别惹我
995
4.0
HD中字
别惹我
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:罗伯特·德尼罗,米歇尔·菲佛,迪安娜·阿格隆,约翰·德利奥,汤米·李·琼斯,吉米·帕伦博,多米尼克·隆巴多兹,斯坦·卡普,维森特·帕斯托雷,乔恩·弗雷达,小迈克尔·J·帕尼凯利,保罗·鲍格才,安东尼·德西奥,特德·阿尔奇迪,大卫·贝利
简介:

  法国一个宁静的小镇,某个夜晚搬来了布莱克一家:男主人弗莱德(罗伯特·德尼罗 Robert De Niro 饰)、妻子麦姬(米歇尔·菲佛 Michelle Pfeiffer 饰)以及他们的儿女瓦伦(约翰·德利奥  John D__APOS__Leo 饰)和贝尔(迪安娜·阿格隆 Dianna Agron 饰)。他们看似与其他的美国人没什么两样,然而一系列出格的举止却不得不让人对他们刮目相看。原来弗莱德的真实身份是历史悠久的黑手党家族曼佐尼的一员,为躲避追杀他在FBI探员罗伯特·斯坦菲尔德(汤米·李·琼斯 Tommy Lee Jones 饰)的安排下多次搬家。
  看似惬意舒适的隐居生活危机四伏,背负着背叛家族罪名的弗莱德终将迎来夺命杀手的拜访……

1264
2013
别惹我
主演:罗伯特·德尼罗,米歇尔·菲佛,迪安娜·阿格隆,约翰·德利奥,汤米·李·琼斯,吉米·帕伦博,多米尼克·隆巴多兹,斯坦·卡普,维森特·帕斯托雷,乔恩·弗雷达,小迈克尔·J·帕尼凯利,保罗·鲍格才,安东尼·德西奥,特德·阿尔奇迪,大卫·贝利
圣皮埃尔的寡妇
776
4.0
HD中字
圣皮埃尔的寡妇
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:朱丽叶·比诺什,丹尼尔·奥特伊,埃米尔·库斯图里卡,米歇尔·迪绍苏瓦,费利佩·曼吉安,克里斯蒂安·查尔梅坦特,菲利普·杜·詹纳兰德,莫里斯·舍维,Catherine,Lascault,Ghyslain,Tremblay,Reynald,Bouchard,马克·贝兰德,伊夫·雅克,Dominique,Quesnel,Anne-Marie,Philipe,伊莎贝尔·斯帕德,Arianne,Mallet,Julián,Gutiérrez,西尔维·莫罗
简介:

  1850年,一个遥远的法属小岛发生了一桩命案,醉了酒的渔夫(埃米尔·库斯图里卡 Emir Kusturica饰)犯下杀人罪,被判以极刑。然而这里山高皇帝远,没有铡刀之类的行刑工具,于是岛上的官员们求助于法国本部,让他们千里迢迢运来断头台。
  在这个等待的时间里,博爱善良的上尉夫人(朱丽叶·比诺什 Juliette Binoche饰)相信渔夫是一个本质不坏的人。她自从跟随丈夫来到这个荒凉的小岛之后,就一直料理着花园。如今她让渔夫帮她修整花园,干各种琐碎的家务活。渔夫和上尉夫人一同行善,还得到了居民的欢迎。上尉(丹尼尔·奥德耶 Daniel Auteuil饰)知道两人相处得日渐融洽,甚至萌生爱意,但出于对妻子无私的爱,他只是默默选择让妻子得到快乐。
  日子渐渐过去,断头台终于送到。上尉、上尉夫人和渔夫,也迎来了各人命运的转折。

2056
2000
圣皮埃尔的寡妇
主演:朱丽叶·比诺什,丹尼尔·奥特伊,埃米尔·库斯图里卡,米歇尔·迪绍苏瓦,费利佩·曼吉安,克里斯蒂安·查尔梅坦特,菲利普·杜·詹纳兰德,莫里斯·舍维,Catherine,Lascault,Ghyslain,Tremblay,Reynald,Bouchard,马克·贝兰德,伊夫·雅克,Dominique,Quesnel,Anne-Marie,Philipe,伊莎贝尔·斯帕德,Arianne,Mallet,Julián,Gutiérrez,西尔维·莫罗
史塔维斯基
582
4.0
HD中字
史塔维斯基
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:让-保罗·贝尔蒙多,弗朗索瓦·佩里埃,安妮·杜普蕾,迈克尔·朗斯代尔,Roberto,Bisacco,克洛德·里什,查尔斯·博耶,皮埃尔·韦尼耶,马塞尔·屈弗利耶,范都德,雅克·斯皮埃塞,米彻·博恩,Maurice,Jacquemont,西尔维娅·伯德斯库,雅克·埃塞
简介:

  一部有关阴谋政变的豪华传记片,取材自1930年代法国的一个真实的故事。风流潇洒的主人公是一位法国籍俄国犹太人,他曾以诈骗罪被捕入狱,出来后改名换姓四处行骗,从事非法的投机活动,最终控制了全巴黎的新闻出版界、跑马场、政界以及豪华的社交场所。他还是个不折不扣的赌徒。最终丑闻败露,与之一起倒台的还有许多受牵连的政府官员。他在追捕中不得不自杀。而这一事件同时也暴露了法国政界的内幕和丑闻,加剧了内部派系的斗争,使得法国政府经历了一次严重的政治危机,差点就垮台了。
  影片通过这样一个在上流社会靠行骗耍手段而飞黄腾达的骗子故事,来检视在那段经济不景气、人心彷徨的年代中人性的趋向和人的精神状况。中间还插入了苏联流亡人士托洛茨基来法国寻求庇护的内容,跟史塔维斯基组成鲜明的对比。编导目的在于暗喻法国政治取向的两种极端方向。桑德海姆的音乐恰到好处地配合了画面。

3280
1974
史塔维斯基
主演:让-保罗·贝尔蒙多,弗朗索瓦·佩里埃,安妮·杜普蕾,迈克尔·朗斯代尔,Roberto,Bisacco,克洛德·里什,查尔斯·博耶,皮埃尔·韦尼耶,马塞尔·屈弗利耶,范都德,雅克·斯皮埃塞,米彻·博恩,Maurice,Jacquemont,西尔维娅·伯德斯库,雅克·埃塞
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
美国制造1966
877
4.0
HD中字
美国制造1966
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:安娜·卡里娜,拉斯洛·绍博,让-皮埃尔·利奥德,玛丽安娜·菲斯福尔,伊夫·阿封索
简介:

  记者保拉为了追求杀害男友里沙尔的真正凶手,来到了亚特兰提克城,这是一个深受美国文化影响的地方,之后出现了一大堆像唐纳德、里查德、维德马克、多丽斯.沟口……有着怪名字的怪人。保拉在追寻真相的过程中,还卷入了政治阴谋和黑帮事件中。
  法国新浪潮电影大师戈达尔把美国好莱坞黑帮电影的所有元素用在这部非常刻意的政治恐怖片中,明显向该类型的大师萨缪尔?富勒、尼古拉斯?雷、霍华德?霍克斯等做了模仿式的致敬,片中还涉及许多真实的政治背景和暗杀事件。整部影片虽然显得情节荒唐,较为做作,但导演通过流行音乐(其中一首是《北非碟影》中的“时光流逝”)、广告插画、气氛处理等方法展现深受美国流行文化影响和主导下的法国社会景象。以《美国制造》为标志,戈达尔的政治批判意识进入其后期阶段。他将电影的叙事惯例当作现实政治在电影艺术门类中的主要表现而加以痛烈的反对。为此,他对电影的表现手段进行了极富挑战性的探索。

44
1966
美国制造1966
主演:安娜·卡里娜,拉斯洛·绍博,让-皮埃尔·利奥德,玛丽安娜·菲斯福尔,伊夫·阿封索
再一次初恋
189
4.0
HD中字
再一次初恋
4.0
更新时间:2025年08月02日
主演:马修·阿马立克,让-皮埃尔·利奥德,友兰达·梦露,诺埃米·洛夫斯基,德尼·波达利德斯,萨米尔·盖丝米,文森特·拉科斯特,安娜·阿尔瓦罗,米歇尔·维耶尔莫
简介:

  卡米拉(诺薇米·洛夫斯基 Noémie Lvovsky 饰)和埃里克(萨米尔·盖丝米 Samir Guesmi 饰)相识在十六岁的碧玉年华,相知、相爱,一路走来顺风顺水,两人是朋友和亲人眼中的佳偶天成。结婚后,卡米拉生下了一个可爱乖巧的小女儿,一转眼,曾经的少年少女已为人父母。
  时光荏苒,二十五年的漫长人生挥洒在弹指之间,随着时间的流逝,爱情之光日渐暗淡,终于,埃里克遇见了另一个令他心动的女人,他选择背弃了多年来风雨同舟的卡米拉。12月31日夜晚,当所有人都沉浸在迎接新年的快乐气氛中,只有卡米拉一人为自己落魄的生活而黯然神伤,而在一瞬间,卡米拉发现自己竟然重新回到了16岁那年,一切都倒退成为了青翠欲滴的模样,包括她和埃里克之间的爱情。重新站在时光的起点,这一次,卡米拉会做出怎样的选择呢?

1880
2012
再一次初恋
主演:马修·阿马立克,让-皮埃尔·利奥德,友兰达·梦露,诺埃米·洛夫斯基,德尼·波达利德斯,萨米尔·盖丝米,文森特·拉科斯特,安娜·阿尔瓦罗,米歇尔·维耶尔莫
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫