363
3.0

暗恋桃花源

导演:
赖声川
主演:
林青霞,李立群,金士杰,丁乃筝,顾宝明,焦阳
别名:
未知
3.0
363人评分
国语
语言
1992-09-10
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  某剧场这晚迎来现代爱情悲剧《暗恋》和古装爱情喜剧《桃花源》两个不相干的剧组,因为都与之签定了当晚的彩排合约、又都是演出在即,双方发生争执只为独占唯一的舞台,结果谁都不愿相让只能间隔着排戏。
  现代悲剧里,江滨柳(金士杰)和云之凡(林青霞)在上海战乱时生出爱情,无奈一别竟是杳无音信大半生,江滨柳几十年来不间断的寻找云之凡从来无果,耄耋之年身患重病的他拿看似美满的家庭事业比对永藏在心间的对云之凡的单纯爱恋,只觉空落。古装喜剧中,武陵渔夫老陶(李立群)被妻子春花(丁乃筝)戴绿帽,每日受尽她及其情人袁老板(顾宝明)的欺辱,某日借口外出打鱼实为想自杀之时,误入桃花仙境,而春花与袁老板结为夫妻后,过的却是比原来更不堪的日子。
  一悲一喜两戏同台排练,摩擦和尴尬自是难免,却也意外成就了舞台奇观,这戏里出错或可有可无的幕布、道具,一场戏排练完毕留在台上的残迹,竟成那戏天然的一部分。而将两出戏连在一起的,尚有一个找寻某个男人的神情恍惚女子。

猜你喜欢
换一换
周恩来万隆之行
149
3.0
HD国语
周恩来万隆之行
3.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:王铁成
简介:

  1955年春天,中国政府受到亚非会议五个发起国的邀请,决定派出以周恩来总理为团长的中国政府代表团参加在印度尼西亚的万隆市举行的亚非会议。台湾特务得到情报开始密谋策划谋害周总理,周恩来总理受到缅甸总理吴努的邀请先期经昆明去缅甸首都仰光参加六国总理的会晤。这时从香港启德机场起飞的中国政府租用的印度“克什米尔公主号”飞机,被台湾特务密谋在飞往印尼途中炸毁,机上十一名中国代表团的先遣人员和外国记者全部遇难,举世震惊。面对纷纭复杂的国际形式和台湾特务的破坏,周恩来不顾个人的安危,决定按原计划继续乘坐印度飞机“空中霸王号”飞往印尼。印度尼亚的华侨们怀着极大的爱国热情为欢迎祖国的总理和代表团的到来做着各项筹备工作,以侨领麦公为首的华侨联合会为代表团捐车捐物,并且组成了各种服务小组。当周总理一行冒着重重危险抵达雅加达玛腰兰机场时,受到了当地群众和华侨的热烈欢迎,整个机场被围得水泄不通。
  亚非会议的召开,是二次大战后众多刚刚从殖民主义的统治下独立起来的亚非国家首脑的第一次聚会。美国政府也派出了一个庞大的所谓记者代表团参加了这次会议。在复杂的国际政治背景下,大家怀着良好的愿望而来,却又意见很不统一,一些代表对共产主义心存疑虑,提出苏联共产主义是一种新的殖民主义,也提出了华侨的双重国籍问题所可能造成的威胁。会议面临着失败的边缘。中国代表团的书面发言已经印发给大家,原来不准备再作大会发言,但面对这种情况,周恩来总理临时请求大会发言,他的“中国代表团是来讲团结的,不是来吵架的:中国代表团是来求同的,不是来立异的……”语惊四座。他的无比的真诚打消了与会代表的疑虑,也使亚非国家找到了共同团结的基础。在万隆会议期间,台湾特务组织了一个二十八人的敢死队铁血团,密谋杀害周总理,在印尼政府和华侨的保卫下他们的阴谋未能得逞。亚非会议期间,周恩来总理日理万机,利用一切机会广交朋友,七天时间他只睡了13个小时。经过周恩来、陈毅为首的中国政府代表团的努力,终于团结亚非代表确立了“和平共处五项原则”,使之成为以后国与国之间交往的基本准则,同时,也确立了新中国在纷纭复杂的国际政治舞台上不动摇的地位。

729
2003
周恩来万隆之行
主演:王铁成
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
午夜牛郎
963
10.0
HD中字
午夜牛郎
10.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:强·沃特,达斯汀·霍夫曼,西尔维娅·迈尔斯,约翰·麦盖沃,布伦达·瓦卡罗,巴纳德·休斯,鲁斯·怀特,詹妮弗·绍特,吉尔曼·兰金,琳达·戴维斯
简介:

  生活清贫的牛仔乔恩(乔恩·沃伊特 Jon Voight 饰)从老家来到纽约讨生活,他自认为风流倜傥,因此想在纽约当个男妓混口饭吃。当他第一天来到纽约时,就在大街上勾搭女人。不料,人地生疏的他生意不成反而亏了20块钱。沮丧不已的乔恩遇到了专靠骗点小钱为生的里佐(达斯汀·霍夫曼 Dustin Hoffman 饰),里佐骗乔恩说他认识一个男妓集团的首脑,但要收20元作为中介费。最后里佐只是把乔恩介绍给了一个同性恋的皮条客,愤怒不已的乔恩随后找到了里佐。里佐收留了无家可归的乔恩,两人渐渐成了无所不谈的好朋友。 寒冷的纽约冬天,两人过的十分辛酸,以至于衣食无着,里佐也没有钱买药治病
  里佐向往着迈阿密的生活,他邀请乔恩和他一起到迈阿密去闯世界。生活无着的两人这晚来到一家地下酒吧去碰运气,当乔恩终于搞到一单生意后,体力不支的里佐摔下了楼梯。奄奄一息的里佐此时最记挂的仍是迈阿密家乡的阳光,乔为了完成朋友的愿望,开始铤而走险。

3640
1969
午夜牛郎
主演:强·沃特,达斯汀·霍夫曼,西尔维娅·迈尔斯,约翰·麦盖沃,布伦达·瓦卡罗,巴纳德·休斯,鲁斯·怀特,詹妮弗·绍特,吉尔曼·兰金,琳达·戴维斯
战地之花
119
8.0
HD中字
战地之花
8.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:约翰·吉尔伯特,蕾妮·阿多莉,霍巴特·博斯沃恩,克莱尔·麦克道尔,克莱尔·亚当斯,罗伯特·奥伯,汤姆·奥布赖恩,卡尔·达内,罗西塔·马尔斯蒂尼
简介:

  第一次世界大战的末期,美国派兵赴欧洲参战,富家子弟吉姆(约翰·吉尔伯特 饰)也加入了军队,在部队中跟建筑工人出身的斯利姆和酒保布尔很快成为了好友。部队在法国登陆,驻扎在一个小村庄里。在那里,吉姆认识了法国村姑梅丽桑德(蕾妮·阿多莉 饰),两人很快燃起了爱火。不久,部队奉命开赴前线,吉姆被迫离去。梅丽桑德在军用卡车后紧追不舍,吉姆脱下军靴抛给她,表达自己对她的爱意。
  在前线,炮火密集,吉姆、斯利姆和布尔躲在炮弹坑中十分着急。经过抽签,由斯利姆冲出坑外对付敌人的大炮。炮声停止了,但斯利姆一直没有回来。吉姆十分担心,往敌阵中寻找,果然发现了斯利姆的尸体。
  美军进行大规模反攻,吉姆奋勇作战,结果因腿部中弹而住进野战医院。在那里,他听说梅丽桑德所在的村庄处境十分危险,于是偷偷溜出医院赶到村庄,却发现该地已成一片废墟……

544
1925
战地之花
主演:约翰·吉尔伯特,蕾妮·阿多莉,霍巴特·博斯沃恩,克莱尔·麦克道尔,克莱尔·亚当斯,罗伯特·奥伯,汤姆·奥布赖恩,卡尔·达内,罗西塔·马尔斯蒂尼
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫