67
2.0

忘失之舟

导演:
Nicol,Ruiz,Benavides
主演:
Rosa,Ramírez,Ríos,Romana,Satt,Gabriela,Arancibia
别名:
未知
2.0
67人评分
其它
语言
2020-09-17
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  克勞蒂娜在丈夫過世後,搬去與女兒、孫子同住,重新展開生活。她結識了鄰居已婚女子,甜蜜的情愫悄悄在兩人間醞釀。然而,面對小鎮保守的風氣,克勞蒂娜能否勇敢追尋自我,好好享受人生後半場?這是一段無論年齡多寡依然保有自由心靈的樂齡酷兒故事,人生七十才開始的最佳見證。

猜你喜欢
换一换
花楸故事
838
8.0
HD国语
花楸故事
8.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:杨太平,武斌,王小丹
简介:

  花楸村小学的老师王彩骑着他的小三轮从县上接回了他们村小学新来的支教老师谭文君。谭文君是省城的大学生,她的父母给她安排好了的工作被她拒绝了,她选择了到花楸支教。王彩带着谭文君介绍参观了他们的学校,并向孩子们介绍了他们的新老师,气氛非常融洽。 花楸村的甘老头是个做风筝的高手,更是个种茶的高手。村长带着闷葫芦为讨好甘老头做了只风筝送给他,但甘老头却不领情。 谭文君已经开始了她的教学生涯,村长代表村上接待了她,村长对这个与他年龄相仿,年轻漂亮的谭老师来到他们村上支教感到很是兴奋。谭老师与村长两个年轻人第一次见面之时的眼神碰撞也是多了一份尴尬。 王彩把自己的房间腾了出来给谭文君住,而他则回到了自己的老宅,老宅应很久没人住了,布满了蜘蛛网,也没有通电。谭文君住进了王彩老师的房间,从满墙的奖状才发现了王彩老师身上的故事。王彩一直默默无闻的在这个偏僻小村工作了一辈子,教育了一代又一代的人,这些都让文君很是感动。 谭文君与孩子们的相处非常融洽,她也开始融入了她的这个职业及新的生活。正在这个时候她的男朋友从省城过来看望她。带来了一些他的境况,一些生意上的得失。让文君感慨颇多。 文君父母也来看望她了,他们在城里找关系给文君安排了一个很好的工作,被文君拒绝。因为她已然舍不得这里的孩子们。而且面对村长、王彩他们的请求她也无法拒绝。 文君留下来了,给孩子带来了无比的欢乐。村长搞的种茶开发也有了一定的进展。而就在此时,王彩却也常年劳累留下的顽疾夺走了他的生命。 整个村都陷入了悲痛。谭文君更是。她以王彩为自己的精神向导,然而这一刻,她的精神却崩塌了。 村上举行的隆重的葬礼,悼念他们尊敬的王老师。谭文君的父母也来了。在沉重中,文君选择了留下接替王老师的信仰。她的父母也从内心里应允、认可了她。 葬礼过后,文君勤勤恳恳的带着整个村上的孩子们努力学习。村长跟闷葫芦也从甘老头那要到了种茶的秘方。 花楸村开始了他们新的生活。

5848
2010
花楸故事
主演:杨太平,武斌,王小丹
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
相助
867
4.0
HD中字
相助
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:艾玛·斯通,维奥拉·戴维斯,布莱丝·达拉斯·霍华德,奥克塔维亚·斯宾瑟,杰西卡·查斯坦,阿娜·欧蕾利,艾莉森·珍妮,安娜·坎普,克里斯·劳威尔,西西莉·泰森,迈克·沃格尔,茜茜·斯派塞克,布莱恩·科尔文,约翰·威斯利·查特曼,安洁纽·艾莉丝,肖恩·麦克雷,苔拉李格斯,莱斯利·乔丹,玛丽·斯汀伯根,蒂凡尼·布劳威尔,Carol,Sutton,艾什莉·约翰逊,里奇·蒙哥马利,尼尔森·埃利斯,大卫·奥伊罗,La,Chanze,丹娜·爱薇,贝基·弗莱,Medgar,Evers,朱莉·安·多恩,约翰·肯尼迪,罗伯特
简介:

  上世纪60年代,在密西西比州,黑佣艾比里恩(维奥拉•戴维斯 Viola Davis 饰)勤勤恳恳照顾女主人的女儿,后者因产后抑郁症只顾与闺蜜贪欢。密西西比大学毕业生斯基特(艾玛•斯通 Emma Stone 饰)在报社负责家庭主妇信箱,并由此开始黑佣的生存状态。其中,希利(布莱丝•达拉斯•霍华德 Bryce Dallas Howard 饰)无疑是反面教材,她态度傲慢,对黑佣米妮(奥克塔维亚•斯宾瑟 Octavia Spencer 饰)抱有偏见,并力主黑佣不能与主人共用厕所。最终因不堪受辱,米妮愤然离去,并以牙还牙,假借道歉之机让她蒙羞。斯基特开始采访艾比里恩和米妮,希望了解黑佣的生存状态,并为自己的新书积累素材。与此同时,马丁路德金领导的平权运动正在如火如荼地开展,而斯基特所在的密西西比州正是斗争的前沿,因为黑人遭射杀的血案,种族隔离开始,一场肤色之争在所难免……

372
2011
相助
主演:艾玛·斯通,维奥拉·戴维斯,布莱丝·达拉斯·霍华德,奥克塔维亚·斯宾瑟,杰西卡·查斯坦,阿娜·欧蕾利,艾莉森·珍妮,安娜·坎普,克里斯·劳威尔,西西莉·泰森,迈克·沃格尔,茜茜·斯派塞克,布莱恩·科尔文,约翰·威斯利·查特曼,安洁纽·艾莉丝,肖恩·麦克雷,苔拉李格斯,莱斯利·乔丹,玛丽·斯汀伯根,蒂凡尼·布劳威尔,Carol,Sutton,艾什莉·约翰逊,里奇·蒙哥马利,尼尔森·埃利斯,大卫·奥伊罗,La,Chanze,丹娜·爱薇,贝基·弗莱,Medgar,Evers,朱莉·安·多恩,约翰·肯尼迪,罗伯特
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫