巴比伦2022
2.0 |2025年08月02日 |HD中字
简介:

  影片聚焦1920年代创立初期的好莱坞,无声到有声电影转变时期,充满了追逐名利、财富和权力的人,刻画多个角色的起落,以及野心勃勃、狂野不羁和全面失控的人生。
  大多数角色都为虚构,但灵感来自现实生活中的好莱坞明星:布拉德·皮特饰演热爱派对的电影巨星杰克·康拉德,灵感来自现实中约翰·吉尔伯特、克拉克·盖博、道格拉斯·范朋克等人;玛格特·罗比饰演斗志旺盛、有抱负的女演员内莉·拉罗伊,是现实中克拉拉·鲍、珍妮·伊戈尔斯、琼·克劳馥、阿尔玛·鲁本斯等好莱坞早期明星的融合;迭戈·卡尔瓦饰演墨西哥移民曼尼·托雷斯,是好莱坞的局外人,在巴比伦世界充当观众的眼睛;李丽君饰演Fay Zhu,灵感来自黄柳霜;马奎尔饰演詹姆斯·麦凯,灵感来自卓别林;麦克思·明格拉饰演唯一一个真实人物:制片人艾尔文·萨尔伯格。

猜你喜欢
换一换
史泰登岛国王
656
3.0
HD中字
史泰登岛国王
3.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:皮特·戴维森,蓓尔·波利,里奇·韦莱兹,卢·威尔逊,莫伊塞斯·阿里亚斯,卡莉·阿奎利诺,玛丽莎·托梅,茉德·阿帕图,罗伯特·维达尔三世,安格斯·科斯特洛,宝琳·查拉梅,琳恩·科普利兹,约瑟夫·保罗·肯尼迪,妮娜·赫尔曼,杰克·汉布林,凯文·考利甘,卢克·大卫·布鲁姆,比尔·伯尔,德里克·盖恩斯,Rich,Vos,史蒂夫·布西密,吉米·塔特罗,亚历克西斯·蕾·佛伦哲,多米尼克·隆巴多兹,拉斐尔·普里埃,帕梅拉·阿德龙,娜娜·门萨,机关枪凯利,安东尼·李·梅迪纳,罗伯特·斯密戈尔,Marilyn,Torres
简介:

  剧情灵感来自戴维森的真实生活,包括他那在911事件中去世的消防员父亲。主角为二十多岁的男子Scott,他跟妈妈住一起,梦想是当纹身师,但每天除了吸麻和朋友鬼混、暗暗勾搭青梅竹马之外无所事事。而妈妈找的新男友却引发了一系列事件,迫使开始Scott正视自己的人生。

462
2020
史泰登岛国王
主演:皮特·戴维森,蓓尔·波利,里奇·韦莱兹,卢·威尔逊,莫伊塞斯·阿里亚斯,卡莉·阿奎利诺,玛丽莎·托梅,茉德·阿帕图,罗伯特·维达尔三世,安格斯·科斯特洛,宝琳·查拉梅,琳恩·科普利兹,约瑟夫·保罗·肯尼迪,妮娜·赫尔曼,杰克·汉布林,凯文·考利甘,卢克·大卫·布鲁姆,比尔·伯尔,德里克·盖恩斯,Rich,Vos,史蒂夫·布西密,吉米·塔特罗,亚历克西斯·蕾·佛伦哲,多米尼克·隆巴多兹,拉斐尔·普里埃,帕梅拉·阿德龙,娜娜·门萨,机关枪凯利,安东尼·李·梅迪纳,罗伯特·斯密戈尔,Marilyn,Torres
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
黑林鼓声
221
3.0
HD国语
黑林鼓声
3.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:郭建国,刘龙,张晓玲,杨秀章,曹橹
简介:

  1950年初,云南省哈尼族支系爱尼人聚居的爱尼山宣告解放。躲藏在原始森林中的窝古力匪帮,预感到末日即将来临,企图打出黑森林,与善良的爱尼人和__QUOTE__红汉人__QUOTE__拼个你死我活。联防队长扎格利奉解放军肖排长之命,离别爱妻兰娜和幼子小利戈,到山中客店去接一批枪支弹药,半路上遇到匪徒腊本都,两人展开了一场格斗,武功超群的扎格利生擒了腊本都。他从腊本都的口供中得知了敌人的信号,一个引匪山林,一网打尽的战斗方案产生了。猎手杜巴老爹的孙子果龙,协助扎格利转移枪支,在森林里遇到猛虎,慌忙躲避中又撞上狡猾的土匪多飘。果龙与多飘展开了一场格斗,最后双双倒在河滩上,扎格利暗中跟随土匪乔腊,摸清了窝古力匪帮的虚实。乔腊被窝古力打伤,扎格利背着受重伤的乔腊,闯到土匪庄铁的窝棚前,通知庄铁敲木鼓传窝古力的命令:明晨五更,林边集合。木鼓声回荡在整个大森林中,这鼓声是窝古力匪帮的丧钟,也是爱尼人胜利的角号。扎格利怀着兴奋、喜悦的心情,回到山寨。暮色中,他亲眼看到联防队副队长约墨打昏了前来与村中暗藏匪徒联系的土匪军师皮落。约墨大叔告诉扎格利一切都安排好了,扎格利便放心地踏着月色朝自己家走去。当他快步登上竹梯,正要跨入家门时,突然从暗中飞来一支毒剑,正中他的要害。扎格利强忍着剧痛向闻声而来的妻子兰娜口授了敌人的信号,说完便倒在平台上,为受尼人的幸福献出了年轻的生命。天色朦胧透亮,杜巴老爹与联防队员在龙巴门严阵以待。一名匪徒正欲放火焚烧龙巴门,忽被一支暗箭射中倒地。杜巴老爹抬头望去,见草丛中墨影一闪,杜巴老爹扬手投出标枪,黑影应声倒地。大家这才看清楚,窝古力藏在寨子里的耳目、杀害扎格利的凶手,正是联防队副队长约墨。一声枪响划破林中的寂静。窝古力匪帮听到信号,蠢蠢欲动。但他们还未跨出地盘,便被早已埋伏好的解放军消灭在山谷中。

1431
1985
黑林鼓声
主演:郭建国,刘龙,张晓玲,杨秀章,曹橹
再塑一个我
652
10.0
HD国语
再塑一个我
10.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:雷鸣,王滨雁,方青卓,宫让,谭元元
简介:

  剧作家苏雨写的剧本《奋斗者》上演后,受到社会舆论的批评。他决定到生活中去调查研究,以证是非。在某法院,院长介绍他认识了审判员解稼芬,并让他以人民陪审员身份参与调解一起正在审理的离婚案。要求离婚者是中年雕塑家莫磊。莫磊的妻子叫池波,她在病床上含泪向苏雨诉说了他们家庭的变化:她和莫磊是雕塑系的同学,彼此相爱,曾发誓要以屈原的《九歌》为题材,雕塑出永留人间的艺术群像。她爱莫磊,更爱他的艺术才华,她承担起全部家务劳动,支持丈夫专心致志地进行创作。哪知莫磊成名后另寻新欢,家庭悲剧给池波带来无限的痛苦,但苏雨看到,他面前这位瘦弱的女性虽承受着不幸,却带着孩子坚强地挣扎着、奋斗着,并一心雕塑少年保护神--少司命,以实现年轻时和莫磊一起许下的诺言。苏雨还了解到第三者叫宁莉莉,是莫磊的学生和热情助手。她明知莫磊有妻子孩子,但并不认为自己的行为有什么错误,因为她对爱情有自己的观点,认为爱情不应该受什么条约和义务的约束。然而人们看到宁莉莉在她纺织的情网中很少有欢乐的时候。她忧虑地期待着莫磊,而莫磊又有难言之隐,始终没有答应她的要求,这使狂热的宁莉莉感到失望和伤心。法院的态度,道义的谴责,孩子的呼声,使他们双方陷入了痛苦的深渊。最后在解稼芬和苏雨的帮助下,尤其当池波从雕塑架上摔下,女儿因找爸爸落入湖中时,他们的感情受到强烈震动。莫磊悔悟了,带着愧疚的心情到医院看望了病中的妻子,宁莉莉终于发现此路不通,背上画夹,离开城市,走向新的生活。在审理这一案件中,苏雨本人实际上也是个被审者,因为在爱情和家庭问题上,他和莫磊在走着同一条路,所不同的只是远近而已都有了新的认识。他决心重新写一个剧本,并在家庭生活中弥补自己的过失。他意识到了一个作家的社会责任,一个丈夫对妻子、对女儿的家庭责任。他毅然否定了《奋斗者》,并陪同妻子到剧院观看了自己的新作《再塑一个我》。

550
1984
再塑一个我
主演:雷鸣,王滨雁,方青卓,宫让,谭元元
评论区
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫