕顺发现后追上来,两人竞打了一架。合同眼看就要过期,失主无踪影,羊又卖不得,怎么办?马大爷也表示拖下去不是个事,刘成业见机会成熟,准备去问问农场,如果羊不是他们的,就下决心卖掉。后来,他找到曾经一起做过买卖的老桂,商谈羊价;但警车的轰鸣又使他警觉起来,告辞而去。贪财成性的老桂,跟着假冒失主找上了门,刘成业不但没揭露,反而向老桂索取了一大笔劳务费,老桂答应了他的所有条件,并加倍付了耽误合同的损失费一千元。藏族姑娘赛日措识破了老桂的阴谋诡计,揭穿了他的真实身份。顿时,真相大白。老桂见事败露,便把责任推到刘成业身上。刘成业悔悟自己做了不合法的事,勇敢地承认下来。尕顺大为失望,因为他十分信任刘成业。赛口措找来农场领导王主任,老桂被带走,王主任检查了自己的官僚主义作风,并十分感激这四位品格高尚的农民,为表彰他们,王主任代表农场向他们颁发了奖状。四位农民坚信,继续向前走,凭着我们的力气,一定能挣到钱。他们又赶着火车上路了。

36
1983
出门挣钱的人
主演:刘昌伟,方辉,陈佩斯,张雁,王显
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
搜索
719
5.0
HD
搜索
5.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:高圆圆,姚晨,赵又廷,陈红,王学圻,王珞丹,陈燃,张译,余皑磊,张大礼,马维福,杨青,霍青,谭松韵
简介:

  网络时代的“人肉”技术,通常是娱乐大众的利器,但很不幸,它也可能成为一种杀人工具。
  上市企业董事长秘书叶蓝秋(高圆圆 饰)在获知自己罹患癌症之后,心灰意冷的她上了一辆公交车,沉浸在惊愕与恐惧的她,拒绝给车上的老大爷让座,引起众议,这一过程被电视台实习记者杨佳琪(王珞丹 饰)用手机拍个正着。佳琪将公车上的新闻火速交给准嫂子陈若兮(姚晨 饰),凭着新闻主编的敏锐嗅觉,若兮将此新闻恶意放大,从而引发了一场社会大搜索,集体讨伐叶蓝秋的道德沦丧。在公众指责和病魔降临的夹缝中,叶蓝秋带着老板沈流舒(王学圻 饰)借给她的100万,彻底玩起了消失。岂料这更使她被冠以“小三”之名。若兮的摄影师男友无意中被卷入叶蓝秋的世界中,为了获得一笔高额报酬,他受雇陪伴在叶左右。而他却不曾想到,这竟是这个饱受指责的女人生命中最后一段时光。叶蓝秋的自杀,彻底颠覆了陈若兮的爱情与生活,也让所有人开始反思……

4410
2012
搜索
主演:高圆圆,姚晨,赵又廷,陈红,王学圻,王珞丹,陈燃,张译,余皑磊,张大礼,马维福,杨青,霍青,谭松韵
杏花村
890
10.0
HD中字
杏花村
10.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:李瑞芳,吴德,解冰,焦瑞霞,贺林
简介:

  八十年代初,一个春天的早晨,陕西某地的杏花村生产队里,锣鼓喧天,鞭炮齐鸣,生产队长冯二强为新房的落成举行庆祝仪式。这时,冯二强的哥哥冯大强却在为儿子根田结婚没有住房而发愁。大强认为除了厚着脸皮向二强借房以外别无他法。妻子文英坚决反对。大强又急又气,最后还是不听妻子的劝阻到二强家借房去了。结果,房没借成,反遭弟媳玉琴一顿尖酸刻薄的辱骂,气得原来住在二强家的老母冯大娘也含着泪水随大强走了。当时的杏花村,因为生产队长冯二强拒不实行生产责任制,整个生产队还是在吃大锅饭,而且越吃越穷。得到只是少数__QUOTE__灵虫虫__QUOTE__。为此,原县委书记、曾在杏花村蹲过点的韩云亭特来找二强商议解决的方法。韩云亭是二强的大舅,知道家中因借房而引起了风波,批评了二强。最后,二强不得不同意将新房中的一小间借给了根田、杏花办喜事。婚后第二天,玉琴借故当众大闹了一场,辱骂了杏花。杏花一气之下,跑回了娘家桃岭村。由此,根田、文英都责怪大强,说不该去低三下四地借房。大强抱怨自己没本事,拖累了孩子和家人。杏花经过思考,返回杏花村。正好韩云亭来宣布杏花村实行生产责任制的决定。大家满怀希望,干劲倍增,但二强等人却不肯善罢甘休。正当大强和乡亲们喜庆丰收,吃开园瓜的时候,牛铃奉二强指令宣布__QUOTE__全部农作物收归集体拉平分配__QUOTE__,又引起一场__QUOTE__瓜田风波__QUOTE__。二强在风波中丢了队长的职务。群众推举文英当队长,文英挑起了这副担子。韩云亭又以自身的经历,做二强的思想工作,使二强的思想发生了转变。文英不计前嫌,诚恳帮助二强,使二强一家人认识了错误,决心痛改前非。冯大娘一家人团聚了,杏花村的面貌改变了,人们高声欢唱党的富民政策,大家沿着党指引的道路继续前进。

1040
1983
杏花村
主演:李瑞芳,吴德,解冰,焦瑞霞,贺林
巴斯克维尔的猎犬夏洛克剧场版
717
2.0
HD中字
巴斯克维尔的猎犬夏洛克剧场版
2.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:藤冈靛,岩田刚典,新木优子,广末凉子,村上虹郎,涩川清彦,西村雅彦,山田真步,佐佐木藏之介,小泉孝太郎,稻森泉,椎名桔平
简介:

  电影描绘了电视剧版发生的故事之后,两人再次相遇,再一次作为搭档开始接受工作委托后的最初的案件。福尔摩斯研究家和福尔摩斯粉丝称为“夏洛克·福尔摩斯”系列史上最高杰作的长篇杰作《巴斯卡维尔的猎犬》的故事作为原案。
  日本屈指可数的资本家委托若宫为他搜寻女儿绑架未遂事件的犯人。但在那之后,资本家留下庞大的遗产,离奇地死去。为了探听资本家的死和绑架事件的真相,狮子雄和若宫降落在濑户内海的某个岛上。等待他们的是,一个一个都很难对付的华丽一族和奇怪的关系者们……和周围阻断的这个岛上,人们窃窃私语着传说中会袭击人的可怕魔犬的所作所为。连锁反应一样接二连三地发生了案件。复杂的人际关系和交错的现在与过去。这是不能打开的“潘多拉之盒”吗?同时若宫也面临着穷途末路的危机……这时候,狮子雄的决断是?这之后,两人终于抵达的可怕真相又是?

1782
2022
巴斯克维尔的猎犬夏洛克剧场版
主演:藤冈靛,岩田刚典,新木优子,广末凉子,村上虹郎,涩川清彦,西村雅彦,山田真步,佐佐木藏之介,小泉孝太郎,稻森泉,椎名桔平
相助
867
4.0
HD中字
相助
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:艾玛·斯通,维奥拉·戴维斯,布莱丝·达拉斯·霍华德,奥克塔维亚·斯宾瑟,杰西卡·查斯坦,阿娜·欧蕾利,艾莉森·珍妮,安娜·坎普,克里斯·劳威尔,西西莉·泰森,迈克·沃格尔,茜茜·斯派塞克,布莱恩·科尔文,约翰·威斯利·查特曼,安洁纽·艾莉丝,肖恩·麦克雷,苔拉李格斯,莱斯利·乔丹,玛丽·斯汀伯根,蒂凡尼·布劳威尔,Carol,Sutton,艾什莉·约翰逊,里奇·蒙哥马利,尼尔森·埃利斯,大卫·奥伊罗,La,Chanze,丹娜·爱薇,贝基·弗莱,Medgar,Evers,朱莉·安·多恩,约翰·肯尼迪,罗伯特
简介:

  上世纪60年代,在密西西比州,黑佣艾比里恩(维奥拉•戴维斯 Viola Davis 饰)勤勤恳恳照顾女主人的女儿,后者因产后抑郁症只顾与闺蜜贪欢。密西西比大学毕业生斯基特(艾玛•斯通 Emma Stone 饰)在报社负责家庭主妇信箱,并由此开始黑佣的生存状态。其中,希利(布莱丝•达拉斯•霍华德 Bryce Dallas Howard 饰)无疑是反面教材,她态度傲慢,对黑佣米妮(奥克塔维亚•斯宾瑟 Octavia Spencer 饰)抱有偏见,并力主黑佣不能与主人共用厕所。最终因不堪受辱,米妮愤然离去,并以牙还牙,假借道歉之机让她蒙羞。斯基特开始采访艾比里恩和米妮,希望了解黑佣的生存状态,并为自己的新书积累素材。与此同时,马丁路德金领导的平权运动正在如火如荼地开展,而斯基特所在的密西西比州正是斗争的前沿,因为黑人遭射杀的血案,种族隔离开始,一场肤色之争在所难免……

372
2011
相助
主演:艾玛·斯通,维奥拉·戴维斯,布莱丝·达拉斯·霍华德,奥克塔维亚·斯宾瑟,杰西卡·查斯坦,阿娜·欧蕾利,艾莉森·珍妮,安娜·坎普,克里斯·劳威尔,西西莉·泰森,迈克·沃格尔,茜茜·斯派塞克,布莱恩·科尔文,约翰·威斯利·查特曼,安洁纽·艾莉丝,肖恩·麦克雷,苔拉李格斯,莱斯利·乔丹,玛丽·斯汀伯根,蒂凡尼·布劳威尔,Carol,Sutton,艾什莉·约翰逊,里奇·蒙哥马利,尼尔森·埃利斯,大卫·奥伊罗,La,Chanze,丹娜·爱薇,贝基·弗莱,Medgar,Evers,朱莉·安·多恩,约翰·肯尼迪,罗伯特
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫