197
4.0

光绪皇夜祭珍妃

导演:
刘芳
主演:
梁无相,余丽珍,林妹妹,半日安
别名:
未知
4.0
197人评分
粤语
语言
1952-09-11
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  电影剧情:
  光绪帝选后在即,属意于将军长叙次女珍儿。时清廷甫战败于日本,皆因军费为大权在握的慈禧太后挪用修建颐和园,光绪愤慨不已,常思变法图强。怎知大选当日,慈禧在权臣荣禄及宠监李连英协助下,幕后操纵,选立其侄女为皇后,珍儿屈居为妃,令光绪徒叹奈何。珍妃擅宠专房,深为皇后妒恨。一天,皇后请珍妃为她荐人,遭珍妃冷言相向,皇后于是往谒慈禧进谗,使珍妃当众受辱。光绪不甘再为傀儡,在珍妃的鼓励下,星夜密召直隶按察使袁世凯谋诛荣禄,再迫慈禧交出政权。讵料袁倒戈卖主,慈禧发动政变,将光绪幽禁瀛台,贬珍妃往北三所。冷宫之中,珍妃寂寞凄凉,光绪假扮太监前来偷会,才知八国联军已迫近京师。慈禧仓皇出逃之际,召见珍妃,要她劝光绪逃走,珍妃反责以大义,并坚劝光绪留京,慈禧一怒之下命人投珍妃于井中,光绪心如刀割。当他返京后于井畔夜祭,回首前尘,犹泪如雨下。
  影片花絮:
  该片是李少芸针对新马师曾制作的《光绪皇传》而拍的。李少芸曾因新马师曾没征求他同意采用他的曲本而闹上法庭。《帝苑春心化杜鹃》制片人之一袁德甫曾刊登启事一则,指《帝苑春心化杜鹃》其他两位制片人李少芸、谭伯叶未得袁德甫之同意,将该片任剑辉主唱之一段剪出,并插入该片中,故特登报声明。
  该片加插红伶何非凡、任剑辉、梁醒波、白玉堂、罗丽娟、罗剑郎、李慧仪的歌唱片段,包括任剑辉唱“帝苑春心化杜鹃”、梁醒波唱“担番口大雪茄”、罗丽娟唱“胜利曲”及群星合唱“锦绣前程”等。该片监制及原作者李少芸亦首度登银幕主唱“怨恨母后”。
  出品公司:大凤凰影片公司
  摄制公司:自由片场
  原著:李少芸
  导演:刘芳
  副导演(助理):陈云
  编剧:陈云;李少芸
  摄影:黄明
  剪辑:潘照
  道具:李棠
  灯光:汤榘
  录音:李柏坚
  剧务:赵英魂;钱基
  场记:谭嬣
  布景师:温文;李华
  监制:李少芸
  制片:谭伯叶
  摄影助理:余德
  音乐:吕文成;尹自重;林兆鎏;钱大叔;何大傻
  洗印:新艺电影冲印社
  撰曲:吴一啸
  录音助理:徐增宏
  布景制作:邝暖;杨援
  场务:罗森
  演员表:
  角色                           演员                            备注
  光绪皇梁无相----
  珍妃余丽珍----
  西太后林妹妹----
  荣禄半日安----
  李莲英                          许英秀                             ----
  隆裕梁瑞冰----
  袁世凯何少雄----
  王商张醒非----
  聂八十谭伯楷----
  联合主演:关仁;刘金凤;甘露;李慧仪;任剑辉;罗丽娟;梁醒波;白玉堂;何非凡;李少芸;秦小梨

猜你喜欢
换一换
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
巴斯克维尔的猎犬夏洛克剧场版
717
2.0
HD中字
巴斯克维尔的猎犬夏洛克剧场版
2.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:藤冈靛,岩田刚典,新木优子,广末凉子,村上虹郎,涩川清彦,西村雅彦,山田真步,佐佐木藏之介,小泉孝太郎,稻森泉,椎名桔平
简介:

  电影描绘了电视剧版发生的故事之后,两人再次相遇,再一次作为搭档开始接受工作委托后的最初的案件。福尔摩斯研究家和福尔摩斯粉丝称为“夏洛克·福尔摩斯”系列史上最高杰作的长篇杰作《巴斯卡维尔的猎犬》的故事作为原案。
  日本屈指可数的资本家委托若宫为他搜寻女儿绑架未遂事件的犯人。但在那之后,资本家留下庞大的遗产,离奇地死去。为了探听资本家的死和绑架事件的真相,狮子雄和若宫降落在濑户内海的某个岛上。等待他们的是,一个一个都很难对付的华丽一族和奇怪的关系者们……和周围阻断的这个岛上,人们窃窃私语着传说中会袭击人的可怕魔犬的所作所为。连锁反应一样接二连三地发生了案件。复杂的人际关系和交错的现在与过去。这是不能打开的“潘多拉之盒”吗?同时若宫也面临着穷途末路的危机……这时候,狮子雄的决断是?这之后,两人终于抵达的可怕真相又是?

1782
2022
巴斯克维尔的猎犬夏洛克剧场版
主演:藤冈靛,岩田刚典,新木优子,广末凉子,村上虹郎,涩川清彦,西村雅彦,山田真步,佐佐木藏之介,小泉孝太郎,稻森泉,椎名桔平
慢性
61
5.0
HD中字
慢性
5.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:比茜·图诺克,蒂姆·罗斯,玛莉贝丝·梦露,大卫·达斯马齐连,克莱尔·范·德·波姆,莎拉·萨瑟兰,塔特·艾灵顿,罗宾·巴特利特,迈克尔·克里斯托弗,乔·桑托斯,劳拉·尼米,卡丽·科尔曼,蕾切尔·皮卡普,内莉·诺温德
简介:

  神色有点忧郁的大卫(蒂姆·罗斯饰)是一个专门照顾重症病人的护士。他喂他们吃饭、替他们淋浴、帮助他们大小便, 做一些连最亲的亲人也不愿意干的事情。他是一个沉默寡言却很尽职的人,对病人的照料无微不至。病人过世后,他会感到很悲伤。而在参加病人的葬礼后,他又要开始找一个新病人,建立一段注定要以悲剧终结的关系。为了纾解精神上的压力,他天天跑步。大卫照顾的病人玛尔塔是一个癌症已经扩散、需要化疗的病人。最初她对大卫有些戒心,后来她从朋友那里得知大卫也有过一个患了末期癌症的儿子,才完全信任他。 当玛尔塔再也无法忍受化疗的严重副作用时,她要求大卫帮她安乐地死去。大卫一开始拒绝了她,但几经犹豫后改变主意,帮她完成了这个心愿。

4100
2015
慢性
主演:比茜·图诺克,蒂姆·罗斯,玛莉贝丝·梦露,大卫·达斯马齐连,克莱尔·范·德·波姆,莎拉·萨瑟兰,塔特·艾灵顿,罗宾·巴特利特,迈克尔·克里斯托弗,乔·桑托斯,劳拉·尼米,卡丽·科尔曼,蕾切尔·皮卡普,内莉·诺温德
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫