曼谷危情:天堂地狱
8.0 |2025年08月02日 |HD中字
简介:

  一位急救人員在曼谷的危險地段被捲入兩派衝突,必須努力設法保命。

猜你喜欢
换一换
科莱特
895
4.0
HD中字
科莱特
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:伊里·马德尔,克蕾蒙丝·西尔莱,Juraj,Adamík,Radek,Balcárek,吉里·巴托斯卡,埃里克·鲍尔,Dan,Brown,Lubomir,Burgr,Václav,Chalupa,扬·茨纳,Michal,Dlouhý,Jeremi,Durand,Helena,Dvoráková,伊凡·弗拉内克,帕维尔·盖多斯,安德烈·赫里科,芭芭拉·科德托娃,翁德里·科瓦奇,苏珊娜·莫拉利,萨宾娜·罗伊科娃,Pavel,Rímský,Tomas,Sotak,Kristína,Svarinská,米罗斯拉夫
简介:

  本片根据卢斯蒂格的小说《一个来自安特卫普的女孩》改编。
  1973年,居住在纽约的捷克犹太作家威利·弗雷德知道儿子女朋友的母亲也曾被关押在奥斯维辛集中营,父子俩登门拜会,威利见到了苦寻三十年的集中营恋人科莱特·科恩,威利的记忆闸门再次被打开……
  1943年7月威利被转押到奥斯维辛·比克瑙集中营,不久比利时犹太女孩科莱特也被火车送来。威利在火车站台上叮嘱刚下车的科莱特要自称缝纫工,这使得科莱特免遭进毒气室。后来科莱特被分配去检查犹太人衣物中藏匿的贵重物品;威利则利用送取衣物之机偷偷在营内传递食品和药物,共同的命运使两人很快相恋了…
  比克瑙集中营司令官韦杰斯克凶残无比,动辄开枪杀人,任何违规行为都要当场处死,他也盯上了科莱特,软硬兼施占有了她…
  1944年9月,随着苏军的逼近,纳粹加紧执行对犹太人的“最终解决方案” ,剩下的犹太人将被转到豪森集中营。这时,科莱特怀孕了。威利好容易找到藏在往外运木材车上逃跑的机会,就在一切安排妥当之时,科莱特却因被韦杰斯克缠住未能及时赶到,为了心爱的人,威利放弃了这次机会。
  科莱特最终还是被押上了开往豪森集中营的火车,被解救后科莱特生下了韦杰斯克的女儿汉娜。
  1945年1月,威利在被转押途中遇到苏军,韦杰斯克因仍枪杀逃跑的囚犯而被愤怒的囚犯打死。战后威利四处寻找科莱特无果…
  剧中还描写了一批曾帮助过他俩的人:波兰医生大卫因知道科莱特怀孕而遭灭口;彪悍管理员弗里茨多次帮助威利;虽爱财但暗中帮助科莱特旳波兰女管理员布罗德因为帮科莱特搞到通行证被发现而被处死……

1196
2013
科莱特
主演:伊里·马德尔,克蕾蒙丝·西尔莱,Juraj,Adamík,Radek,Balcárek,吉里·巴托斯卡,埃里克·鲍尔,Dan,Brown,Lubomir,Burgr,Václav,Chalupa,扬·茨纳,Michal,Dlouhý,Jeremi,Durand,Helena,Dvoráková,伊凡·弗拉内克,帕维尔·盖多斯,安德烈·赫里科,芭芭拉·科德托娃,翁德里·科瓦奇,苏珊娜·莫拉利,萨宾娜·罗伊科娃,Pavel,Rímský,Tomas,Sotak,Kristína,Svarinská,米罗斯拉夫
决战天门
952
2.0
HD国语
决战天门
2.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:胡慧中,曾江,王艾舜,张小燕,龙方,何柏光,郑月明,白英杰,马骥
简介:

  抗日战争时期,年轻的女考古学家方志珍与父亲方教授同在大学任教,志珍怀着强烈的爱国心决心把失落民间的神医华佗的医著寻找回来。志珍和日本考古学家川多磨在一座古塔中发现两颗明珠,却被也来寻书的德国人干戈一伙抢走,不久,川多磨奉命回国前夕,突然被指令留下寻找华佗医书,并有浪人西协美知子和高城丈二相助。干戈利诱大学教授携手寻书,志珍被他的无耻行径激怒,为尽快找到医书,她们来到漆黑的秘宫,在一颗明珠上找到了线索。她们立即赶到陈教授家,在一幅于禁跪送华佗的画里找到了“开启天门之匙”的字样。干戈随后而至,字迹已被志珍抹去。火车站上,志珍与川多磨相遇。川多磨直言相告,志珍更坚定了保住国宝的决心。她蓦然想起老同学蓝天曾说过家有宝物,是两把“开启天门之匙”。她与川多磨找到蓝天,蓝天慨然相赠,不料干戈的爪牙白痴突然将钥匙抢走,争斗中,白痴摔倒在炉旁石头上,烫热的钥匙在他前额烙下印记。干戈追来再次从志珍手中掠走钥匙。志珍猛然想起白痴额头印记,设计将白痴骗来,用石膏取下钥匙模型。众人拿着配制的钥匙来到黄山山麓,志珍与方教授合力开启了石门。在山洞尽头,众人发现了华佗当年藏书的箱子,可是铁箱是山洞中枢,动一动就会山崩地裂。志珍按照于禁图的指点,奋力抽出铁箱,抛给川多磨,要她迅速离洞。山洞崩裂,众人拼命奔出,而干戈率人已在山下摆阵守候。西协美知子被抓,川多磨搭救未成,西协被凶狠的干戈杀死。护宝激战中,方教授不幸牺牲,志珍等人怒不可遏。一场更为激烈的较量即将展开……

782
1993
决战天门
主演:胡慧中,曾江,王艾舜,张小燕,龙方,何柏光,郑月明,白英杰,马骥
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
午夜牛郎
963
10.0
HD中字
午夜牛郎
10.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:强·沃特,达斯汀·霍夫曼,西尔维娅·迈尔斯,约翰·麦盖沃,布伦达·瓦卡罗,巴纳德·休斯,鲁斯·怀特,詹妮弗·绍特,吉尔曼·兰金,琳达·戴维斯
简介:

  生活清贫的牛仔乔恩(乔恩·沃伊特 Jon Voight 饰)从老家来到纽约讨生活,他自认为风流倜傥,因此想在纽约当个男妓混口饭吃。当他第一天来到纽约时,就在大街上勾搭女人。不料,人地生疏的他生意不成反而亏了20块钱。沮丧不已的乔恩遇到了专靠骗点小钱为生的里佐(达斯汀·霍夫曼 Dustin Hoffman 饰),里佐骗乔恩说他认识一个男妓集团的首脑,但要收20元作为中介费。最后里佐只是把乔恩介绍给了一个同性恋的皮条客,愤怒不已的乔恩随后找到了里佐。里佐收留了无家可归的乔恩,两人渐渐成了无所不谈的好朋友。 寒冷的纽约冬天,两人过的十分辛酸,以至于衣食无着,里佐也没有钱买药治病
  里佐向往着迈阿密的生活,他邀请乔恩和他一起到迈阿密去闯世界。生活无着的两人这晚来到一家地下酒吧去碰运气,当乔恩终于搞到一单生意后,体力不支的里佐摔下了楼梯。奄奄一息的里佐此时最记挂的仍是迈阿密家乡的阳光,乔为了完成朋友的愿望,开始铤而走险。

3640
1969
午夜牛郎
主演:强·沃特,达斯汀·霍夫曼,西尔维娅·迈尔斯,约翰·麦盖沃,布伦达·瓦卡罗,巴纳德·休斯,鲁斯·怀特,詹妮弗·绍特,吉尔曼·兰金,琳达·戴维斯
飞行家
903
4.0
HD国语|中字
飞行家
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥,凯特·布兰切特,凯特·贝金赛尔,约翰·C·赖利,亚历克·鲍德温,阿伦·阿尔达,伊安·霍姆,丹尼·赫斯顿,格温·斯蒂芬妮,裘德·洛,亚当·斯科特,马特·罗斯,凯丽·加纳,弗兰西丝·康罗伊,布伦特·斯皮内,爱德华·赫曼,威廉·达福,肯尼斯·威尔什,J.C.麦肯泽,雅各布·戴维奇,艾米·斯洛安,山姆·亨宁斯,乔·克里斯特,洛福斯·温莱特,哈里·斯坦德乔夫斯基,文斯·佐丹奴,约希·麦兰,Justin,Shilton,亚瑟·霍尔顿,约瑟夫·莱迪,伊夫·雅克,卢顿·万恩怀特三世,杰森·卡弗利尔,
简介:

  本片依据Howard Hughes的生平改编。
  Howard Hughes(Leonardo DiCaprio 饰)出生于美国德州休士顿,18岁时,他继承父亲德州油井的财富,心怀电影梦想移居好莱坞。1926年他买入125家戏院的控制权,砸下数百万美金拍了实景空战史诗电影《地狱天使》,成为著名的制片人;1939年,他入主环球航空公司,他迅速使公司扭亏为盈,二战期间与美国军方合作,主持了蓝云杉飞机的发明和改进。
  Howard Hughes在事业上取得巨大成功的同时,他也饱受了忧郁症和精神官能强迫症的折磨;他的感情生活波折重重,Katharine Hepburn(Cate Blanchett 饰)、Ava Gardner(Kate Beckinsale 饰)先后离开他,让他备受打击。
  影片选取Howard Hughes重要的生活事件,真实地再现了他的传奇。

716
2004
飞行家
主演:莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥,凯特·布兰切特,凯特·贝金赛尔,约翰·C·赖利,亚历克·鲍德温,阿伦·阿尔达,伊安·霍姆,丹尼·赫斯顿,格温·斯蒂芬妮,裘德·洛,亚当·斯科特,马特·罗斯,凯丽·加纳,弗兰西丝·康罗伊,布伦特·斯皮内,爱德华·赫曼,威廉·达福,肯尼斯·威尔什,J.C.麦肯泽,雅各布·戴维奇,艾米·斯洛安,山姆·亨宁斯,乔·克里斯特,洛福斯·温莱特,哈里·斯坦德乔夫斯基,文斯·佐丹奴,约希·麦兰,Justin,Shilton,亚瑟·霍尔顿,约瑟夫·莱迪,伊夫·雅克,卢顿·万恩怀特三世,杰森·卡弗利尔,
评论区
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫