危情瘾难耐
1.0 |2025年08月02日 |HD中字
简介:

  在朋友们的眼里,佐伊(莎朗·莉尔 Sharon Leal 饰)俨然拥有完美无缺的幸福生活,她有一份稳定而收入优渥的工作,和丈夫杰森(波瑞斯·科乔 Boris Kodjoe 饰)结婚多年彼此之间感情一直十分亲密,两人共同养育了两个可爱乖巧的孩子,一切都是那样的妥帖。然而只有佐伊自己知道,在快乐的表象都无法填补她心里巨大的黑洞,燃烧的欲望无时不刻不在折磨和摧毁着她。
  某日,佐伊遇见了年轻英俊的画家昆汀(威廉·利维 William Levy 饰),欲火就这样被点燃烧得一发不可收拾。绝望的佐伊甚至想向医生寻求帮助,但这并没有什么用处。随着时间的推移,过着双面生活的佐伊,她的世界走到了濒临崩溃的边缘。

猜你喜欢
换一换
双刃剑复活的男人
898
3.0
HD中字
双刃剑复活的男人
3.0
更新时间:07月03日
主演:织田裕二,小野花梨,津田健次郎,明日海里奥,细田善彦,影山优佳,和久井映见,音尾琢真,光石研
简介:

 一名大人物政治家的女儿遭人杀害,遗体在河滩被发现。她的嘴被胶带缠住,身上穿着被鲜血染得通红的白色连衣裙——这种惨烈的作案手法,与三年前“本应已经死去”的连环杀人犯马饲野隆一极为相似。鉴识课的中津川毅等人对现场采集到的嫌疑人毛发进行鉴定后,结果显示与三年前采集到的马饲野的毛发一致。负责指挥搜查本部的管理官国领克俊据此断定是马饲野所为,并宣布要“召回”某个男人。所谓“某个男人”,正是三年前事件中唯一与马饲野接触过的刑警——郡司孝介(织田裕二 饰)。他曾被称为“搜查一课的王牌”,破案数量遥遥领先,惹出的问题也同样数不胜数。然而,他在与马饲野接触的现场遭到刺伤,之后被调往辖区的生活安全课,如今不得不过着轮椅生活。虽然这是为了国领的升迁,但搜查一课系长富县纱荣子坚决反对召回郡司。即便郡司来到搜查一课,她也对他态度冷淡,但郡司并不在意。为了让坐轮椅的郡司也能前往案发现场,国领打算给他安排一名协助人员。郡司则提出,希望由自己在街上偶然遇到的搜查二课财务搜查官阿久都华瑠(小野花梨 饰)担任自己的支援搭档。然而,国领拒绝了这一提议。事实上,华瑠患有自闭症谱系障碍,他判断她很难应对既定日程之外的事情。但郡司看出了华瑠的能力与洞察力,仍不愿放弃,并对她说道:“你不是因为想在自己能做的工作里,选择最能帮助别人的事情,才成为警察的吗?”“如果你总是把房间的门打开,是因为内心想与外界保持联系的话,那就和我一起查案吧。”郡司的这番话打动了华瑠,她终于决定与郡司一起展开调查!郡司和华瑠随即开始调查被害者结衣的房间,并在书架后面发现了藏起来的华丽服装和假发。如果结衣还有不为人知的另一面,那么她或许并不符合马饲野一贯只挑选清纯女性作为目标的偏好。就在这样的疑问浮现时,华瑠注意到,捆绑被害者的绳结是由右撇子打出来的。而马饲野是左撇子,这就产生了矛盾。进一步调查还发现,案发现场留下的塑料瓶上的指纹也被不自然地擦拭过。然而,以纱荣子为首的搜查一课刑警们却不愿正视这些矛盾……?就在这时,又出现了新的被害者!这一次的案件中,也能看到与马饲野作案倾向相矛盾的地方。众人围绕“究竟是马饲野所为”,还是“模仿犯作案”产生分歧,而郡司与华瑠则逐渐接近了一个令人震惊的真相……!?

2244
2026
双刃剑复活的男人
主演:织田裕二,小野花梨,津田健次郎,明日海里奥,细田善彦,影山优佳,和久井映见,音尾琢真,光石研
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
飞行家
903
4.0
HD国语|中字
飞行家
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥,凯特·布兰切特,凯特·贝金赛尔,约翰·C·赖利,亚历克·鲍德温,阿伦·阿尔达,伊安·霍姆,丹尼·赫斯顿,格温·斯蒂芬妮,裘德·洛,亚当·斯科特,马特·罗斯,凯丽·加纳,弗兰西丝·康罗伊,布伦特·斯皮内,爱德华·赫曼,威廉·达福,肯尼斯·威尔什,J.C.麦肯泽,雅各布·戴维奇,艾米·斯洛安,山姆·亨宁斯,乔·克里斯特,洛福斯·温莱特,哈里·斯坦德乔夫斯基,文斯·佐丹奴,约希·麦兰,Justin,Shilton,亚瑟·霍尔顿,约瑟夫·莱迪,伊夫·雅克,卢顿·万恩怀特三世,杰森·卡弗利尔,
简介:

  本片依据Howard Hughes的生平改编。
  Howard Hughes(Leonardo DiCaprio 饰)出生于美国德州休士顿,18岁时,他继承父亲德州油井的财富,心怀电影梦想移居好莱坞。1926年他买入125家戏院的控制权,砸下数百万美金拍了实景空战史诗电影《地狱天使》,成为著名的制片人;1939年,他入主环球航空公司,他迅速使公司扭亏为盈,二战期间与美国军方合作,主持了蓝云杉飞机的发明和改进。
  Howard Hughes在事业上取得巨大成功的同时,他也饱受了忧郁症和精神官能强迫症的折磨;他的感情生活波折重重,Katharine Hepburn(Cate Blanchett 饰)、Ava Gardner(Kate Beckinsale 饰)先后离开他,让他备受打击。
  影片选取Howard Hughes重要的生活事件,真实地再现了他的传奇。

716
2004
飞行家
主演:莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥,凯特·布兰切特,凯特·贝金赛尔,约翰·C·赖利,亚历克·鲍德温,阿伦·阿尔达,伊安·霍姆,丹尼·赫斯顿,格温·斯蒂芬妮,裘德·洛,亚当·斯科特,马特·罗斯,凯丽·加纳,弗兰西丝·康罗伊,布伦特·斯皮内,爱德华·赫曼,威廉·达福,肯尼斯·威尔什,J.C.麦肯泽,雅各布·戴维奇,艾米·斯洛安,山姆·亨宁斯,乔·克里斯特,洛福斯·温莱特,哈里·斯坦德乔夫斯基,文斯·佐丹奴,约希·麦兰,Justin,Shilton,亚瑟·霍尔顿,约瑟夫·莱迪,伊夫·雅克,卢顿·万恩怀特三世,杰森·卡弗利尔,
评论区
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫