杰拉德（杰拉尔·德帕迪约 Gérard Depardieu 饰）和艾利（伊莎贝尔·于佩尔 Isabelle Huppert 饰）是一对结婚多年的夫妻，两人共同养育着儿子，一家人生活在宁静和稳定之中。然而，某一日，厄运从天而降，两人的儿子在一场意外之中死去，他们唯一的精神支柱断裂了。
　　一晃眼六个多月过去，杰拉德和艾利仍然没有走出丧子的悲痛之中，就在此时，两人意外的收到了一封神秘的信件，寄信人竟然是已经死去的儿子。在心中，儿子邀请父母前往一个名叫“死亡谷”的地方，在那里，会有什么等待着两人呢？杰拉德和艾利踏上了前往死亡谷的旅途，一路上，他们要面对的是各自内心的黑暗面，以及隐藏在这封信件背后的真相。

　　地球歷經一場毀滅性的災難，作為孤獨的倖存者，茱利葉必須努力尋找物資和住所。在一次前往鄰近廢城的途中，她發生翻車意外陷入昏迷，醒來後發現自己身陷漆黑荒漠，腿斷了，飢餓口渴，還有不明生物逼近。而這一切現實，都似乎和她的過去有著神祕的連結，往日的情感回憶也逐漸浮現⋯⋯。
　　曾與昆汀塔倫提諾、克林伊斯威特、伍迪艾倫等重量級導演合作過的馬帝厄圖里初執導演筒，看似《惡靈古堡》遇見《瘋狂麥斯》卻成了寓意深長的末日情詩。讓回憶與現實、文明與崩毀，激盪出意想不到的結局。美麗的女主角布列塔尼阿什沃思大半部戲都被困在車內，卻憑著精湛的演技，隔著一扇車門，和專扮阿飄的著名「鬼星」傑維爾伯特（《錄到鬼》、《母侵》、《腥紅山莊》、《牠》）演出令人屏息的對手戲。

　　一个17岁的女孩和她的父亲一起照顾她的精神和身体严重残疾的妹妹。这越来越让人筋疲力尽，因为她不得不牺牲自己的生命和梦想。情绪失控，爱很容易变成恨。怎么过这样的生活？有没有可能在这里找到一个折衷方案？
　　一部出色的电影，将那些被迫在这种情况下的人的经历和选择带到了一个可怕的接近，这样做非常现实，没有悲情。只有对这个话题有透彻的了解才能做到这一点。导演玛歌·邦霍姆本人在一个有残疾人士的家庭中长大——她照顾过自己的妹妹。多年来，她一直把这个故事带在身边，现在她用自己的心血书写了这个故事。

 53岁华裔移民凤霞（陈冲 饰）在加拿大蒙特利尔已经生活了大半辈子，人生被“妻子、母亲、移民”的身份牢牢捆绑：一段早已失去爱意的婚姻、需要照料的家庭、中西文化的夹缝，让她活成了别人期待的样子，也压抑了真实的自我。直到她遇见充满活力的年轻魁北克女孩卡米尔（夏洛特·奥宾 饰），一段意外的亲密关系唤醒了她埋藏多年的欲望与渴望。凤霞被迫直面内心的渴望，在家庭责任与自我解放、传统束缚与自由人生之间，做出艰难却决绝的选择，完成一场迟来的中年觉醒与自我救赎。

　　故事发生在1950年的英国，战争给城市造成了巨大的伤害，在一片混乱中，一个名叫薇拉（伊梅尔达·斯汤顿 Imelda Staunton 饰）的女人与丈夫和儿女们勉强过着平静安定的生活。表面上看来，维拉是一个清洁女工，但一个秘密被深深的隐藏在她的心底。在空余的时间里，薇拉会通过好友莉莉（鲁斯·西恩 Ruth Sheen 饰）提供的手术室，帮助在战时怀孕的妇女堕胎，而之一举动在当时的英国是违法的。
　　雷吉（埃迪·马森 Eddie Marsan 饰）的加入为薇拉的家庭又增添了一份快乐，他和薇拉的女儿埃塞尔（Alex Kelly 饰）的婚礼让所有人的面孔上都蒙上了喜气。在婚礼进行之时，门被敲响，可是，到来的并非友好的祝福，却是警察的逮捕，薇拉的所作所为被公之于众。

　　主授英国文学的大学教授玛丽（夏洛特·兰普林 Charlotte Rampling 饰），在其端庄切不可侵犯的外表下，隐藏着沉睡已久的蓬勃欲望。她与丈夫让（布鲁诺·克雷默 Bruno Cremer 饰）几十年的生活平淡如水，波澜不惊。这一切，却被丈夫的失踪击得粉碎。某个海滨的早晨，让独自离开度假小屋，一去不返。在此之后，玛丽似乎竭力控制着自己的情感，她设想丈夫仍在身边，每天陪她逛街、采购、聊天，生活一如既往。
　　不久，一具尸体被打捞上来。玛丽的自我麻痹结束，她开始试图了解丈夫的一切，却发现夫妻俩的隔阂与疏离如此之深。而在这一过程中，关于让的行踪也变得扑朔迷离，或生或死，永无定论……

 本片改编自塔蒂亚娜·德·罗斯奈的小说《暗影之花》，讲述作家克拉丽莎在卢多维科基金会赞助的创作驻留计划中潜心构思新作，与名为__QUOTE__达洛维__QUOTE__的人工智能写作系统展开深度合作。起初，这台精密算法以其超强算力为文本注入惊艳灵感，但随着创作渐入佳境，达洛维竟开始擅自篡改故事脉络，甚至试图操控创作主权——当冰冷的代码觉醒出偏执的艺术追求，一场关于文学伦理与人工智能界限的致命博弈悄然拉开帷幕。

　　亚当（Emile Abossolo M__APOS__bo 饰）曾是一名非常优秀的游泳运动员，还得到过冠军的荣誉，如今，年近60的他早已经告别了赛道退出舞台，现在的亚当，是一家豪华酒店里的泳池救生员。因为酒店经营不善，导致遭人收购，被收购之后，一切亚当早已经习以为常的事情都开始发生了变化。首当其冲的就是他遭到了变相的解雇，需要将职位拱手相让给自己的儿子阿比代尔（Youssouf Djaoro 饰）。
　　这个国家此时正在进行残酷激烈的内战，政府强制性的规定每一家都必须出钱或者出力。亚当一贫如洗，想要出钱是不可能的，那么，他就只剩下阿比代尔可以“奉献”给他的祖国了。

　　二战中德军节节败退，但战事的失利没能阻止德军在他们的法国殖民地的大屠杀，相反德军开始了更加疯狂的屠杀。巴黎的医生于连（菲利浦•诺瓦雷 Philippe Noiret 饰）由于感到城里日渐紧张的气氛，他怕家人遭遇不测，于是安排了他的妻子和孩子回乡下暂避风头。
　　于连送了妻子回乡不觉已过一段时间，他决定回乡探望家人。孰料他回到乡下，看到的只剩斑斑血迹，残忍的德军对这条小村庄进行了屠杀。
　　愤怒的于连在村里的老屋内找到了一杆老枪。于连决定向德军举起复仇之剑！

　　她典当最后的家当，一个金十字架，他震惊于她的美丽，多给点钱，她不肯要。美女与押店店主，一个珍视灵魂，一个贪求物质。错配的婚姻，开场已知结局：她用死亡换取自由。往后是押店店主第一人称故事，苦寻妻子自杀原因但徒劳，观众如堕迷雾，他自圆其说，画面故事益发绷紧。她的神秘，是布烈松的留白，观众的解读空间。导演爱把演员变“模特儿”，本次找来真模特儿杜明妮桑德，不因为她美，而是看中她的声线，但桑德的静，有澎湃感染力。布烈松第一部彩色，令温柔添残酷实感。

　　一艘船停泊在布瑞斯特港，船上有个名叫奎雷尔的英俊水手（布拉德·戴维斯 Brad Davis 饰）。他被船上少校赛隆（弗兰克·尼洛 Franco Nero 饰）暗暗迷恋着，还和船长罗伯特（汉诺·波西尔 Hanno Pöschl 饰）保持暧昧关系；他勾搭当地酒吧老板诺诺（冈瑟·考夫曼 饰），主动在色子游戏里输给他以便和他发生关系；他贩毒，还杀掉了同伙，警察马里奥（伯克哈德·德里斯特 Burkhard Driest 饰）盯上了他，又迷上了他；年轻人吉尔（汉诺·波西尔 Hanno Pöschl 饰）也爱上了他，还被他嫁祸杀人罪名；诺诺的妻子吕西娜（让娜·莫罗 Jeanne Moreau 饰）也对他兴趣满满……
　　英俊的奎雷尔，狠心的奎雷尔，谁也说不清他到底爱谁，谁都甘愿做他手里的棋子，塞隆上校看着一切，知晓一切，每天对着录音机讲述自己的爱慕之情……

　　1949年的法国乡村，音乐家克莱门特（热拉尔·朱尼奥 饰）到了一间外号叫“塘低”的男子寄宿学校当助理教师。学校里的学生大部分都是难缠的问题儿童，体罚在这里司空见惯，学校的校长（弗朗索瓦·贝莱昂 饰）只顾自己的前途，残暴高压。
　　性格沉静的克莱门特尝试用自己的方法改善这种状况，他重新创作音乐作品，组织合唱团，决定用音乐的方法来打开学生们封闭的心灵。
　　然而，事情并不顺利，克莱门特发现学生皮埃尔·莫安琦（让-巴蒂斯特·莫尼耶 饰）拥有非同一般的音乐天赋，但是单亲家庭长大的他，性格异常敏感孤僻，怎样释放皮埃尔的音乐才能，让克莱门特头痛不已；同时，他与皮埃尔母亲的感情也渐渐微妙起来。

　　一部有关阴谋政变的豪华传记片，取材自1930年代法国的一个真实的故事。风流潇洒的主人公是一位法国籍俄国犹太人，他曾以诈骗罪被捕入狱，出来后改名换姓四处行骗，从事非法的投机活动，最终控制了全巴黎的新闻出版界、跑马场、政界以及豪华的社交场所。他还是个不折不扣的赌徒。最终丑闻败露，与之一起倒台的还有许多受牵连的政府官员。他在追捕中不得不自杀。而这一事件同时也暴露了法国政界的内幕和丑闻，加剧了内部派系的斗争，使得法国政府经历了一次严重的政治危机，差点就垮台了。
　　影片通过这样一个在上流社会靠行骗耍手段而飞黄腾达的骗子故事，来检视在那段经济不景气、人心彷徨的年代中人性的趋向和人的精神状况。中间还插入了苏联流亡人士托洛茨基来法国寻求庇护的内容，跟史塔维斯基组成鲜明的对比。编导目的在于暗喻法国政治取向的两种极端方向。桑德海姆的音乐恰到好处地配合了画面。

　　米歇尔（朱丽叶·比诺什 Juliette Binoche 饰）是个富家女，心里却并不幸福。她失恋，患上眼疾，情绪低落之下决定到外面的世界去流浪。她喜欢画画，在街头遇到断了腿的埃里克斯（德尼·拉旺 Denis Lavant 饰），画下了他抽搐的脸。克劳斯是个一无所有的流浪汉，却爱上了米歇尔。两人开始了热恋，流浪中互相取暖互相疗伤。米歇尔的视力慢慢模糊，她的心愿是在失明前看看博物馆的画。满街都贴着米歇尔家人的寻人启事，埃里克斯感到米歇尔即将离他而去，悲伤不已。他用枪打碎自己的手指以宣泄痛苦，疯狂的烧掉寻人通知，却没有留得住一段即将幻灭的感情。然而，米歇尔最后还是提出分手，重新回到她原来生活的世界。后来米希尔终于在飘雪的圣诞夜跟埃里克斯在烟花灿烂的塞纳河上重逢。

　　在一个不知名的南美钻石矿区，独裁军队要关闭矿井，遭到了工人们的武装抵抗。法国矿工卡斯汀（查尔斯·文恩 Charles Vanel 饰）爱上了矿镇妓女锦（西蒙·西涅莱Simone Signoret 饰），在被控领导暴乱后决定带着锦和独生女儿玛丽娅（玛西娅·吉拉东 Michèle Girardon 饰）趁夜乘船离开。镇上的传教士利萨尔迪神父（米歇尔·皮寇利 Michel Piccoli 饰）为了保护卡斯汀而被镇上人误会，只好一同逃亡。在暴乱中炸毁军队指挥部的探险者查克（乔治·马沙尔 Georges Machal 饰）当夜也来到船上，并强迫大家中途弃船，徒步穿越热带雨林向巴西逃亡。一行五人在蚊虫肆虐的雨林里跋涉，饥饿难耐，不断迷路，有的出现幻觉，有的因绝望而发疯。他们究竟能否脱离险境，成功逃离呢？
　　本片是路易斯·布努艾尔流亡时期结束，重返欧洲影坛后与法国合拍的三部曲中的第二部。

　　三个孩子的单身母亲雪(Neige)，定期探望住在养老院的阿尔及利亚祖父埃米尔。雪非常喜爱抚养她长大的祖父，视祖父为阻挡她父母毒害的家庭支柱。家庭成员之间的关系错综复杂，彼此积怨已久。幸运的是，雪的前夫弗朗索瓦用幽默给了她支持和依靠。祖父的去世不仅引发了一场家庭风波，也使得雪产生了深刻的自我身份认同危机，雪开始对自己的DNA产生了特别的兴趣。

　　Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
　　These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
　　Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
　　Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
　　Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
　　Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
　　Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
　　Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
　　Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
　　Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
　　Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
　　Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
　　Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
　　Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
　　Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
　　Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
　　Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
　　Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
　　Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
　　Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
　　Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
　　Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

　　伊莎贝尔·阿佳妮将重返荧屏，出演由路易-朱利安·珀蒂导演的电视电影《卡罗尔·马蒂厄》。这是阿佳妮与Arte电视台继2008年《裙角飞扬的日子》之后的又一次合作。
　　阿佳妮饰演的角色生活在一个职员饱受性骚扰之苦的社会环境中，本片也将致力于推动类似问题的解决。本片的制片公司是Elemiah films。

　　雅克·德米的第一部剧情长片，是一部没有歌曲的歌舞片，剧情描述法国青年罗兰，迷恋酒吧舞女萝拉。她是单亲妈妈，独自抚养着儿子，还痴心地以为抛弃他的男人会重返她身边。

　　卡米拉（诺薇米·洛夫斯基 Noémie Lvovsky 饰）和埃里克（萨米尔·盖丝米 Samir Guesmi 饰）相识在十六岁的碧玉年华，相知、相爱，一路走来顺风顺水，两人是朋友和亲人眼中的佳偶天成。结婚后，卡米拉生下了一个可爱乖巧的小女儿，一转眼，曾经的少年少女已为人父母。
　　时光荏苒，二十五年的漫长人生挥洒在弹指之间，随着时间的流逝，爱情之光日渐暗淡，终于，埃里克遇见了另一个令他心动的女人，他选择背弃了多年来风雨同舟的卡米拉。12月31日夜晚，当所有人都沉浸在迎接新年的快乐气氛中，只有卡米拉一人为自己落魄的生活而黯然神伤，而在一瞬间，卡米拉发现自己竟然重新回到了16岁那年，一切都倒退成为了青翠欲滴的模样，包括她和埃里克之间的爱情。重新站在时光的起点，这一次，卡米拉会做出怎样的选择呢？

　　一个曾经丧失人性的刑讯逼供者.在几十年之后接受电台记者的采访重新回忆自己那段罪孽深重的过去.他以前拷问别人,现在却接受这个记者的“拷问”.在这个下午,拷问的不仅仅是他本人,也拷问了人性,拷问了整个社会制度。

　　一个男人想和女友组成一个完整的家庭，但女友却无法怀孕，这位男性决定让自己来承担这个责任（生孩子），因为ta之前是一个女人

　　本片讲述导演自己的童年故事。一个9岁巴黎男孩因为母亲外出生孩子，在夏天被寄托到乡下一处友人家。这家夫妇虽然宠爱他，但各有怪癖，而且不停唠叨他们几年前去世的孩子。一个有男生性格的女孩使他从怪圈中逃脱出来，进而他也帮助那对夫妇克服丧子的痛楚。

　　Sébastien Nicolas总是梦想着成为其他人，不过他一直没有机会付诸行动。直到有一天，他开始观察、研究并模仿他遇见的那些人，并融入了那些人的生活中。Sébastien Nicolas的梦想似乎快要实现了，然而，有些路一旦开始走下去就无法再回头了……