大变局之梦回甲午
10.0 |08月02日 |HD国语
简介:

  美术学院的研究生江海心陪同奶奶爱新觉罗·德毓到北京西郊的潭柘寺写生,在高大的帝王树下,奶奶为江海心讲述了她的爷爷爱新觉罗·溥远与奶奶云娜之间的传奇爱情故事。
  在公元1890年的冬天,年轻貌美的蒙古格格云娜在去潭柘寺的路上,被一群无所事事的贝勒们调戏,刚刚随同采买枪炮舰船的大臣从欧洲游历回国的溥远路见不平,愤而拔枪。在高大的帝王树下,溥远与云娜在一见钟情之后不顾随从侍女阻拦私定终身,一把短枪与一枚龙佩,成为他们情定一生的定情物。他们骇世惊俗的举动在京城掀起了轩然大波。老王爷要把溥远绑送到宗人府发落,云娜苦苦恳求,最后,寄予溥远厚望的老祖母发现了那枚龙佩,发现云娜竟然是自己亲如姊妹的表姐的后人,于是,在后海边百花深处胡同的王爷府,亲自为溥远和云娜主持了隆重的婚典。
  公元1894年年初,紫禁城内外纷纷忙碌于慈禧太后六十大寿,全然不顾日渐逼近的日本军国主义威胁。四处呼吁的溥远被流放到刘公岛的海军公衙。甲午之年,风云突变,日本联合舰队突袭大清舰队,大清帝国面对危局步步书写一个个败笔。日军登陆大连海滩,守军四处逃窜,日军攻破“远东第一要塞”旅顺,野蛮地举起屠刀,屠杀数万无辜百姓,尸横街道,冤魂游离。在这个危机关头,慈禧太后还在紫禁城庆祝大寿,紫禁城的戏台上水袖飞舞,千里外国土沦丧。溥远目睹与自己并肩作战的北洋海军官兵们或死或伤,悲愤交加。刘公岛失陷后,日军把北洋海军舰船拆除了大清龙旗,换上了日军旗帜。丁汝昌自杀,“镇远”舰护理管带杨用霖在悲愤绝望之中对准自己头部开出了北洋海军的最后一枪,饮弹自尽,刘公岛沉浸在巨大的悲恸之中。
  甲午一役,北洋海军烟消云散。甲午战争结束后,年迈的李鸿章在无奈之中飘洋过海,与伊藤博文展开了艰辛无比的谈判。回到京城的溥远,面对朝廷上下对北洋海军的指责,在愤怒之中扔了大清授予的“巴图鲁”绶带,呵斥军机处的大臣和户部官吏们,只顾窝里斗,是内斗内行,外斗外行,才真正是导致甲午惨败的罪魁祸首。在遭受排挤之后,溥远在郁闷之中以酒消愁,云娜劝他出去躲躲风头。
  再次回到威海卫的溥远,为遭受孩子们耻笑和围攻的男孩小海解围,在得知小海的父亲就是军舰上壮烈牺牲的的轮机手后,再也难以掩饰自己的愤怒和悲恸。溥远为小海讲述了自己的故事,把自己随身佩戴的龙佩送给小海,并告诉他:他的父亲是个真正的英雄,长大后一定要成为一个顶天立地的男子汉,守住门前的这片深蓝色的大海。
  溥远下落不明,再也没有回到京城。年轻的云娜终生没有再嫁,孤儿寡母,在乱世中艰难度日。
  在听了奶奶讲述的故事后,江海心决心沿着当年甲午战争的路走一遍,寻访溥远的足迹,画出120年前溥远的家国之梦和120后的甲午殇思。在写生的路上,江海心遇到了年轻英俊的海军特战队长,意外发现了那枚传说中的龙佩,找到小海的后人,揭开了溥远失踪的秘密,也在写生的路上收获了一份纯美的爱情……

猜你喜欢
换一换
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
巴斯克维尔的猎犬夏洛克剧场版
717
2.0
HD中字
巴斯克维尔的猎犬夏洛克剧场版
2.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:藤冈靛,岩田刚典,新木优子,广末凉子,村上虹郎,涩川清彦,西村雅彦,山田真步,佐佐木藏之介,小泉孝太郎,稻森泉,椎名桔平
简介:

  电影描绘了电视剧版发生的故事之后,两人再次相遇,再一次作为搭档开始接受工作委托后的最初的案件。福尔摩斯研究家和福尔摩斯粉丝称为“夏洛克·福尔摩斯”系列史上最高杰作的长篇杰作《巴斯卡维尔的猎犬》的故事作为原案。
  日本屈指可数的资本家委托若宫为他搜寻女儿绑架未遂事件的犯人。但在那之后,资本家留下庞大的遗产,离奇地死去。为了探听资本家的死和绑架事件的真相,狮子雄和若宫降落在濑户内海的某个岛上。等待他们的是,一个一个都很难对付的华丽一族和奇怪的关系者们……和周围阻断的这个岛上,人们窃窃私语着传说中会袭击人的可怕魔犬的所作所为。连锁反应一样接二连三地发生了案件。复杂的人际关系和交错的现在与过去。这是不能打开的“潘多拉之盒”吗?同时若宫也面临着穷途末路的危机……这时候,狮子雄的决断是?这之后,两人终于抵达的可怕真相又是?

1782
2022
巴斯克维尔的猎犬夏洛克剧场版
主演:藤冈靛,岩田刚典,新木优子,广末凉子,村上虹郎,涩川清彦,西村雅彦,山田真步,佐佐木藏之介,小泉孝太郎,稻森泉,椎名桔平
评论区
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫