戴高乐
177
3.0
HD中字
戴高乐
3.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:朗贝尔·维尔森,伊莎贝尔·卡雷,奥利维埃·古尔梅,凯瑟琳·蒙切特,皮埃尔·汉西塞,索菲·昆汀,吉勒·科昂,劳伦特·斯托克,阿兰·伦盖特,菲利平·勒鲁瓦-博利约,提姆·哈德森,尼古拉斯·瓦德,菲利普·劳登巴赫,克莱门斯·希廷,费利克斯·拜克,露西·鲁塞尔,维克多·贝尔蒙多,安德鲁·比克内尔,埃弗琳·布尔,凯斯特·洛夫莱斯,德里克·西蒙·罗宾,尼古拉斯·罗宾,克里斯·扎斯特拉
简介:

  1940年5月,法国在与德国军队的对抗中,陷入了被动的局面,可能会随时战败。查尔斯临时接到命令:他刚刚被任命为军队的将军并且需要立刻启程,前往战场前线指挥战斗。他不得不离开自己的妻子和三个孩子,把家人安顿好后,他放心地离开了。但一场战役打下来后,查尔斯感到十分吃力和担忧,害怕自己没有能力带领众多法国军人取得战争的胜利,同时他也担心自己的家人,想尽快结束这场战争,回到家人身边。在一次军事讨论会上,贝当一直对法国能在与德国对抗中取得胜利持有怀疑态度以及消极情绪,他主张接受希特勒的建议:德法两国进行谈判。查尔斯知道,即使谈判,法国依旧处于被动的一面,所以他主张继续反抗。而这时,查尔斯得知自己的家人与军队失去了联系,在逃亡途中,和成千上百个法国家庭一样,他们被德军俘虏了,是生是死至今不明。这更坚定了查尔斯继续战斗的信念,这不仅仅是为了自己的家人在战斗,更是为了守护法国这片国土,还法国人民一个和平、安稳的生活而战。

1725
2020
戴高乐
主演:朗贝尔·维尔森,伊莎贝尔·卡雷,奥利维埃·古尔梅,凯瑟琳·蒙切特,皮埃尔·汉西塞,索菲·昆汀,吉勒·科昂,劳伦特·斯托克,阿兰·伦盖特,菲利平·勒鲁瓦-博利约,提姆·哈德森,尼古拉斯·瓦德,菲利普·劳登巴赫,克莱门斯·希廷,费利克斯·拜克,露西·鲁塞尔,维克多·贝尔蒙多,安德鲁·比克内尔,埃弗琳·布尔,凯斯特·洛夫莱斯,德里克·西蒙·罗宾,尼古拉斯·罗宾,克里斯·扎斯特拉
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
249
4.0
HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
4.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:未知
简介:

  Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

852
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
父亲的荣耀
390
2.0
HD中字
父亲的荣耀
2.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:菲利普·科贝尔,娜莎丽·罗赛,迪迪埃·潘,泰蕾兹·利奥塔尔,朱利安·恰马卡,Victorien,Delamare,Joris,Molinas,Benoît,Martin,皮埃尔·马格隆
简介:

  《父亲的荣耀》和《母亲的城堡》是20世纪初发生普罗旺斯小山村里的温馨故事,这两部电影均改编自Marcel Pagnol写的自传体小说,讲述作者回忆童年时光的琐事,也叫《初渡艳阳天》和《再见艳阳天》。《父亲的荣耀》的剧情描述马歇儿一家人及姨丈一家在民风淳朴的普罗旺斯地区合租了一幢别墅度暑假,其间发生了不少趣事,令马歇儿深深爱上了这块土地。故事一开始介绍了这一家人的生活,爸爸是个古板的老师,妈妈总是担心马歇儿看太多书头会爆炸,而马歇儿偏偏成天找书看,甚至是菜谱,姨丈是个爱吹牛的公务员。
  本片系马塞尔·帕格诺尔(Marcel Pagnol)的童年回忆,改编自法国名作家马歇儿童年逸事的散文式喜剧,与《妈妈的城堡》均由伊维斯·罗勃特导演,是姊妹作。这是令人感到内心愉悦的成长喜剧,外景风光诗情画意。另外,普罗旺斯也就是《屋顶上的骑兵》的故事发生地点。
  改编自同名传记小说,经典的法国电影,在都市的喧嚣中体验法国乡村童年的温馨回忆。

230
1990
父亲的荣耀
主演:菲利普·科贝尔,娜莎丽·罗赛,迪迪埃·潘,泰蕾兹·利奥塔尔,朱利安·恰马卡,Victorien,Delamare,Joris,Molinas,Benoît,Martin,皮埃尔·马格隆
再一次初恋
189
4.0
HD中字
再一次初恋
4.0
更新时间:08月02日
主演:马修·阿马立克,让-皮埃尔·利奥德,友兰达·梦露,诺埃米·洛夫斯基,德尼·波达利德斯,萨米尔·盖丝米,文森特·拉科斯特,安娜·阿尔瓦罗,米歇尔·维耶尔莫
简介:

  卡米拉(诺薇米·洛夫斯基 Noémie Lvovsky 饰)和埃里克(萨米尔·盖丝米 Samir Guesmi 饰)相识在十六岁的碧玉年华,相知、相爱,一路走来顺风顺水,两人是朋友和亲人眼中的佳偶天成。结婚后,卡米拉生下了一个可爱乖巧的小女儿,一转眼,曾经的少年少女已为人父母。
  时光荏苒,二十五年的漫长人生挥洒在弹指之间,随着时间的流逝,爱情之光日渐暗淡,终于,埃里克遇见了另一个令他心动的女人,他选择背弃了多年来风雨同舟的卡米拉。12月31日夜晚,当所有人都沉浸在迎接新年的快乐气氛中,只有卡米拉一人为自己落魄的生活而黯然神伤,而在一瞬间,卡米拉发现自己竟然重新回到了16岁那年,一切都倒退成为了青翠欲滴的模样,包括她和埃里克之间的爱情。重新站在时光的起点,这一次,卡米拉会做出怎样的选择呢?

1880
2012
再一次初恋
主演:马修·阿马立克,让-皮埃尔·利奥德,友兰达·梦露,诺埃米·洛夫斯基,德尼·波达利德斯,萨米尔·盖丝米,文森特·拉科斯特,安娜·阿尔瓦罗,米歇尔·维耶尔莫
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫