189
3.0

拳道

导演:
苏炫阁
主演:
陈国坤,郭奕芯,刘峻纬,林嘉华,敖嘉年,黄文标,徐颖堃,黄泽锋,陈国邦,何华超,陈永尉
别名:
未知
3.0
189人评分
粤语
语言
2020-11-25
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  因為家貧,還要照顧雙眼接近失明的爸爸,十二歲的阿牛(陳國坤 飾)為了賺錢 在街上賣螢光棒,卻被一班惡霸拖到後巷拳打腳踢。 原來牛爸 (林嘉華 飾)當年為救好友興叔而被壞人弄傷雙眼,他失明後不想負累 一眾兄弟,所以便發放死訊,人間蒸發。興叔因不可以報答牛爸的救命之恩而 耿耿於懷多年年,現在陰差陽錯兄弟重逢,身為拳館師傅的興叔答應一定會把 阿牛教好,讓他成材。阿牛後來便正式拜師,視興叔如再生父親。 這個時候的阿牛亦悟出一個道理,就是拳術不用不活,加上他的性格抱打不平 ,故此每逢遇到有人受到欺凌,他都會出手幫助,把壞人當作活靶來來操練, 大快人心之餘,拳腳功夫亦趨更快、更狠、更準。 興叔年年事漸高,拳館的聲望大不如前,拳館收入不足以維持拳館。阿牛唯有 偷偷參加打黑拳,但是所有賽事加起來來的出場費和獎金都不足以維持拳館, 所以阿牛和小豬 (敖嘉年 飾)便決定去人工高,但工作卑卑賤的屠房工作。 有一次,小豬意外發現對頭拳館的陳標和兄弟斗牛梗 (劉峻緯 飾)等一幫人利用 生豬運毒,陳標得悉後便趁這機會報復阿牛多次打敗自己拳手,破壞名聲也影 響拳館生意。斗牛梗先巧言說服小豬,利利誘他在分得的甜頭後便可以讓爸爸 的拳館渡過 難關。小豬為了證明自己可以為拳館出力,竟然答應幫手運毒。 誰不知斗牛梗設下陷阱,讓小豬失手後便便以此作理理由將小豬毒打到不似人 形。 阿牛實在按不住心中的悲痛,決定去找陳標和斗牛梗算這筆賬。阿牛單人匹馬 殺上陳標的拳館,正想為友報仇,兩人決議在擂台上決一死戰最後,阿牛到底 怎樣以弱制強,以正義之心擊倒邪惡勢力,能以皇者的姿態,登上擂台迎戰……

猜你喜欢
换一换
夺虎连环计
588
5.0
HD国语
夺虎连环计
5.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:毛宏伟,王美玲,于承悦,凯文
简介:

  中文名夺虎连环计
  导    演石洗
  编    剧赵万堂 章柏青
  类    型剧情片
  主    演毛宏伟,王美玲 ,于承悦, 凯文
  上映时间1990年
  1913年初夏,约翰·鲁克逊率领“西洋幻术歌舞团”行进在通往古城的山路上。约翰是英国侵略军头目查理的儿子,当年查理从中国掠去半只铜虎。考证后发现另半只铜虎在明末宫廷侍卫官李碧云手中。只有将两个半只铜虎上的篆文合在一起,才能找到崇祯皇帝的秘密藏宝地。约翰正是秉承父意前来夺宝的。演出团行进途中,突然遭到两个青年的袭击。此二人正是那另外半只铜虎的保存者:李碧云的师兄施白墨的女儿秀女和李碧云的儿子何子孝。他们是来打探虚实的。演出团来到古城,县长王德才弄清了约翰此行目的后,心里也早有了盘算。武馆馆长旋白墨是李碧云夫妇被害后铜虎的保存者。他担心子孝、秀女报仇心切发生意外,便中断巡医赶回家中。约翰演出中故意亮出胸前的半铜虎。子孝他们不知是计,登台夺虎。子孝被约翰抓住。他死也不供出铜虎的下落。老奸巨猾的王德才劫走子孝,用药物使他说出了铜虎的秘密。约翰想用美人计拉拢王德才再抓回子孝,棋高一手的施白墨从王德才手中救回子孝。狡猾的约翰又生一计,扬苦返英。急于夺虎的秀女不听劝告落入约翰之手。危机中,旌白墨用假虎诱使王德才派汪彪救出秀女。用尽伎俩的约翰亮出底牌。旨诉王德才真虎还在自己的啕前。德才决定与约翰联手对付施白墨,然后杀掉约翰独吞珍宝。旌白墨对他们的勾结早有预料。他叮嘱子孝他们今后不管谁活着都要为国护宗。经过一场激烈的搏斗,终于使约翰落了个抛尸异国的可耻下场。在夺回国宝的激战中,秀女等人先后牺牲。何子孝终于为中华夺回了国宝铜虎。

220
1990
夺虎连环计
主演:毛宏伟,王美玲,于承悦,凯文
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
搜索
719
5.0
HD
搜索
5.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:高圆圆,姚晨,赵又廷,陈红,王学圻,王珞丹,陈燃,张译,余皑磊,张大礼,马维福,杨青,霍青,谭松韵
简介:

  网络时代的“人肉”技术,通常是娱乐大众的利器,但很不幸,它也可能成为一种杀人工具。
  上市企业董事长秘书叶蓝秋(高圆圆 饰)在获知自己罹患癌症之后,心灰意冷的她上了一辆公交车,沉浸在惊愕与恐惧的她,拒绝给车上的老大爷让座,引起众议,这一过程被电视台实习记者杨佳琪(王珞丹 饰)用手机拍个正着。佳琪将公车上的新闻火速交给准嫂子陈若兮(姚晨 饰),凭着新闻主编的敏锐嗅觉,若兮将此新闻恶意放大,从而引发了一场社会大搜索,集体讨伐叶蓝秋的道德沦丧。在公众指责和病魔降临的夹缝中,叶蓝秋带着老板沈流舒(王学圻 饰)借给她的100万,彻底玩起了消失。岂料这更使她被冠以“小三”之名。若兮的摄影师男友无意中被卷入叶蓝秋的世界中,为了获得一笔高额报酬,他受雇陪伴在叶左右。而他却不曾想到,这竟是这个饱受指责的女人生命中最后一段时光。叶蓝秋的自杀,彻底颠覆了陈若兮的爱情与生活,也让所有人开始反思……

4410
2012
搜索
主演:高圆圆,姚晨,赵又廷,陈红,王学圻,王珞丹,陈燃,张译,余皑磊,张大礼,马维福,杨青,霍青,谭松韵
杏花村
890
10.0
HD中字
杏花村
10.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:李瑞芳,吴德,解冰,焦瑞霞,贺林
简介:

  八十年代初,一个春天的早晨,陕西某地的杏花村生产队里,锣鼓喧天,鞭炮齐鸣,生产队长冯二强为新房的落成举行庆祝仪式。这时,冯二强的哥哥冯大强却在为儿子根田结婚没有住房而发愁。大强认为除了厚着脸皮向二强借房以外别无他法。妻子文英坚决反对。大强又急又气,最后还是不听妻子的劝阻到二强家借房去了。结果,房没借成,反遭弟媳玉琴一顿尖酸刻薄的辱骂,气得原来住在二强家的老母冯大娘也含着泪水随大强走了。当时的杏花村,因为生产队长冯二强拒不实行生产责任制,整个生产队还是在吃大锅饭,而且越吃越穷。得到只是少数__QUOTE__灵虫虫__QUOTE__。为此,原县委书记、曾在杏花村蹲过点的韩云亭特来找二强商议解决的方法。韩云亭是二强的大舅,知道家中因借房而引起了风波,批评了二强。最后,二强不得不同意将新房中的一小间借给了根田、杏花办喜事。婚后第二天,玉琴借故当众大闹了一场,辱骂了杏花。杏花一气之下,跑回了娘家桃岭村。由此,根田、文英都责怪大强,说不该去低三下四地借房。大强抱怨自己没本事,拖累了孩子和家人。杏花经过思考,返回杏花村。正好韩云亭来宣布杏花村实行生产责任制的决定。大家满怀希望,干劲倍增,但二强等人却不肯善罢甘休。正当大强和乡亲们喜庆丰收,吃开园瓜的时候,牛铃奉二强指令宣布__QUOTE__全部农作物收归集体拉平分配__QUOTE__,又引起一场__QUOTE__瓜田风波__QUOTE__。二强在风波中丢了队长的职务。群众推举文英当队长,文英挑起了这副担子。韩云亭又以自身的经历,做二强的思想工作,使二强的思想发生了转变。文英不计前嫌,诚恳帮助二强,使二强一家人认识了错误,决心痛改前非。冯大娘一家人团聚了,杏花村的面貌改变了,人们高声欢唱党的富民政策,大家沿着党指引的道路继续前进。

1040
1983
杏花村
主演:李瑞芳,吴德,解冰,焦瑞霞,贺林
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫