878
4.0

画上结语

导演:
能年玲奈
主演:
能年玲奈,桃井薰
别名:
未知
4.0
878人评分
日语
语言
2019-12-11
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  《海女》主演のん(能年玲奈)制作了一部原创电影《おちをつけなんせ》,还拍了10集的花絮纪录片《I AM NON》。她亲自负责导演、主演、剧本、演出、服装、剪辑、音乐等,预告片反映出她在岩手县远野市为制作电影而奋斗的一年半。给予她灵感的电影人是枝裕和、片渊须直、桃井薰等也亮相了。
  10月2日,YouTube Japan官方频道将面向YouTube Premium收费会员一次性放出全话,同日起,每个周三都会免费公开一集。电影《おちをつけなんせ》将在最后上线。

猜你喜欢
换一换
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
西域响马
638
7.0
HD国语
西域响马
7.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:孙海英,李云娟,廖学秋
简介:

  一个月光惨淡的夜晚,西域响马头目杨剑飞带人袭击了一个部落。部落中的男女老少惨遭杀害。慕容艳等几个女武士因在外侥幸逃脱此厄运。她们发誓要向杨剑飞讨回血债,而官家也派西域名捕石雨带两名捕快追捕杨剑飞。 杨剑飞听说慕容艳杀了他的几个部下,似乎觉察到慕容艳在与他做对,但他却并不把一个女人放在眼里。 因慕容艳杀了不少人,官府限令石雨在10月内将慕容艳捕获。而石雨对此却不以为然,他认为一个女人作响马,肯定是被人逼迫出来的,况且那几个女人并没有为非作歹.所以他不去为难慕容艳。 慕容艳也听说了石雨,她从同族的一老人口中打听到石雨是侠心义胆的正派人.可她并不相信,她认为历来是“官匪一家”。 不久石雨找到慕容艳,但他并没有抓慕容艳,而且同意了慕容艳的建议:两人共同杀了杨剑飞,然后远离大漠。 在一家酒肆,石雨与杨剑飞不期而遇,双方交手,不分高低,打个平局。相约三日后再战。但是杨剑飞违约,提前行动,想趁石雨没有准备而取胜。幸亏慕容艳手下一个人给石雨送信,使他免遭暗算。石雨立即将此事告之慕容艳,提醒她提防心狠手辣的杨剑飞。 约定的时间到了,石雨和慕容艳来到杨剑飞的老巢。双方见面,一时间刀光剑影,飞沙走石,人喊马嘶。几经拼杀,慕容艳在石雨的帮助下,终于杀死了无恶不作的西域响马头目杨剑飞,报了深仇血恨。

147
1995
西域响马
主演:孙海英,李云娟,廖学秋
杏花村
890
10.0
HD中字
杏花村
10.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:李瑞芳,吴德,解冰,焦瑞霞,贺林
简介:

  八十年代初,一个春天的早晨,陕西某地的杏花村生产队里,锣鼓喧天,鞭炮齐鸣,生产队长冯二强为新房的落成举行庆祝仪式。这时,冯二强的哥哥冯大强却在为儿子根田结婚没有住房而发愁。大强认为除了厚着脸皮向二强借房以外别无他法。妻子文英坚决反对。大强又急又气,最后还是不听妻子的劝阻到二强家借房去了。结果,房没借成,反遭弟媳玉琴一顿尖酸刻薄的辱骂,气得原来住在二强家的老母冯大娘也含着泪水随大强走了。当时的杏花村,因为生产队长冯二强拒不实行生产责任制,整个生产队还是在吃大锅饭,而且越吃越穷。得到只是少数__QUOTE__灵虫虫__QUOTE__。为此,原县委书记、曾在杏花村蹲过点的韩云亭特来找二强商议解决的方法。韩云亭是二强的大舅,知道家中因借房而引起了风波,批评了二强。最后,二强不得不同意将新房中的一小间借给了根田、杏花办喜事。婚后第二天,玉琴借故当众大闹了一场,辱骂了杏花。杏花一气之下,跑回了娘家桃岭村。由此,根田、文英都责怪大强,说不该去低三下四地借房。大强抱怨自己没本事,拖累了孩子和家人。杏花经过思考,返回杏花村。正好韩云亭来宣布杏花村实行生产责任制的决定。大家满怀希望,干劲倍增,但二强等人却不肯善罢甘休。正当大强和乡亲们喜庆丰收,吃开园瓜的时候,牛铃奉二强指令宣布__QUOTE__全部农作物收归集体拉平分配__QUOTE__,又引起一场__QUOTE__瓜田风波__QUOTE__。二强在风波中丢了队长的职务。群众推举文英当队长,文英挑起了这副担子。韩云亭又以自身的经历,做二强的思想工作,使二强的思想发生了转变。文英不计前嫌,诚恳帮助二强,使二强一家人认识了错误,决心痛改前非。冯大娘一家人团聚了,杏花村的面貌改变了,人们高声欢唱党的富民政策,大家沿着党指引的道路继续前进。

1040
1983
杏花村
主演:李瑞芳,吴德,解冰,焦瑞霞,贺林
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫