45
4.0

穿越西伯利亚

导演:
布拉德·安德森
主演:
艾米莉·莫迪默,伍迪·哈里森,凯特·玛拉,本·金斯利,爱德华多·诺列加,托马斯·克莱舒曼
别名:
未知
4.0
45人评分
英语
语言
2008-01-18
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  美国夫妇罗伊(伍迪·哈里森 Woody Harrelson 饰)和杰西(艾米莉·莫迪默 Emily Mortimer 饰)坐火车从北京到莫斯科度假。在车上他们认识了西班牙小伙子卡洛斯(爱德华多·诺列加 Eduardo Noriega 饰)和美国姑娘艾比(凯特·玛拉 Kate Mara 饰)。当火车在西伯利亚小镇伊尔库茨克停留时,罗伊因贪恋观光而误了火车,卡洛斯和艾比决定与杰西在下站的伊兰斯基一同等待罗伊乘下班火车赶来。风流的卡洛斯很快便向杰西发起了追求攻势,使本来单纯的观光之旅变得复杂。而下一位与杰西夫妇同车厢的旅客竟是俄罗斯缉毒警官格林科(本·金斯利 Ben Kingsley 饰),随着事态越变越诡异,罗伊夫妇发现自己已深陷危机……
  本片获西班牙高迪奖最佳艺术指导和最佳电影剪辑奖及最佳摄影、最佳外语、最佳音效和最佳特效四项提名,并获美国科幻、幻象及恐怖电影协会土星奖最佳女主角(艾米莉·莫迪默)、最佳国际影片及最佳男配角(伍迪·哈里森)提名。

猜你喜欢
换一换
飞女刑事1987
817
9.0
HD中字
飞女刑事1987
9.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:南野阳子,伊武雅刀,蟹江敬三,长门裕之,内藤武敏,相乐晴子,坂上忍,杉本哲太
简介:

  『スケバン刑事』のタイトルで、テレビシリーズ終了後にその後日談という形で製作された。1987年2月14日、東映系にて公開。『スケバン刑事』シリーズとしては初の映画化作品となる。放映中のテレビシリーズ第3作『スケバン刑事III 少女忍法帖伝奇』のキャラクターも登場し、二代目サキ(陽子)と三代目サキ(風間唯)の共演などが話題となった。劇中後半に二代目サキが4倍の重量、16倍の破壊力を持つ「究極のヨーヨー」を使用する(右手で左手首を持ち、大きく反動を付けながら投げるのが特徴。その関係から陽子は右脇部にプロテクターを装着する。そして投げたヨーヨーはドリルのように回転する)。ヨーヨーという武器の特性上、使用者にも大きな負担が伴うという諸刃の剣を用いて自らも傷つきながら強大な敵と戦うのが見所となっている。 また、校長服部の正体がサイボーグという設定で、戦闘中に剥離した皮膚から金属製の内部を露出させた。メカ部分のデザインは出渕裕。同時上映は『カンフーキッド 好小子』。
  スタッフ

6453
1987
飞女刑事1987
主演:南野阳子,伊武雅刀,蟹江敬三,长门裕之,内藤武敏,相乐晴子,坂上忍,杉本哲太
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
续命之徒:绝命毒师电影
103
3.0
HD中字
续命之徒:绝命毒师电影
3.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:亚伦·保尔,乔纳森·班克斯,马特·琼斯,查尔斯·贝克,托德·特里,朱莉·珀尔,格雷戈里·史蒂文·索里兹,拉里·哈金,杰西·普莱蒙,汤姆·鲍尔,格洛里亚·桑多瓦尔,泰丝·哈珀,迈克尔·博夫舍维尔,丹妮尔·托德斯科,斯科特·麦克阿瑟,斯科特·,谢泼德,玛拉·吉布斯,罗伯特·福斯特,布兰登·萨克斯顿,戴维·马特,凯文·兰金,布莱恩·科兰斯顿,约翰尼·奥蒂斯,克里斯滕·里特
简介:

  Netflix 电视内容《续命之徒:绝命毒师电影》回归,主角杰西·平克曼(艾美奖得主亚伦·保尔饰演)再次与粉丝见面。杰西戏剧性地逃出囚禁后,他必须接受自己的过去,才有可能创造未来。这部扣人心弦的惊悚片由《绝命毒师》的创剧人文斯·吉里根编写和执导。该电影由马克·约翰逊、梅利莎·伯恩斯坦、查尔斯·纽沃斯、黛安娜·默瑟和亚伦·保尔以及 Sony Pictures Television 联合制作。

843
2019
续命之徒:绝命毒师电影
主演:亚伦·保尔,乔纳森·班克斯,马特·琼斯,查尔斯·贝克,托德·特里,朱莉·珀尔,格雷戈里·史蒂文·索里兹,拉里·哈金,杰西·普莱蒙,汤姆·鲍尔,格洛里亚·桑多瓦尔,泰丝·哈珀,迈克尔·博夫舍维尔,丹妮尔·托德斯科,斯科特·麦克阿瑟,斯科特·,谢泼德,玛拉·吉布斯,罗伯特·福斯特,布兰登·萨克斯顿,戴维·马特,凯文·兰金,布莱恩·科兰斯顿,约翰尼·奥蒂斯,克里斯滕·里特
我杀了我妈妈
20
6.0
HD中字
我杀了我妈妈
6.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:泽维尔·多兰,安娜·多尔瓦尔,弗朗索瓦·阿诺德,苏珊娜·克莱蒙,帕翠西卡·图拉斯内,尼尔斯·施内德,Monique,Spaziani,皮埃尔·查侬,Benoît,Gouin,雨果林·什维特·兰黛斯科,弗朗西斯·达查梅,Émile,Mailhiot,曼努尔·泰德罗斯,Bianca,Gervais
简介:

  不幸的童年经历让十六岁的少年于贝尔(泽维尔·多兰 Xavier Dolan 饰)早早过上了同母亲(安妮·杜尔瓦勒 Anne Dorval 饰)相依为命的生活,然而,随着年龄的增长和叛逆期的到来,于贝尔渐渐发现,自己和母亲之间开始变得越来越难以沟通,两人之间的距离渐行渐远 。
  内心充满了痛苦和矛盾,于贝尔开始了艰难的尝试,企图重塑他和母亲之间破裂的亲情与信任,可是,就在于贝尔的努力逐渐产生成效之时,他和同性男友安东尼(弗朗柯斯·阿诺德 François Arnaud 饰)之间的关系曝光了,这让他同母亲之间的关系再次回归了冰点之下。在安东尼的帮助下,于贝尔从寄宿学校出逃,偌大的天地之间,他能够寻找到一片得以藏身其中的小小天地吗?

3336
2009
我杀了我妈妈
主演:泽维尔·多兰,安娜·多尔瓦尔,弗朗索瓦·阿诺德,苏珊娜·克莱蒙,帕翠西卡·图拉斯内,尼尔斯·施内德,Monique,Spaziani,皮埃尔·查侬,Benoît,Gouin,雨果林·什维特·兰黛斯科,弗朗西斯·达查梅,Émile,Mailhiot,曼努尔·泰德罗斯,Bianca,Gervais
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫