506
8.0

芝加哥七君子审判

导演:
艾伦·索金
主演:
埃迪·雷德梅恩,艾利克斯·夏普,萨莎·拜伦·科恩,杰瑞米·斯特朗,约翰·卡洛·林奇,叶海亚·阿卜杜勒-迈丁,马克·里朗斯,约瑟夫·高登-莱维特,本·申克曼,J.C.麦肯泽,弗兰克·兰格拉,丹尼尔·弗莱厄蒂,诺亚·罗宾斯,约翰·道曼,迈克尔·基顿,小凯文·哈里森,凯特琳·菲茨杰拉德,茱丽叶·安吉洛,布伦丹·伯克,凯文·奥多奈尔,爱丽丝·克雷梅尔堡,拉里·米切尔,韦恩·杜瓦尔,迈克尔·布鲁里布,达米安·杨,米歇尔·赫斯特,马修·勒弗沃,克里斯蒂安·利特克,马克斯·阿德勒,肖恩·帕森,爱德华德·弗莱彻,C·J·
别名:
未知
8.0
506人评分
英语
语言
2020-09-25
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  1968 年民主党全国代表大会上的和平抗议演变成了与警察和国民警卫队的暴力冲突。抗议活动的组织者包括艾比·霍夫曼、杰里·鲁宾、汤姆·海登和鲍勃·席勒,他们被指控阴谋煽动暴乱,随之而来的审判是历史上最臭名昭著的几场审判之一。

猜你喜欢
换一换
史泰登岛国王
656
3.0
HD中字
史泰登岛国王
3.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:皮特·戴维森,蓓尔·波利,里奇·韦莱兹,卢·威尔逊,莫伊塞斯·阿里亚斯,卡莉·阿奎利诺,玛丽莎·托梅,茉德·阿帕图,罗伯特·维达尔三世,安格斯·科斯特洛,宝琳·查拉梅,琳恩·科普利兹,约瑟夫·保罗·肯尼迪,妮娜·赫尔曼,杰克·汉布林,凯文·考利甘,卢克·大卫·布鲁姆,比尔·伯尔,德里克·盖恩斯,Rich,Vos,史蒂夫·布西密,吉米·塔特罗,亚历克西斯·蕾·佛伦哲,多米尼克·隆巴多兹,拉斐尔·普里埃,帕梅拉·阿德龙,娜娜·门萨,机关枪凯利,安东尼·李·梅迪纳,罗伯特·斯密戈尔,Marilyn,Torres
简介:

  剧情灵感来自戴维森的真实生活,包括他那在911事件中去世的消防员父亲。主角为二十多岁的男子Scott,他跟妈妈住一起,梦想是当纹身师,但每天除了吸麻和朋友鬼混、暗暗勾搭青梅竹马之外无所事事。而妈妈找的新男友却引发了一系列事件,迫使开始Scott正视自己的人生。

462
2020
史泰登岛国王
主演:皮特·戴维森,蓓尔·波利,里奇·韦莱兹,卢·威尔逊,莫伊塞斯·阿里亚斯,卡莉·阿奎利诺,玛丽莎·托梅,茉德·阿帕图,罗伯特·维达尔三世,安格斯·科斯特洛,宝琳·查拉梅,琳恩·科普利兹,约瑟夫·保罗·肯尼迪,妮娜·赫尔曼,杰克·汉布林,凯文·考利甘,卢克·大卫·布鲁姆,比尔·伯尔,德里克·盖恩斯,Rich,Vos,史蒂夫·布西密,吉米·塔特罗,亚历克西斯·蕾·佛伦哲,多米尼克·隆巴多兹,拉斐尔·普里埃,帕梅拉·阿德龙,娜娜·门萨,机关枪凯利,安东尼·李·梅迪纳,罗伯特·斯密戈尔,Marilyn,Torres
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
飞行家
903
4.0
HD国语|中字
飞行家
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥,凯特·布兰切特,凯特·贝金赛尔,约翰·C·赖利,亚历克·鲍德温,阿伦·阿尔达,伊安·霍姆,丹尼·赫斯顿,格温·斯蒂芬妮,裘德·洛,亚当·斯科特,马特·罗斯,凯丽·加纳,弗兰西丝·康罗伊,布伦特·斯皮内,爱德华·赫曼,威廉·达福,肯尼斯·威尔什,J.C.麦肯泽,雅各布·戴维奇,艾米·斯洛安,山姆·亨宁斯,乔·克里斯特,洛福斯·温莱特,哈里·斯坦德乔夫斯基,文斯·佐丹奴,约希·麦兰,Justin,Shilton,亚瑟·霍尔顿,约瑟夫·莱迪,伊夫·雅克,卢顿·万恩怀特三世,杰森·卡弗利尔,
简介:

  本片依据Howard Hughes的生平改编。
  Howard Hughes(Leonardo DiCaprio 饰)出生于美国德州休士顿,18岁时,他继承父亲德州油井的财富,心怀电影梦想移居好莱坞。1926年他买入125家戏院的控制权,砸下数百万美金拍了实景空战史诗电影《地狱天使》,成为著名的制片人;1939年,他入主环球航空公司,他迅速使公司扭亏为盈,二战期间与美国军方合作,主持了蓝云杉飞机的发明和改进。
  Howard Hughes在事业上取得巨大成功的同时,他也饱受了忧郁症和精神官能强迫症的折磨;他的感情生活波折重重,Katharine Hepburn(Cate Blanchett 饰)、Ava Gardner(Kate Beckinsale 饰)先后离开他,让他备受打击。
  影片选取Howard Hughes重要的生活事件,真实地再现了他的传奇。

716
2004
飞行家
主演:莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥,凯特·布兰切特,凯特·贝金赛尔,约翰·C·赖利,亚历克·鲍德温,阿伦·阿尔达,伊安·霍姆,丹尼·赫斯顿,格温·斯蒂芬妮,裘德·洛,亚当·斯科特,马特·罗斯,凯丽·加纳,弗兰西丝·康罗伊,布伦特·斯皮内,爱德华·赫曼,威廉·达福,肯尼斯·威尔什,J.C.麦肯泽,雅各布·戴维奇,艾米·斯洛安,山姆·亨宁斯,乔·克里斯特,洛福斯·温莱特,哈里·斯坦德乔夫斯基,文斯·佐丹奴,约希·麦兰,Justin,Shilton,亚瑟·霍尔顿,约瑟夫·莱迪,伊夫·雅克,卢顿·万恩怀特三世,杰森·卡弗利尔,
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫