414
4.0

有希望的男人

导演:
伊力·维伊德雷克
主演:
杰里·马哈萨克,波莱克·波利夫卡,彼得拉·赫雷比科娃,维卡·克里克斯,西蒙娜·史达索娃
别名:
未知
4.0
414人评分
其它
语言
2011-08-25
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  都说忠诚和信任是维持婚姻的重要纽带,但卢德福(波莱克·波利夫卡 Bolek Polívka 饰)觉得这简直是一派胡言,在他的婚姻观里,不忠和出轨不仅能够增加婚姻里的趣味,更能给妻子制造危机感,令两人的关系因危机感而充满情趣。不知是巧合还是幸运,贯彻了这一套“歪理”的卢德 福自己的婚姻一直以来都幸福美满,这更让他坚信自己是正确的。
  卢德福的女儿爱丽丝(彼得拉·赫雷比科娃 Petra Hrebícková 饰)即将和名叫安德鲁(吉日·马察科 Jirí Machácek 饰)的男人步入婚姻的殿堂,让卢德福感到失望的是,安德鲁竟然打算当一个常人眼中的“模范丈夫”,心急如焚的卢德福决定从自己的女儿下手,希望爱丽丝能够向自己学习,学习他那一套维持婚姻之道。

猜你喜欢
换一换
鲛绡碧
122
1.0
HD国语
鲛绡碧
1.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:张博涵,徐源,卓熙,冷纪元,郑楠,费馨洁,张煜坤
简介:

  在长安暗无天日的毒霾中,柔弱美丽的鲛人漪下成为刑部侍郎车远山的男宠。他是真情,他却以为自己是假意。为了保护他,车远山出卖了漪下的姐姐漪柔。怀着恨意逃出长安的漪下,终于带着复仇的尖刀,再次回到车远山的面前……
  人物小传:
  车远山:男性,25岁左右、年轻的刑部侍郎,世代名门之后,外表英俊年轻有为,妻为丽阳公主深受皇帝及实力派皇子的信任负责捕获鲛人。但却深深地爱上了鲛人王子漪下,车的出场以硬汉形象示人其天性高傲、固执、少言寡语、做事雷厉风行。
  丽阳公主:女性,24岁左右、皇帝宠女,夫妻情深爱车胜过一切。端庄、温婉、大气、美丽,时刻透露出贵族气息,识大体。但内心刚强为爱不惜牺牲一切。
  漪下:男性,25岁左右、实际年龄180岁,鲛人国王子,国家发生动乱后与支持者流落中原,单纯善良执着是其最大的性格特点,拥有者世间少有的绝世美貌。
  龙骨离:男性,24岁左右、龙兽王子,控制鲛人国的大反派。龙人出售鲛人国的眼泪和棉织物给人类谋利进而使自己达到掌控鲛人国的目的,性格,阴险、狠毒、狡猾、贪婪,是他的内心。表面真诚、温和。
  韩王:男性,26岁左右、丽阳公主的哥哥,太子热门人选,娇宠的皇子,车远山儿时的玩伴,长大后因身份差距有了疏离。性格好色、耳根软、容易亲信谗言、没主见。
  岑孝:男性,25岁左右、车远山贴身助手、长相英俊帅气、对主人忠心耿耿、高智商。
  晚晴:女性,25岁左右、丽阳公主贴身丫鬟、长相漂亮、内心喜欢韩王、心思缜密但对丽阳公主很忠心。

529
2019
鲛绡碧
主演:张博涵,徐源,卓熙,冷纪元,郑楠,费馨洁,张煜坤
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
江分利满先生的优雅生活
434
5.0
HD中字
江分利满先生的优雅生活
5.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:小林桂树,新珠三千代,东野英治郎,杰瑞·伊藤,中丸忠雄,横山道代,平田昭彦,江原达怡,北明美,太刀川宽,山本廉,樱井浩子,柳川慶子,盐泽登代路,泽村伊纪雄,松村达雄,小川安三,堤康久,砂塚秀夫,天本英世,三条利喜江,东乡晴子,野村浩三,长谷川弘,中岛春雄
简介:

  原作は山口瞳の第48回直木賞受賞作。原作では主人公は電機メーカーに勤める宣伝部長だが、映画では洋酒メーカーの宣伝部員(山口瞳が当時サントリー宣伝部に勤めていた)に置き換え、主人公が直木賞を受賞するまでを描いている。それまで男性アクションで定評があった岡本喜八が、この1作で戦中派の屈折した心理を見事に捉え、本格的に評価された。ストーリーは、洋酒メーカーの宣伝部員というしがないサラリーマンの“才能のないだらしない奴が一生懸命生きること“の大変さを、自分史や戦後史と重ね合わせながら描く。岡本の演出は、主人公と妻との若い頃のロマンスを、「残菊物語」にたとえて、下駄と靴だけの合成アニメーションで描いたり、父親の事業の盛衰を書き割りのセットやアニメーションで描いたりと自由奔放をきわめる。また主人公の背後にいる同僚をストップモーションにして、カメラの背後でもう一人の自分が画面内の自分が置かれた立場を分析してみせるシーンなど、ナレーションの使い方も秀逸。

2075
1963
江分利满先生的优雅生活
主演:小林桂树,新珠三千代,东野英治郎,杰瑞·伊藤,中丸忠雄,横山道代,平田昭彦,江原达怡,北明美,太刀川宽,山本廉,樱井浩子,柳川慶子,盐泽登代路,泽村伊纪雄,松村达雄,小川安三,堤康久,砂塚秀夫,天本英世,三条利喜江,东乡晴子,野村浩三,长谷川弘,中岛春雄
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫