389
8.0

孤筏重洋

导演:
乔阿吉姆·罗恩尼,艾斯彭·山德伯格
主演:
帕尔·斯维尔·哈根,安德斯·巴斯莫·克里斯蒂安森,托拜厄斯·桑特尔曼,古斯塔·斯卡斯加德,奥德-马格努斯·威廉森,雅各布·奥福特布罗,阿格尼丝·基特尔森,彼得·怀特,霍·阿德里安·哈万,索伦·比尔马克,佩迪塔·埃弗里,伊恩,博纳,萨姆·查普曼,凯汀卡·埃格雷斯,理查德·特林德,曼努埃尔·考西,托德·博伊斯
别名:
未知
8.0
389人评分
其它
语言
2012-08-18
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  影片根据挪威著名探险家索尔·海尔达尔的真实经历改编,讲述他在1947年与五位朋友乘坐木筏漂流,穿越太平洋的传奇冒险故事。
  挪威迄今投资之最(1850万美元)的影片,根据真实事件改编,讲述了6名探险家乘坐简陋木筏横渡太平洋的故事。
  《祸水》的男星帕尔·斯维尔·瓦海姆·哈根扮演挪威著名探险家索尔·海尔达尔。
  1947年,索尔·海尔达尔与五位朋友一起从南美秘鲁出发,乘坐木筏历时101天和4900英里到达南太平洋波利尼西亚群岛,创造了人类航海史上的一项奇迹。他想通过此举证明,1400年前远古时代的秘鲁人就是通过乘坐这种简陋的木筏,穿越太平洋而到达波利尼西亚定居的。海尔达尔将这段艰苦卓绝的简历写成了书,被翻译成全世界60多种语言,拍成的纪录片也获得了1952年的奥斯卡最佳纪录片奖,他也被称为“世界上最著名的挪威人”。然而在故事的一开始,他的想法遭到了所有人的嘲笑。
  幕后制作
  《孤筏重洋》由挪威与英国、丹麦合拍,英方制片人是同贝托鲁奇合作过《偷香》、《末代皇帝》的Jeremy Thomas,他也是近期文德斯的《皮娜》、柯南伯格的《危险方法》等国际大制作的制片人。《孤筏重洋》将由乔阿吉姆·罗恩尼与艾斯彭·山德伯格指导,他们2008年在挪威成功地推出了卖座的战争爱情片《马克思·马努斯》,并是当年该国奥斯卡外语片申报代表。
  导演自述
  电影关于什么?
  传奇探险家海尔达尔的生平以及他在1947年乘坐简易的木筏穿越太平洋的真实故事。换句话说,这是一个关于永不放弃追逐梦想的故事。
  《孤筏重洋》的灵感来源?
  我们俩在挪威南部的一个小城长大,那里叫做桑德菲乔德。除了电影之外,我们从来没有别的追求,没有过其他的生活方式。但我们还是孩子的时候,《孤筏重洋》的故事就激励我们去追逐自己的梦想,无论是多么遥不可及的梦想并且永不放弃。我们希望这部电影也能够激励人们去冒险。去征服马特洪峰,去古巴航行,开体验66号公路,不管是什么,总之是追寻你的梦想。
  筹备过程中遇到过的最大困难?
  困难有很多,一开始简直是一团乱麻。这是我们所经历过的最为复杂的电影拍摄过程,幸运的是,在我们周围有很多了不起的人。
  拍摄过程中受到谁的影响?
  《大白鲨》,当然,它是有史以来最伟大的电影之一。我们不停地从八九十年代的电影中寻找灵感。在我们看来,那些年是电影的黄金时代。
  花絮
  .康提基(Kon-Tiki)号是根据印加人的太阳神神Viracocha的古名来命名。
  .影片背靠背地拍摄了两个版本,一个使用英文拍摄,另一个则使用挪威和丹麦文。
  .影片创下挪威影史上的投资之最(1850万美元)。
  .影片在挪威本地收入1334万美元票房,是2012年在挪威最卖座的影片,超过了所有好莱坞大片。
  .影片的两位导演乔阿吉姆·罗恩尼、艾斯彭·山德伯格是从小玩到大的好友。《孤筏重洋》是他们执导的第三部作品。他们的前一部《马克思马努斯》曾创下挪威十年来本土片的最高卖座纪录。

猜你喜欢
换一换
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫