674
3.0

门徒的眼泪

导演:
合民原,古阳
主演:
贾梓,戚芷嫣,冯家妹
别名:
未知
3.0
674人评分
国语
语言
未知
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  即使车速飙到了200码,李东学仍是没能赶得及阻止妻子被杀的命运。在与机敏躲过一劫的女儿娜娜泪眼相望过后,李东学对娜娜说:这里已经不是我们的家了,这只是一座冰冷的空房子。 树欲静而风不止是李东学所不愿意看到的。李东学想起那个晴空万里的春日,看着风中摇摆的树枝,他问师傅:是树枝在动,还是风吹动了它?师傅笑着回答说:动的既不是树枝,也不是风吹,而是你的思绪。 在没有理清仇家到底是谁的被动情势下,父女俩的逃亡之路注定危机重重。甚至荒郊野外投宿的一间普通客栈都早已设好了埋伏等着他们上钩。在清理了一连串的麻烦后,李东学敏感地嗅到了真正的危机正在一步步逼近自己和娜娜。所幸,娜娜的聪明伶俐以及与西餐厅老板娘的艳遇为他们的逃亡增添了几分温情。路遇小混混和汽车抛锚中途换车更是让娜娜重新认识到了一个全新的爸爸。娜娜说:爸爸你打架的样子好酷啊,我不小心看到了。李东学告诉娜娜:以后可不许打架,除非有人先欺负你。 虽然做好了万全之策,但仅凭一枚硬币的线索就找到父女俩行踪的乔的突然出现还是让李东学受了重伤。清理掉乔的追踪后,勉强支撑找到刘叔的李东学昏了过去。 在与刘叔的一翻对话以及对妻子的回忆中,所有的线索都指向了大哥吴作雄的弟弟吴作霖。李东学意识到,逃避终究不是解决问题的方法。将娜娜托付给刘叔之后,李东学含着泪返回了东城,开始了他的复仇之路。 李东学先是找到了麦海城询问吴作霖的下落,麦海城给了李东学一笔钱,建议他带着娜娜躲去江南好好过完下半生就算了。麦海城说:我们选择了这种生活就得过这种生活。临走,李东学注意到麦海城独酌的酒桌上却放着两个杯子。 去找阳哥帮忙实在是逼不得已。整个东城能和雄哥抗衡的,除了从不插手各公司具体事务的商会主席蓉姐,就只有阳哥了。但阳哥给李东学的答案是:过去的就让它过去吧,而且你单枪匹马,根本不可能成功。我希望你可以好好活着。 李东学没说话,看着阳哥,慢慢起身离开。就在李东学走出大门的同时,吴作霖从阳哥后面的大理石柱背后走了出来。 李东学是在山顶佛堂找到雄哥的。李东学问:你知道他背着你与其他人联系吗?他还想夺了你的权。雄哥低头叹息:他是我弟弟。我知道。李东学紧逼着说:吴作霖死路一条。雄哥望着远处的风景若有所思:我知道,很可能。但你是要求我,打开我弟弟的大门,让你用枪射穿他的脑袋,我做不到。李东学开车下山的时候,雄哥头部中弹,血汩汩的往外流。两个跟班也倒在血泊中。 螳螂捕蝉黄雀在后的杀招令阳哥和李东学都有些猝不及防。阴雨缠绵的午后,阳哥在接听到一个神秘电话过后,说出了吴作霖藏身的酒店。就在李东学成功突破三重防线和吴作霖当面对质的时候,一只黑洞洞的枪口早已瞄准了他…… 想到娜娜的瞬间,李东学莫名地记起暖秋的一个夜里,门徒突然起来痛哭。 师傅问他:你做噩梦了么? 没有。 一个伤心的梦? 不是。 门徒说:一个甜蜜的梦。 那你为什么哭的那么伤心? 门徒边擦眼泪,边小声地说:因为这只是梦,不是现实。 人物小传: 李东学 35岁左右,吴作雄的得力副手,在桀骜不驯的外表下,却有着一颗公平正直,充满柔情的心。本有退隐之意,奈何树欲静而风不止,在妻子被杀后,带着女儿娜娜开始了逃亡路上的温情与杀罚。 李娜娜 李东学的女儿,6岁左右,乖巧可爱,聪明善良。在机敏躲过灭门杀戮后与父亲李东学一起开始了逃亡之路,是李东学继续战斗下去的唯一精神支柱。 吴作雄 50岁左右,公司大哥,萌生了退隐之意,但没有到会引发严重的内乱,直至悲惨收场。 吴作霖 35岁左右,吴作雄的弟弟,人品才品远远不及其大哥,时有篡位之心,心狠手辣,总给大哥找麻烦。是李东学杀妻凶手的头号嫌疑人。 麦海城 40岁左右,吴作雄的军师,精于心计。在各方势力中游刃有余。 阳哥:45岁左右, 长相和蔼,人称笑面虎,是东城除吴作雄外最大的金主。掌握吴作霖的秘密。 詹美 29岁,李东学的妻子,娜娜的母亲,美丽大方,温柔善良,善解人意。她的被杀重新定位了李东学和娜娜之后的人生轨迹。 乔 35岁左右,帅气冷酷,职业杀手。李东学和娜娜逃亡路上的最大威胁。

猜你喜欢
换一换
新宿小偷日记
293
7.0
HD中字
新宿小偷日记
7.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:户浦六宏,佐藤庆,横尾忠则,横山真理子,Moichi,Tanabe,Tetsu,Takahashi
简介:

  新宿是东京仅次于银座的繁华地带,人口最为密集,充满了混乱气息。一天,突然有人大叫“小偷”,一群追赶的人们把小偷抓住,剥开衣服,只剩一条兜档布,腹部露出樱花纹身,追赶的人们都说“服了”,全都倒立起来,事件随即演变成“现场剧院”的表演宣传。一个叫鸟男的旁观者走进新宿车站附近的一间书店里,偷了几本性科学和人体美术书,被店员梅子扭送到老板处。鸟男在被抓时还在不断的偷,并说“我差一点就要射精了”,被抓后鸟男也丝毫没有认罪的态度。老板对鸟男偷书的选择很赏识,反而拿钱叫梅子陪鸟男上餐厅。两人一起看偷来的书,互相挑逗,当夜作爱,但很不成功。
  
  次日,两人请教性科学家,露骨的关于性爱的讨论和场面不断出现在银幕上,但两人兴趣索然。为刺激性欲,两人去偷看艺妓作爱,这些人为了帮助这两个缺乏性经验的男女,假装要强奸梅子,却假戏真做。深夜,梅子在书店把一本本有趣的书堆起来,每拿一本书,画面就出现作者的肖像,并朗读一段章节。后来。两个人加入了“现场剧院”的“期待扰乱戏剧”,梅子用月经模拟出剖腹的样子。此时,新宿街头的年轻人开始投掷石块。影片最后,反日共派的全日本学生自治会大联合的学生们在反战日袭击了新宿车站。

371
1969
新宿小偷日记
主演:户浦六宏,佐藤庆,横尾忠则,横山真理子,Moichi,Tanabe,Tetsu,Takahashi
鲛绡碧
122
1.0
HD国语
鲛绡碧
1.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:张博涵,徐源,卓熙,冷纪元,郑楠,费馨洁,张煜坤
简介:

  在长安暗无天日的毒霾中,柔弱美丽的鲛人漪下成为刑部侍郎车远山的男宠。他是真情,他却以为自己是假意。为了保护他,车远山出卖了漪下的姐姐漪柔。怀着恨意逃出长安的漪下,终于带着复仇的尖刀,再次回到车远山的面前……
  人物小传:
  车远山:男性,25岁左右、年轻的刑部侍郎,世代名门之后,外表英俊年轻有为,妻为丽阳公主深受皇帝及实力派皇子的信任负责捕获鲛人。但却深深地爱上了鲛人王子漪下,车的出场以硬汉形象示人其天性高傲、固执、少言寡语、做事雷厉风行。
  丽阳公主:女性,24岁左右、皇帝宠女,夫妻情深爱车胜过一切。端庄、温婉、大气、美丽,时刻透露出贵族气息,识大体。但内心刚强为爱不惜牺牲一切。
  漪下:男性,25岁左右、实际年龄180岁,鲛人国王子,国家发生动乱后与支持者流落中原,单纯善良执着是其最大的性格特点,拥有者世间少有的绝世美貌。
  龙骨离:男性,24岁左右、龙兽王子,控制鲛人国的大反派。龙人出售鲛人国的眼泪和棉织物给人类谋利进而使自己达到掌控鲛人国的目的,性格,阴险、狠毒、狡猾、贪婪,是他的内心。表面真诚、温和。
  韩王:男性,26岁左右、丽阳公主的哥哥,太子热门人选,娇宠的皇子,车远山儿时的玩伴,长大后因身份差距有了疏离。性格好色、耳根软、容易亲信谗言、没主见。
  岑孝:男性,25岁左右、车远山贴身助手、长相英俊帅气、对主人忠心耿耿、高智商。
  晚晴:女性,25岁左右、丽阳公主贴身丫鬟、长相漂亮、内心喜欢韩王、心思缜密但对丽阳公主很忠心。

529
2019
鲛绡碧
主演:张博涵,徐源,卓熙,冷纪元,郑楠,费馨洁,张煜坤
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
慢性
61
5.0
HD中字
慢性
5.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:比茜·图诺克,蒂姆·罗斯,玛莉贝丝·梦露,大卫·达斯马齐连,克莱尔·范·德·波姆,莎拉·萨瑟兰,塔特·艾灵顿,罗宾·巴特利特,迈克尔·克里斯托弗,乔·桑托斯,劳拉·尼米,卡丽·科尔曼,蕾切尔·皮卡普,内莉·诺温德
简介:

  神色有点忧郁的大卫(蒂姆·罗斯饰)是一个专门照顾重症病人的护士。他喂他们吃饭、替他们淋浴、帮助他们大小便, 做一些连最亲的亲人也不愿意干的事情。他是一个沉默寡言却很尽职的人,对病人的照料无微不至。病人过世后,他会感到很悲伤。而在参加病人的葬礼后,他又要开始找一个新病人,建立一段注定要以悲剧终结的关系。为了纾解精神上的压力,他天天跑步。大卫照顾的病人玛尔塔是一个癌症已经扩散、需要化疗的病人。最初她对大卫有些戒心,后来她从朋友那里得知大卫也有过一个患了末期癌症的儿子,才完全信任他。 当玛尔塔再也无法忍受化疗的严重副作用时,她要求大卫帮她安乐地死去。大卫一开始拒绝了她,但几经犹豫后改变主意,帮她完成了这个心愿。

4100
2015
慢性
主演:比茜·图诺克,蒂姆·罗斯,玛莉贝丝·梦露,大卫·达斯马齐连,克莱尔·范·德·波姆,莎拉·萨瑟兰,塔特·艾灵顿,罗宾·巴特利特,迈克尔·克里斯托弗,乔·桑托斯,劳拉·尼米,卡丽·科尔曼,蕾切尔·皮卡普,内莉·诺温德
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫