176
9.0

殖边外史

导演:
王元龙
主演:
谢云卿,黎明晖,王元龙,王锦明,周文珠,包元铭,杨静我,王征信
别名:
未知
9.0
176人评分
国语
语言
未知
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

 景色怡人的六合乡,民风淳朴。乡人黎长福薄有良田。妻子王氏娴淑有德、吃苦耐劳。天真活泼的女儿阿贞深得二老的宠爱。王氏的侄子王桂生,父亲早亡,寄居在长福家,他与阿贞相亲相爱感情甚好。忠厚老实的老五和四官是长福家的长工。有了他们帮忙,长福一有空便黄酒三杯备觉快乐。老五与乡中卖酒人杨老包的女儿毛媛相爱。皓月当空的晚上,老五和毛媛情话正浓时,被四官和踏月归来的桂生、阿贞窃听,大家一起嬉闹而归。王氏日夜操荣积劳成疾,一天,她突然头晕,溘然长逝。家人悲痛万分。王氏死后,厨房中的事便交给阿贞和桂生料理。阿贞从小娇生惯养,终日与村童玩耍,哪里会烹饪,桂生更是外行。为此,长福觉得续妻之事不能拖延。周顺卿自外村迁来,其姑母从未嫁人,在杨老包的撮合下,长福与周氏成亲。周氏进入黎家后对阿贞非常严厉,她妒忌阿贞与桂生相爱,找借口责备阿贞。阿贞向父亲诉苦却遭其父斥责。可怜的阿贞跑到母亲的坟前默默地哭泣。顺卿见阿贞生得美,求计于周氏,周氏嫉恨桂生,答应把阿贞嫁给顺卿。这件事被邻屋的桂生听到告诉阿贞。阿贞用其母生前已答应他们的婚事安慰桂生。政府号召移民边外,劝募队来到六合乡鸣金宣传。周氏借机让桂生应征前往自创事业。桂生只得顺从。当晚桂生召集老五、阿贞等商量此事,决定桂生、老五去边外,四官与阿贞、毛媛作伴。离别之日,阿贞深情地告诉桂生,无论如何受苦也要等他成功归来。桂生离家后,周氏对阿贞更加苛刻,阿贞不幸患病。顺卿所定婚期迫近,阿贞把毛媛叫来递给她两封信,嘱她一封托人带到边外,一封等桂生归来再交给他。在后母的威逼下,阿贞做了周家的新妇。新婚之夜,醉醺醺的顺卿正欲对阿贞动手动脚,阿贞突然抽刀将其刺死,留下遗书投井而亡。广阔的边外,桂生和老王喜出望外地收到各自心上人的来信。老五为阿贞拒婚投井的消息惊骇不已,再看桂生见信欢呼跳跃。原来,阿贞信中说继母待她很好等等,老五阅后伤心之极。一日,桂生思乡心切,老五劝阻不听,二人相随一同返回故乡。桂生看到眼前荆棘满庭的景象恍惚觉得似在梦中,询问村童才知阿贞、长福已相继去世,周氏席卷所有而逃。桂生悲痛欲绝。毛媛将阿贞另一信函交给桂生,信中所言更令桂生为之心碎。万念俱灰的桂生遵阿贞遗言,老包遵女毛媛之意,关了酒店随老五、桂生一起回到边外。他们来到门前,见大门虚掩,一女子正在整理炊具。原来此女正是阿贞,阿贞扑进桂生怀中高兴得哭泣起来。四官归来向大家讲述了阿贞未死的经过,从此,几个伙伴都和心爱的人幸福地生活在一起。

猜你喜欢
换一换
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
搜索
719
5.0
HD
搜索
5.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:高圆圆,姚晨,赵又廷,陈红,王学圻,王珞丹,陈燃,张译,余皑磊,张大礼,马维福,杨青,霍青,谭松韵
简介:

  网络时代的“人肉”技术,通常是娱乐大众的利器,但很不幸,它也可能成为一种杀人工具。
  上市企业董事长秘书叶蓝秋(高圆圆 饰)在获知自己罹患癌症之后,心灰意冷的她上了一辆公交车,沉浸在惊愕与恐惧的她,拒绝给车上的老大爷让座,引起众议,这一过程被电视台实习记者杨佳琪(王珞丹 饰)用手机拍个正着。佳琪将公车上的新闻火速交给准嫂子陈若兮(姚晨 饰),凭着新闻主编的敏锐嗅觉,若兮将此新闻恶意放大,从而引发了一场社会大搜索,集体讨伐叶蓝秋的道德沦丧。在公众指责和病魔降临的夹缝中,叶蓝秋带着老板沈流舒(王学圻 饰)借给她的100万,彻底玩起了消失。岂料这更使她被冠以“小三”之名。若兮的摄影师男友无意中被卷入叶蓝秋的世界中,为了获得一笔高额报酬,他受雇陪伴在叶左右。而他却不曾想到,这竟是这个饱受指责的女人生命中最后一段时光。叶蓝秋的自杀,彻底颠覆了陈若兮的爱情与生活,也让所有人开始反思……

4410
2012
搜索
主演:高圆圆,姚晨,赵又廷,陈红,王学圻,王珞丹,陈燃,张译,余皑磊,张大礼,马维福,杨青,霍青,谭松韵
弗兰克叔叔
659
3.0
HD中字
弗兰克叔叔
3.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:保罗·贝坦尼,索菲娅·莉莉丝,彼得·马克迪斯,斯蒂夫·扎恩,朱迪·格雷尔,玛格·马丁戴尔,斯蒂芬·鲁特,罗伊丝·史密斯,简·麦克尼尔,凯蒂·布鲁尔,汉娜·布莱克,迈克尔·班克斯,伊莎贝拉·潘比安奇,布鲁格斯·詹金斯,扎克·斯特鲁姆,科尔顿·瑞安,布瑞特·伦茨勒,Alan,Campbell,科尔·杜曼,Dave,Hager,迈克尔·哈丁,大卫·布莱米,卡尔森·霍尔姆斯,理查德·道森,梅夫·格里芬
简介:

  讲述1973年,少女贝丝离开南方乡村老家,前往纽约大学读书,她亲爱的叔叔弗兰克是位受人尊敬的文学教授,贝丝很快发现弗兰克是同性恋,和长期伴侣沃利住在一起,而这个秘密他隐瞒了多年。在弗兰克父亲/贝丝的祖父突然去世后,弗兰克不得不回家参加葬礼,并最终面对一个埋藏已久、他的整个成年生活都在逃避的创伤。

2715
2020
弗兰克叔叔
主演:保罗·贝坦尼,索菲娅·莉莉丝,彼得·马克迪斯,斯蒂夫·扎恩,朱迪·格雷尔,玛格·马丁戴尔,斯蒂芬·鲁特,罗伊丝·史密斯,简·麦克尼尔,凯蒂·布鲁尔,汉娜·布莱克,迈克尔·班克斯,伊莎贝拉·潘比安奇,布鲁格斯·詹金斯,扎克·斯特鲁姆,科尔顿·瑞安,布瑞特·伦茨勒,Alan,Campbell,科尔·杜曼,Dave,Hager,迈克尔·哈丁,大卫·布莱米,卡尔森·霍尔姆斯,理查德·道森,梅夫·格里芬
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫