551
1.0

极速舰艇

导演:
Fred,Olen,Ray
主演:
麦克杜迪科夫,克里斯莱特
别名:
未知
1.0
551人评分
英语
语言
1999-06-08
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  美国海军医药官员杰克富勒奉命到一艘俄罗斯潜艇作善意访问。但是当他和他的同伴李特斯旺到潜艇之后,他们遭遇了一群恐怖分子,他们企图占领这艘潜艇并以核武器威胁杰克他们……究竟杰克他们能否战胜恐怖分子呢?

猜你喜欢
换一换
科莱特
895
4.0
HD中字
科莱特
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:伊里·马德尔,克蕾蒙丝·西尔莱,Juraj,Adamík,Radek,Balcárek,吉里·巴托斯卡,埃里克·鲍尔,Dan,Brown,Lubomir,Burgr,Václav,Chalupa,扬·茨纳,Michal,Dlouhý,Jeremi,Durand,Helena,Dvoráková,伊凡·弗拉内克,帕维尔·盖多斯,安德烈·赫里科,芭芭拉·科德托娃,翁德里·科瓦奇,苏珊娜·莫拉利,萨宾娜·罗伊科娃,Pavel,Rímský,Tomas,Sotak,Kristína,Svarinská,米罗斯拉夫
简介:

  本片根据卢斯蒂格的小说《一个来自安特卫普的女孩》改编。
  1973年,居住在纽约的捷克犹太作家威利·弗雷德知道儿子女朋友的母亲也曾被关押在奥斯维辛集中营,父子俩登门拜会,威利见到了苦寻三十年的集中营恋人科莱特·科恩,威利的记忆闸门再次被打开……
  1943年7月威利被转押到奥斯维辛·比克瑙集中营,不久比利时犹太女孩科莱特也被火车送来。威利在火车站台上叮嘱刚下车的科莱特要自称缝纫工,这使得科莱特免遭进毒气室。后来科莱特被分配去检查犹太人衣物中藏匿的贵重物品;威利则利用送取衣物之机偷偷在营内传递食品和药物,共同的命运使两人很快相恋了…
  比克瑙集中营司令官韦杰斯克凶残无比,动辄开枪杀人,任何违规行为都要当场处死,他也盯上了科莱特,软硬兼施占有了她…
  1944年9月,随着苏军的逼近,纳粹加紧执行对犹太人的“最终解决方案” ,剩下的犹太人将被转到豪森集中营。这时,科莱特怀孕了。威利好容易找到藏在往外运木材车上逃跑的机会,就在一切安排妥当之时,科莱特却因被韦杰斯克缠住未能及时赶到,为了心爱的人,威利放弃了这次机会。
  科莱特最终还是被押上了开往豪森集中营的火车,被解救后科莱特生下了韦杰斯克的女儿汉娜。
  1945年1月,威利在被转押途中遇到苏军,韦杰斯克因仍枪杀逃跑的囚犯而被愤怒的囚犯打死。战后威利四处寻找科莱特无果…
  剧中还描写了一批曾帮助过他俩的人:波兰医生大卫因知道科莱特怀孕而遭灭口;彪悍管理员弗里茨多次帮助威利;虽爱财但暗中帮助科莱特旳波兰女管理员布罗德因为帮科莱特搞到通行证被发现而被处死……

1196
2013
科莱特
主演:伊里·马德尔,克蕾蒙丝·西尔莱,Juraj,Adamík,Radek,Balcárek,吉里·巴托斯卡,埃里克·鲍尔,Dan,Brown,Lubomir,Burgr,Václav,Chalupa,扬·茨纳,Michal,Dlouhý,Jeremi,Durand,Helena,Dvoráková,伊凡·弗拉内克,帕维尔·盖多斯,安德烈·赫里科,芭芭拉·科德托娃,翁德里·科瓦奇,苏珊娜·莫拉利,萨宾娜·罗伊科娃,Pavel,Rímský,Tomas,Sotak,Kristína,Svarinská,米罗斯拉夫
新宿小偷日记
293
7.0
HD中字
新宿小偷日记
7.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:户浦六宏,佐藤庆,横尾忠则,横山真理子,Moichi,Tanabe,Tetsu,Takahashi
简介:

  新宿是东京仅次于银座的繁华地带,人口最为密集,充满了混乱气息。一天,突然有人大叫“小偷”,一群追赶的人们把小偷抓住,剥开衣服,只剩一条兜档布,腹部露出樱花纹身,追赶的人们都说“服了”,全都倒立起来,事件随即演变成“现场剧院”的表演宣传。一个叫鸟男的旁观者走进新宿车站附近的一间书店里,偷了几本性科学和人体美术书,被店员梅子扭送到老板处。鸟男在被抓时还在不断的偷,并说“我差一点就要射精了”,被抓后鸟男也丝毫没有认罪的态度。老板对鸟男偷书的选择很赏识,反而拿钱叫梅子陪鸟男上餐厅。两人一起看偷来的书,互相挑逗,当夜作爱,但很不成功。
  
  次日,两人请教性科学家,露骨的关于性爱的讨论和场面不断出现在银幕上,但两人兴趣索然。为刺激性欲,两人去偷看艺妓作爱,这些人为了帮助这两个缺乏性经验的男女,假装要强奸梅子,却假戏真做。深夜,梅子在书店把一本本有趣的书堆起来,每拿一本书,画面就出现作者的肖像,并朗读一段章节。后来。两个人加入了“现场剧院”的“期待扰乱戏剧”,梅子用月经模拟出剖腹的样子。此时,新宿街头的年轻人开始投掷石块。影片最后,反日共派的全日本学生自治会大联合的学生们在反战日袭击了新宿车站。

371
1969
新宿小偷日记
主演:户浦六宏,佐藤庆,横尾忠则,横山真理子,Moichi,Tanabe,Tetsu,Takahashi
双刃剑复活的男人
898
3.0
HD中字
双刃剑复活的男人
3.0
更新时间:07月03日
主演:织田裕二,小野花梨,津田健次郎,明日海里奥,细田善彦,影山优佳,和久井映见,音尾琢真,光石研
简介:

 一名大人物政治家的女儿遭人杀害,遗体在河滩被发现。她的嘴被胶带缠住,身上穿着被鲜血染得通红的白色连衣裙——这种惨烈的作案手法,与三年前“本应已经死去”的连环杀人犯马饲野隆一极为相似。鉴识课的中津川毅等人对现场采集到的嫌疑人毛发进行鉴定后,结果显示与三年前采集到的马饲野的毛发一致。负责指挥搜查本部的管理官国领克俊据此断定是马饲野所为,并宣布要“召回”某个男人。所谓“某个男人”,正是三年前事件中唯一与马饲野接触过的刑警——郡司孝介(织田裕二 饰)。他曾被称为“搜查一课的王牌”,破案数量遥遥领先,惹出的问题也同样数不胜数。然而,他在与马饲野接触的现场遭到刺伤,之后被调往辖区的生活安全课,如今不得不过着轮椅生活。虽然这是为了国领的升迁,但搜查一课系长富县纱荣子坚决反对召回郡司。即便郡司来到搜查一课,她也对他态度冷淡,但郡司并不在意。为了让坐轮椅的郡司也能前往案发现场,国领打算给他安排一名协助人员。郡司则提出,希望由自己在街上偶然遇到的搜查二课财务搜查官阿久都华瑠(小野花梨 饰)担任自己的支援搭档。然而,国领拒绝了这一提议。事实上,华瑠患有自闭症谱系障碍,他判断她很难应对既定日程之外的事情。但郡司看出了华瑠的能力与洞察力,仍不愿放弃,并对她说道:“你不是因为想在自己能做的工作里,选择最能帮助别人的事情,才成为警察的吗?”“如果你总是把房间的门打开,是因为内心想与外界保持联系的话,那就和我一起查案吧。”郡司的这番话打动了华瑠,她终于决定与郡司一起展开调查!郡司和华瑠随即开始调查被害者结衣的房间,并在书架后面发现了藏起来的华丽服装和假发。如果结衣还有不为人知的另一面,那么她或许并不符合马饲野一贯只挑选清纯女性作为目标的偏好。就在这样的疑问浮现时,华瑠注意到,捆绑被害者的绳结是由右撇子打出来的。而马饲野是左撇子,这就产生了矛盾。进一步调查还发现,案发现场留下的塑料瓶上的指纹也被不自然地擦拭过。然而,以纱荣子为首的搜查一课刑警们却不愿正视这些矛盾……?就在这时,又出现了新的被害者!这一次的案件中,也能看到与马饲野作案倾向相矛盾的地方。众人围绕“究竟是马饲野所为”,还是“模仿犯作案”产生分歧,而郡司与华瑠则逐渐接近了一个令人震惊的真相……!?

2244
2026
双刃剑复活的男人
主演:织田裕二,小野花梨,津田健次郎,明日海里奥,细田善彦,影山优佳,和久井映见,音尾琢真,光石研
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
神龙剑侠吕四娘
778
7.0
HD国语
神龙剑侠吕四娘
7.0
更新时间:06月16日
主演:高鸿萍,费安启,王志成,陈永霞,张德晖,张滨,尹铁光,王海生,李凤玲,张大鹏,刘利宁,张世发,何丽杰,尹华,夏恒吉,信群力,韩玉安
简介:

 清廷四品带刀侍卫马龙在官场失势,转而投到理藩院任职;背叛师父投靠敌人的王显落草为寇,无恶不作;吕四娘再度隐居避难。利欲熏心的马龙,为获得高官厚禄,不惜民族分裂疆士破碎,而效力于准噶尔部阿睦那撒亲王,参与其阴谋判乱,并受亲王派遗秘密护送联合东西蒙叛乱的“血密函”。乾隆皇帝有所觉察后,派重臣纳兰文德出京察访,却被王显一伙拦劫在山路上,幸得路过此地的吕四娘的阻止。不久,他们又在西瓜地里伏击了马龙一行,混战中,马龙抱着装有密函的宝匣只身逃走,并在当晚投宿到圆通寺。就在第二天清晨马龙准备离去时,被在此寺出家为僧的马师傅海空法师发现,为清理门户,海空法师与马龙展开一场恶斗。这时,仇英和吻妹及时赶来,他们打落马龙身上的宝匣,发现了密函。王显赶到,也被仇英和吻妹打得落荒而逃。马龙追上王显,要与他联手对付仇英和吻妹。受阿睦那撒亲王委派,暗中监视马龙的恶僧凌云子出现在马龙面前,当得知密函遗失后,马上追踪海空法师到沙漠上,两人展开了厮杀。吕四娘已暗中跟踪凌云子多时,关键时刻吕四娘突然出现,一举挫败了凌云子,救出海空法师,并与凌云子约定在千山一决胜负。仇英和吻妹为解开“密函”之谜,来到汤根庙找葛根大喇嘛。葛根大喇嘛解译密函后,劝仇英和吻妹将密函送往京师,报效国家。二人到千山找吕四娘,为维护祖国统一大业,吕四娘不计个人恩怨,命仇英和吻妹将血密函交给纳兰文德带回京师。同时,吕四娘在紫霞观设下“九宫八卦阵”,以逸待劳,在千山绝顶奕棋待敌。王显、马龙、凌云子先后来到千山,使出浑身解数也没逃出吕四娘之手。吕四娘与仇英、吻妹骑马而去。

4718
1989
神龙剑侠吕四娘
主演:高鸿萍,费安启,王志成,陈永霞,张德晖,张滨,尹铁光,王海生,李凤玲,张大鹏,刘利宁,张世发,何丽杰,尹华,夏恒吉,信群力,韩玉安
杏花村
890
10.0
HD中字
杏花村
10.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:李瑞芳,吴德,解冰,焦瑞霞,贺林
简介:

  八十年代初,一个春天的早晨,陕西某地的杏花村生产队里,锣鼓喧天,鞭炮齐鸣,生产队长冯二强为新房的落成举行庆祝仪式。这时,冯二强的哥哥冯大强却在为儿子根田结婚没有住房而发愁。大强认为除了厚着脸皮向二强借房以外别无他法。妻子文英坚决反对。大强又急又气,最后还是不听妻子的劝阻到二强家借房去了。结果,房没借成,反遭弟媳玉琴一顿尖酸刻薄的辱骂,气得原来住在二强家的老母冯大娘也含着泪水随大强走了。当时的杏花村,因为生产队长冯二强拒不实行生产责任制,整个生产队还是在吃大锅饭,而且越吃越穷。得到只是少数__QUOTE__灵虫虫__QUOTE__。为此,原县委书记、曾在杏花村蹲过点的韩云亭特来找二强商议解决的方法。韩云亭是二强的大舅,知道家中因借房而引起了风波,批评了二强。最后,二强不得不同意将新房中的一小间借给了根田、杏花办喜事。婚后第二天,玉琴借故当众大闹了一场,辱骂了杏花。杏花一气之下,跑回了娘家桃岭村。由此,根田、文英都责怪大强,说不该去低三下四地借房。大强抱怨自己没本事,拖累了孩子和家人。杏花经过思考,返回杏花村。正好韩云亭来宣布杏花村实行生产责任制的决定。大家满怀希望,干劲倍增,但二强等人却不肯善罢甘休。正当大强和乡亲们喜庆丰收,吃开园瓜的时候,牛铃奉二强指令宣布__QUOTE__全部农作物收归集体拉平分配__QUOTE__,又引起一场__QUOTE__瓜田风波__QUOTE__。二强在风波中丢了队长的职务。群众推举文英当队长,文英挑起了这副担子。韩云亭又以自身的经历,做二强的思想工作,使二强的思想发生了转变。文英不计前嫌,诚恳帮助二强,使二强一家人认识了错误,决心痛改前非。冯大娘一家人团聚了,杏花村的面貌改变了,人们高声欢唱党的富民政策,大家沿着党指引的道路继续前进。

1040
1983
杏花村
主演:李瑞芳,吴德,解冰,焦瑞霞,贺林
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫