282
10.0

茜茜公主3

导演:
恩斯特·马里施卡
主演:
罗密·施耐德,卡尔海因茨·伯姆,玛格达·施奈德,古斯塔夫·克努特,乌塔·弗朗茨,沃尔特·雷耶尔
别名:
未知
10.0
282人评分
其它
语言
1957-12-19
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  奥地利年轻的皇后茜茜(罗密·施奈德 Romy Schneider 饰)遍访匈牙利,感受到这里的人民对她毫无政治性的热情,她深深地喜欢上了这个国家和人民,这也是唯一一种能让她逃离维也纳皇室生活压力的办法。然而,当她和安德森伯爵在匈牙利安抚不愿屈服的贵族时,皇太后苏菲(Vilma Degischer 饰)却在散布茜茜与伯爵之间的谣言。弗兰兹(卡尔亨兹·伯恩 Karlheinz Böhm 饰)一直埋头国事,任凭母亲苏菲去干预朝政,甚至包括女儿的抚养问题。当茜茜被诊断患有严重的肺结核病时,弗兰兹竟然依从母亲的意思让医生将女儿从茜茜身边带走。茜茜被送往遥远的岛上养病,孤独无助的她在母亲的精心呵护下,身体逐渐康复。茜茜病愈之后陪同弗兰兹前往意大利北部进行访问。那里的民族主义者们强烈地反对奥地利的统治,对整个王室表现出很大的敌意。但是,当茜茜和她的女儿在圣马可广场重聚时,意大利人民被善良的茜茜感化了,他们热情地欢迎她和女儿的团聚。

猜你喜欢
换一换
花楸故事
838
8.0
HD国语
花楸故事
8.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:杨太平,武斌,王小丹
简介:

  花楸村小学的老师王彩骑着他的小三轮从县上接回了他们村小学新来的支教老师谭文君。谭文君是省城的大学生,她的父母给她安排好了的工作被她拒绝了,她选择了到花楸支教。王彩带着谭文君介绍参观了他们的学校,并向孩子们介绍了他们的新老师,气氛非常融洽。 花楸村的甘老头是个做风筝的高手,更是个种茶的高手。村长带着闷葫芦为讨好甘老头做了只风筝送给他,但甘老头却不领情。 谭文君已经开始了她的教学生涯,村长代表村上接待了她,村长对这个与他年龄相仿,年轻漂亮的谭老师来到他们村上支教感到很是兴奋。谭老师与村长两个年轻人第一次见面之时的眼神碰撞也是多了一份尴尬。 王彩把自己的房间腾了出来给谭文君住,而他则回到了自己的老宅,老宅应很久没人住了,布满了蜘蛛网,也没有通电。谭文君住进了王彩老师的房间,从满墙的奖状才发现了王彩老师身上的故事。王彩一直默默无闻的在这个偏僻小村工作了一辈子,教育了一代又一代的人,这些都让文君很是感动。 谭文君与孩子们的相处非常融洽,她也开始融入了她的这个职业及新的生活。正在这个时候她的男朋友从省城过来看望她。带来了一些他的境况,一些生意上的得失。让文君感慨颇多。 文君父母也来看望她了,他们在城里找关系给文君安排了一个很好的工作,被文君拒绝。因为她已然舍不得这里的孩子们。而且面对村长、王彩他们的请求她也无法拒绝。 文君留下来了,给孩子带来了无比的欢乐。村长搞的种茶开发也有了一定的进展。而就在此时,王彩却也常年劳累留下的顽疾夺走了他的生命。 整个村都陷入了悲痛。谭文君更是。她以王彩为自己的精神向导,然而这一刻,她的精神却崩塌了。 村上举行的隆重的葬礼,悼念他们尊敬的王老师。谭文君的父母也来了。在沉重中,文君选择了留下接替王老师的信仰。她的父母也从内心里应允、认可了她。 葬礼过后,文君勤勤恳恳的带着整个村上的孩子们努力学习。村长跟闷葫芦也从甘老头那要到了种茶的秘方。 花楸村开始了他们新的生活。

5848
2010
花楸故事
主演:杨太平,武斌,王小丹
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
再塑一个我
652
10.0
HD国语
再塑一个我
10.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:雷鸣,王滨雁,方青卓,宫让,谭元元
简介:

  剧作家苏雨写的剧本《奋斗者》上演后,受到社会舆论的批评。他决定到生活中去调查研究,以证是非。在某法院,院长介绍他认识了审判员解稼芬,并让他以人民陪审员身份参与调解一起正在审理的离婚案。要求离婚者是中年雕塑家莫磊。莫磊的妻子叫池波,她在病床上含泪向苏雨诉说了他们家庭的变化:她和莫磊是雕塑系的同学,彼此相爱,曾发誓要以屈原的《九歌》为题材,雕塑出永留人间的艺术群像。她爱莫磊,更爱他的艺术才华,她承担起全部家务劳动,支持丈夫专心致志地进行创作。哪知莫磊成名后另寻新欢,家庭悲剧给池波带来无限的痛苦,但苏雨看到,他面前这位瘦弱的女性虽承受着不幸,却带着孩子坚强地挣扎着、奋斗着,并一心雕塑少年保护神--少司命,以实现年轻时和莫磊一起许下的诺言。苏雨还了解到第三者叫宁莉莉,是莫磊的学生和热情助手。她明知莫磊有妻子孩子,但并不认为自己的行为有什么错误,因为她对爱情有自己的观点,认为爱情不应该受什么条约和义务的约束。然而人们看到宁莉莉在她纺织的情网中很少有欢乐的时候。她忧虑地期待着莫磊,而莫磊又有难言之隐,始终没有答应她的要求,这使狂热的宁莉莉感到失望和伤心。法院的态度,道义的谴责,孩子的呼声,使他们双方陷入了痛苦的深渊。最后在解稼芬和苏雨的帮助下,尤其当池波从雕塑架上摔下,女儿因找爸爸落入湖中时,他们的感情受到强烈震动。莫磊悔悟了,带着愧疚的心情到医院看望了病中的妻子,宁莉莉终于发现此路不通,背上画夹,离开城市,走向新的生活。在审理这一案件中,苏雨本人实际上也是个被审者,因为在爱情和家庭问题上,他和莫磊在走着同一条路,所不同的只是远近而已都有了新的认识。他决心重新写一个剧本,并在家庭生活中弥补自己的过失。他意识到了一个作家的社会责任,一个丈夫对妻子、对女儿的家庭责任。他毅然否定了《奋斗者》,并陪同妻子到剧院观看了自己的新作《再塑一个我》。

550
1984
再塑一个我
主演:雷鸣,王滨雁,方青卓,宫让,谭元元
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫