649
4.0

德国往事

导演:
山姆·贾巴尔斯基
主演:
莫里兹·布雷多,安婕·特拉乌,提姆·塞菲,马克·伊瓦涅,安纳托·陶布曼,帕尔·马可赛,约阿希姆·保罗·阿斯波克,乔尔·巴斯曼,杰夫·伯勒尔,塔妮娅·贾巴尔斯基,克里斯蒂安·米厄特克
别名:
未知
4.0
649人评分
其它
语言
2017-02-10
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  1946年的法兰克福,一群逃过纳粹大屠杀的犹太幸存者,梦想到美国重新展开生活。能言善道的大卫为此召集友人,准备趁此艰难时期,一展自己三寸不烂之舌的推销才华,狠狠海削德国人一笔。眼看资金即将筹足,光明未来也就在不远处,大卫却被怀疑是纳粹帮凶而被召去问讯调查,他把过去说得天花乱坠、天衣无缝,但一切究竟是为了摆脱嫌疑,还是掩饰阴影?
  德国名导山姆贾巴尔斯基继《洞里春光》后,又一部荒谬讽刺的社会喜剧。影片改编自德瑞小说家Michel Bergmann的作品,角色灵感源自作者亲友的亲身经历,深入刻划二战主题中鲜少被讨论的一群人──大屠杀过后仍居住在德国的犹太人们。面对战后人事全非的创伤,不悲情控诉,而豁达自嘲地以荒诞的德式幽默,回应难以被述说的辛酸历史。如果生活让人无法忍受,那么就用轻盈的谎言点缀它。

猜你喜欢
换一换
史泰登岛国王
656
3.0
HD中字
史泰登岛国王
3.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:皮特·戴维森,蓓尔·波利,里奇·韦莱兹,卢·威尔逊,莫伊塞斯·阿里亚斯,卡莉·阿奎利诺,玛丽莎·托梅,茉德·阿帕图,罗伯特·维达尔三世,安格斯·科斯特洛,宝琳·查拉梅,琳恩·科普利兹,约瑟夫·保罗·肯尼迪,妮娜·赫尔曼,杰克·汉布林,凯文·考利甘,卢克·大卫·布鲁姆,比尔·伯尔,德里克·盖恩斯,Rich,Vos,史蒂夫·布西密,吉米·塔特罗,亚历克西斯·蕾·佛伦哲,多米尼克·隆巴多兹,拉斐尔·普里埃,帕梅拉·阿德龙,娜娜·门萨,机关枪凯利,安东尼·李·梅迪纳,罗伯特·斯密戈尔,Marilyn,Torres
简介:

  剧情灵感来自戴维森的真实生活,包括他那在911事件中去世的消防员父亲。主角为二十多岁的男子Scott,他跟妈妈住一起,梦想是当纹身师,但每天除了吸麻和朋友鬼混、暗暗勾搭青梅竹马之外无所事事。而妈妈找的新男友却引发了一系列事件,迫使开始Scott正视自己的人生。

462
2020
史泰登岛国王
主演:皮特·戴维森,蓓尔·波利,里奇·韦莱兹,卢·威尔逊,莫伊塞斯·阿里亚斯,卡莉·阿奎利诺,玛丽莎·托梅,茉德·阿帕图,罗伯特·维达尔三世,安格斯·科斯特洛,宝琳·查拉梅,琳恩·科普利兹,约瑟夫·保罗·肯尼迪,妮娜·赫尔曼,杰克·汉布林,凯文·考利甘,卢克·大卫·布鲁姆,比尔·伯尔,德里克·盖恩斯,Rich,Vos,史蒂夫·布西密,吉米·塔特罗,亚历克西斯·蕾·佛伦哲,多米尼克·隆巴多兹,拉斐尔·普里埃,帕梅拉·阿德龙,娜娜·门萨,机关枪凯利,安东尼·李·梅迪纳,罗伯特·斯密戈尔,Marilyn,Torres
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
黑林鼓声
221
3.0
HD国语
黑林鼓声
3.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:郭建国,刘龙,张晓玲,杨秀章,曹橹
简介:

  1950年初,云南省哈尼族支系爱尼人聚居的爱尼山宣告解放。躲藏在原始森林中的窝古力匪帮,预感到末日即将来临,企图打出黑森林,与善良的爱尼人和__QUOTE__红汉人__QUOTE__拼个你死我活。联防队长扎格利奉解放军肖排长之命,离别爱妻兰娜和幼子小利戈,到山中客店去接一批枪支弹药,半路上遇到匪徒腊本都,两人展开了一场格斗,武功超群的扎格利生擒了腊本都。他从腊本都的口供中得知了敌人的信号,一个引匪山林,一网打尽的战斗方案产生了。猎手杜巴老爹的孙子果龙,协助扎格利转移枪支,在森林里遇到猛虎,慌忙躲避中又撞上狡猾的土匪多飘。果龙与多飘展开了一场格斗,最后双双倒在河滩上,扎格利暗中跟随土匪乔腊,摸清了窝古力匪帮的虚实。乔腊被窝古力打伤,扎格利背着受重伤的乔腊,闯到土匪庄铁的窝棚前,通知庄铁敲木鼓传窝古力的命令:明晨五更,林边集合。木鼓声回荡在整个大森林中,这鼓声是窝古力匪帮的丧钟,也是爱尼人胜利的角号。扎格利怀着兴奋、喜悦的心情,回到山寨。暮色中,他亲眼看到联防队副队长约墨打昏了前来与村中暗藏匪徒联系的土匪军师皮落。约墨大叔告诉扎格利一切都安排好了,扎格利便放心地踏着月色朝自己家走去。当他快步登上竹梯,正要跨入家门时,突然从暗中飞来一支毒剑,正中他的要害。扎格利强忍着剧痛向闻声而来的妻子兰娜口授了敌人的信号,说完便倒在平台上,为受尼人的幸福献出了年轻的生命。天色朦胧透亮,杜巴老爹与联防队员在龙巴门严阵以待。一名匪徒正欲放火焚烧龙巴门,忽被一支暗箭射中倒地。杜巴老爹抬头望去,见草丛中墨影一闪,杜巴老爹扬手投出标枪,黑影应声倒地。大家这才看清楚,窝古力藏在寨子里的耳目、杀害扎格利的凶手,正是联防队副队长约墨。一声枪响划破林中的寂静。窝古力匪帮听到信号,蠢蠢欲动。但他们还未跨出地盘,便被早已埋伏好的解放军消灭在山谷中。

1431
1985
黑林鼓声
主演:郭建国,刘龙,张晓玲,杨秀章,曹橹
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫