我和我的祖国

　　Won-sang虽然已大学毕业，但为了储钱只好出国进修，并到了一间出版社工作。出版社社长Yoon-shik已婚多年，仍经常拈花惹草，甚至向Won-sang的女友下手。  随着Won-sang与Yoon-shik接触日多，他对这名社长既尊敬又妒忌。后来Won-sang看上了报社中一名中年女摄影师Sung-yeon。Sung-yeon寂寞多年，亦视Won-sang为她在生命中重燃火花的希望。同时间，Won-sang因为工作需要须不时到Yoon-shik的家，却又搭上了Yoon-shik的妻子

　　1945年8月9日，美国向日本投下原子弹。就读医科大的青年浩二（二宫和也 饰）在毫无征兆的情况下死于非命。转眼三年过去，浩二的母亲福原伸子（吉永小百合 饰）似乎渐渐承认了儿子已不在人间的事实，她的丈夫、两个儿子皆已逝去，孤身一人在信仰的支撑下走过艰苦岁月。在某个夜晚，浩二突然在母亲身边现身。伸子喜出望外，和儿子热烈交谈。浩二不改善谈的个性，与妈妈有说有笑，当然他盘桓人间还有一个理由，那就是记挂情投意合的未婚妻佐多町子（黑木华 饰）。町子而今在某个小学担任教员，她念念不忘浩二，为此耽搁了自己的婚事。
　　死去的人，和活着的人，他们之间的羁绊依然紧密……

　　赌王雷天在赌术大赛中因对手“赌花”上官飞花（宫雪花 饰）出千而失利，心有不甘的雷天自杀身亡。雷天在警队中的好友华叔于公于私都有惩治上官飞花的理由，于是请犀牛皮（冯淬帆 饰）召集其他几位福星罗汉果（曾志伟 饰）、大山地（吴耀汉 饰）和花旗参（苗侨伟 饰）参加赌术特训，以期能够战胜上官飞花。雷天之女雷慧琳（冯秀燕 饰）及其替身也一同受训，鹧鸪菜（洪金宝 饰）因受伤不能参加委托少林僧人清补凉代替。众位福星在赌术老师（郑佩佩 饰）和千王（陈百祥 饰）的调教下进步神速。华叔见时机已到，派出众福星和雷慧琳内应外合盗出上官飞花财产，并通过新一届赌术大赛要上官飞花身败名裂……

靠打零工在城市里艰难生活的小周遇到了迷路的阿玉，小周跟踪阿玉并偷走阿玉的钱包后被一群流氓打伤倒在路边。同样生活艰难的小华今天被炒了鱿鱼，回家路上遇到倒在路边的小周，便将小周带回了家，细心照料。三个陌生人因此产生了联系，在熟悉又陌生的城市中，他们的人生正在悄悄的发生着转变。 《你好！再见》2018年获第十届美国国际独立电影节IndieFEST Film Award剧情类长片成就奖、导演成就奖、男主角成就奖；入围意大利PRISMA独立电影节；美国Festigious国际电影节终评最佳影片奖提名。

　　The film is about the early years of famed children’s author Astrid Lindgren (Pippi Longstocking) when she experienced something that was a “combination of both miracle and calamity that came to shape her entire life.”

　　安德烈和史蒂芬是一对人人称羡的同志情侣，同为交响乐队成员的他们于公于私都形影不离，爱猫摩西则是家中第三位成员，突如其来的暴力举动却令完美人生瞬间瓦解，他们也因随之而来的猜忌和疏离渐行渐远，史蒂芬企图挽回安德烈冷漠以对的心，两个霎时被掏空的灵魂，要如何找回坚持下去的决心？
　　演而优则导的克劳斯韩铎第二部编导长片，以奥地利电影向来见长的冷静犀利，表现角色暗潮汹涌的心理状态，意想不到的情节转折，以及深具象徵意味的安排，自始至终凝聚高度张力，深刻描绘爱情令人完整又捉摸不定的本质，一个人为爱牺牲的极限为何？救赎能否换来原谅？爱能令人欣喜若狂，也能叫人痛彻心扉，如同一隻猫时而与人亲近，时而不见踪影。

　　Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
　　These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
　　Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
　　Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
　　Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
　　Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
　　Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
　　Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
　　Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
　　Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
　　Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
　　Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
　　Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
　　Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
　　Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
　　Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
　　Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
　　Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
　　Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
　　Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
　　Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
　　Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

　　丈（余文乐 饰）是香港深水区的一名放蛇警察，作为底层的警察，丈整日与一个难得见光的世界打交道，这里充斥着暴力、毒品，是社会阴暗的一个角落。要想在这里生存，丈不仅要学会如何做警察，更需要学习黑道的生存法则，渐渐地丈的身份越来越模糊，他生活在黑与白之间的灰色地带。Lulu（冼色丽 饰）是这一区的妓女，丈与之保持着来往，却始终没有将关系向前推进。一次意外，丈误杀小头目四眼堂（廖启智 饰），神秘杀手（樊少皇 饰）是唯一目击者，为了自保，丈和神秘杀手展开了一场追逐……杀手背后有怎样的秘密？丈是否能够逃过此劫？《青苔》为我们展现了社会阴暗处的小人物们如何似青苔一般生存。

　　本片以时局动荡的五代十国时期为背景，讲述了杨继业和佘太君年轻时候的故事：后汉末年，皇位空缺、番邦异动；西北第一要塞麟州城内人人崇武重信，为护送晋商出陕，麟州杨家屡遭暗算，营救途中，得知此人就是当今储君。为稳定中原之势，边塞重镇与契丹拼死力博，虎口救君……

　　2年前，科幻小说家大卫·戈登（约翰·库萨克 John Cusack 饰）遭受了丧妻之痛，时间并未抚平他心中的伤口，反倒令其愈感空虚。为了排遣心中的孤独，大卫决定收养一个小孩，当然这个决定遭到周围亲友的质疑和反对。不顾他人的意见，大卫领养了名叫丹尼斯（鲍比·科尔曼 Bobby Coleman 饰）的小男孩。丹尼斯虽然清秀可爱，性格却非常古怪。他自称来自火星，终日躲在纸盒子里，不与其他小朋友玩耍，喜欢用没有胶卷的相机拍照。丹尼斯的到来为大卫的生活注入活力，也为他带来久违的爱情。而随着生活的继续，大卫却发现与火星男孩的相处实非易事……
　　本片根据David Gerrold的获奖科幻短篇小说改编。

童安是一位儒雅的的网络主播，在一次直播的过程中，他被一串神秘的弹幕所吸引，继而和弹幕的发送者章磊连麦。章磊则向童安及正在收听童安直播的网友们讲述了三个小孩子身边发生的故事，每一个故事中都会有一些若隐若现的关联，但到底章磊说这些是什么意思，童安并不知道，众多网友也跟着揣测和点评，可是听到第三个故事时童安发现他讲述的故事中的这个孩子和自己的女孩很相似，但又不能确定，因此疑惑更重了，在这种心理的驱使下童安一点点开始不安和紧张，他怀疑章磊绑架了三个孩子，可是章磊为什么这么做？孩子们究竟在哪儿？情况怎么样了？

　　崔志勋因犯事被分配到韩国有名的恶霸高中——大顺高中，这里的学生大多是有过犯罪前科的人，他们无恶不作，然而在这所混乱的高中，也有着独有的规矩，崔志勋想要重建大顺高中的秩序，就必须成为这所学校最强的校霸，这条称霸之路，并不容易...