223
4.0

雾之旗

导演:
西河克己
主演:
山口百惠,三浦友和,三国连太郎,关口宏,加藤治子,原泉,石桥莲司,金田龙之介,儿岛美雪,小山明子,神山繁,夏夕介,大和田伸也,高桥昌也
别名:
未知
4.0
223人评分
日语
语言
1977-12-17
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  家住北九州小仓的柳田正夫(关口宏 饰)和桐子(山口百惠 饰)是一对父母早亡、自幼相依为命的苦命兄妹。某天,正夫被指控为一起抢劫杀人案的嫌疑人遭到逮捕,证据确凿的情况下,老实木讷的小学教师正夫百口莫辩。坚信哥哥清白的桐子辗转来到东京,拜访声名显赫的精英律师大冢钦三(三国连太郎 饰)为哥哥担任无罪辩护。眼里只认钱的大冢冷淡回绝了走投无路的桐子,这一幕刚好被《社会周刊》的记者阿部启一(三浦友和 饰)看在眼里。阿部帮桐子百般疏通,并竭力调查案件真相,却最终无法改变正夫被执行死刑的命运,桐子的人生也跌入谷底。与之相对,高高在上的大冢春风得意,恣意享受奢靡高贵的人生,却没意识到自己的命运也生活在底层的小人物所左右……
  本片根据推理作家松本清张的同名原作改编。

猜你喜欢
换一换
花楸故事
838
8.0
HD国语
花楸故事
8.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:杨太平,武斌,王小丹
简介:

  花楸村小学的老师王彩骑着他的小三轮从县上接回了他们村小学新来的支教老师谭文君。谭文君是省城的大学生,她的父母给她安排好了的工作被她拒绝了,她选择了到花楸支教。王彩带着谭文君介绍参观了他们的学校,并向孩子们介绍了他们的新老师,气氛非常融洽。 花楸村的甘老头是个做风筝的高手,更是个种茶的高手。村长带着闷葫芦为讨好甘老头做了只风筝送给他,但甘老头却不领情。 谭文君已经开始了她的教学生涯,村长代表村上接待了她,村长对这个与他年龄相仿,年轻漂亮的谭老师来到他们村上支教感到很是兴奋。谭老师与村长两个年轻人第一次见面之时的眼神碰撞也是多了一份尴尬。 王彩把自己的房间腾了出来给谭文君住,而他则回到了自己的老宅,老宅应很久没人住了,布满了蜘蛛网,也没有通电。谭文君住进了王彩老师的房间,从满墙的奖状才发现了王彩老师身上的故事。王彩一直默默无闻的在这个偏僻小村工作了一辈子,教育了一代又一代的人,这些都让文君很是感动。 谭文君与孩子们的相处非常融洽,她也开始融入了她的这个职业及新的生活。正在这个时候她的男朋友从省城过来看望她。带来了一些他的境况,一些生意上的得失。让文君感慨颇多。 文君父母也来看望她了,他们在城里找关系给文君安排了一个很好的工作,被文君拒绝。因为她已然舍不得这里的孩子们。而且面对村长、王彩他们的请求她也无法拒绝。 文君留下来了,给孩子带来了无比的欢乐。村长搞的种茶开发也有了一定的进展。而就在此时,王彩却也常年劳累留下的顽疾夺走了他的生命。 整个村都陷入了悲痛。谭文君更是。她以王彩为自己的精神向导,然而这一刻,她的精神却崩塌了。 村上举行的隆重的葬礼,悼念他们尊敬的王老师。谭文君的父母也来了。在沉重中,文君选择了留下接替王老师的信仰。她的父母也从内心里应允、认可了她。 葬礼过后,文君勤勤恳恳的带着整个村上的孩子们努力学习。村长跟闷葫芦也从甘老头那要到了种茶的秘方。 花楸村开始了他们新的生活。

5848
2010
花楸故事
主演:杨太平,武斌,王小丹
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
搜索
719
5.0
HD
搜索
5.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:高圆圆,姚晨,赵又廷,陈红,王学圻,王珞丹,陈燃,张译,余皑磊,张大礼,马维福,杨青,霍青,谭松韵
简介:

  网络时代的“人肉”技术,通常是娱乐大众的利器,但很不幸,它也可能成为一种杀人工具。
  上市企业董事长秘书叶蓝秋(高圆圆 饰)在获知自己罹患癌症之后,心灰意冷的她上了一辆公交车,沉浸在惊愕与恐惧的她,拒绝给车上的老大爷让座,引起众议,这一过程被电视台实习记者杨佳琪(王珞丹 饰)用手机拍个正着。佳琪将公车上的新闻火速交给准嫂子陈若兮(姚晨 饰),凭着新闻主编的敏锐嗅觉,若兮将此新闻恶意放大,从而引发了一场社会大搜索,集体讨伐叶蓝秋的道德沦丧。在公众指责和病魔降临的夹缝中,叶蓝秋带着老板沈流舒(王学圻 饰)借给她的100万,彻底玩起了消失。岂料这更使她被冠以“小三”之名。若兮的摄影师男友无意中被卷入叶蓝秋的世界中,为了获得一笔高额报酬,他受雇陪伴在叶左右。而他却不曾想到,这竟是这个饱受指责的女人生命中最后一段时光。叶蓝秋的自杀,彻底颠覆了陈若兮的爱情与生活,也让所有人开始反思……

4410
2012
搜索
主演:高圆圆,姚晨,赵又廷,陈红,王学圻,王珞丹,陈燃,张译,余皑磊,张大礼,马维福,杨青,霍青,谭松韵
杏花村
890
10.0
HD中字
杏花村
10.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:李瑞芳,吴德,解冰,焦瑞霞,贺林
简介:

  八十年代初,一个春天的早晨,陕西某地的杏花村生产队里,锣鼓喧天,鞭炮齐鸣,生产队长冯二强为新房的落成举行庆祝仪式。这时,冯二强的哥哥冯大强却在为儿子根田结婚没有住房而发愁。大强认为除了厚着脸皮向二强借房以外别无他法。妻子文英坚决反对。大强又急又气,最后还是不听妻子的劝阻到二强家借房去了。结果,房没借成,反遭弟媳玉琴一顿尖酸刻薄的辱骂,气得原来住在二强家的老母冯大娘也含着泪水随大强走了。当时的杏花村,因为生产队长冯二强拒不实行生产责任制,整个生产队还是在吃大锅饭,而且越吃越穷。得到只是少数__QUOTE__灵虫虫__QUOTE__。为此,原县委书记、曾在杏花村蹲过点的韩云亭特来找二强商议解决的方法。韩云亭是二强的大舅,知道家中因借房而引起了风波,批评了二强。最后,二强不得不同意将新房中的一小间借给了根田、杏花办喜事。婚后第二天,玉琴借故当众大闹了一场,辱骂了杏花。杏花一气之下,跑回了娘家桃岭村。由此,根田、文英都责怪大强,说不该去低三下四地借房。大强抱怨自己没本事,拖累了孩子和家人。杏花经过思考,返回杏花村。正好韩云亭来宣布杏花村实行生产责任制的决定。大家满怀希望,干劲倍增,但二强等人却不肯善罢甘休。正当大强和乡亲们喜庆丰收,吃开园瓜的时候,牛铃奉二强指令宣布__QUOTE__全部农作物收归集体拉平分配__QUOTE__,又引起一场__QUOTE__瓜田风波__QUOTE__。二强在风波中丢了队长的职务。群众推举文英当队长,文英挑起了这副担子。韩云亭又以自身的经历,做二强的思想工作,使二强的思想发生了转变。文英不计前嫌,诚恳帮助二强,使二强一家人认识了错误,决心痛改前非。冯大娘一家人团聚了,杏花村的面貌改变了,人们高声欢唱党的富民政策,大家沿着党指引的道路继续前进。

1040
1983
杏花村
主演:李瑞芳,吴德,解冰,焦瑞霞,贺林
巴斯克维尔的猎犬夏洛克剧场版
717
2.0
HD中字
巴斯克维尔的猎犬夏洛克剧场版
2.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:藤冈靛,岩田刚典,新木优子,广末凉子,村上虹郎,涩川清彦,西村雅彦,山田真步,佐佐木藏之介,小泉孝太郎,稻森泉,椎名桔平
简介:

  电影描绘了电视剧版发生的故事之后,两人再次相遇,再一次作为搭档开始接受工作委托后的最初的案件。福尔摩斯研究家和福尔摩斯粉丝称为“夏洛克·福尔摩斯”系列史上最高杰作的长篇杰作《巴斯卡维尔的猎犬》的故事作为原案。
  日本屈指可数的资本家委托若宫为他搜寻女儿绑架未遂事件的犯人。但在那之后,资本家留下庞大的遗产,离奇地死去。为了探听资本家的死和绑架事件的真相,狮子雄和若宫降落在濑户内海的某个岛上。等待他们的是,一个一个都很难对付的华丽一族和奇怪的关系者们……和周围阻断的这个岛上,人们窃窃私语着传说中会袭击人的可怕魔犬的所作所为。连锁反应一样接二连三地发生了案件。复杂的人际关系和交错的现在与过去。这是不能打开的“潘多拉之盒”吗?同时若宫也面临着穷途末路的危机……这时候,狮子雄的决断是?这之后,两人终于抵达的可怕真相又是?

1782
2022
巴斯克维尔的猎犬夏洛克剧场版
主演:藤冈靛,岩田刚典,新木优子,广末凉子,村上虹郎,涩川清彦,西村雅彦,山田真步,佐佐木藏之介,小泉孝太郎,稻森泉,椎名桔平
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫