35岁的中年外交家杰罗姆（让-克劳德·布里亚利 Jean-Claude Brialy饰）是一个具有深刻洞察力和幽默感的男人。即将结婚的杰罗姆，以单身汉的身份参加了老朋友奥罗拉（奥罗拉·科努 Aurora Cornu饰）邀请的度假之旅。在美丽而宁静的乡村庄园，奥罗拉介绍了两位花季少女劳拉（碧翠丝·罗曼德 Béatrice Romand饰）和克莱尔（劳伦斯·莫纳亨 Laurence de Monaghan饰）与他认识。年轻美丽的克莱尔让杰罗姆不能自拔地心生欲望。当他看到克莱尔的男友抚摸她膝盖的动作，产生了也要摸一摸克莱尔膝盖的念头。
　　由国际电影大师埃里克·侯麦执导的影片《克莱尔的膝盖》，是侯麦《六个道德故事》的系列影片之一。本片荣获1972年第29届金球奖电影类-最佳外语片提名等多项大奖。

　　故事发生在九十年代初期，彼时艾滋病肆虐，一个名为“ACT UP”的民间公益组织走到了公众的视线之前，其中汇聚的除了同性恋群体外，还有身患艾滋病等待着医疗救助的病人们。组织希望能够通过一些过激的社会活动来激起民众和政府医药部门的关注。
　　内森（阿诺德·瓦卢瓦 Arnaud Valois 饰）是刚刚加入了组织的新人，在这里，他结识了名为西恩（纳威尔·佩雷兹·毕斯卡亚特 Nahuel Pérez Biscayart 饰）的活跃成员。随着时间的推移，两人之间渐渐产生了感情。西恩身患重病，病情在不断的恶化，但即便如此，他还是积极的投入到了抗争的潮流之中。在此过程中，内森的角色从一个情人渐渐向照拂者转变，他对西恩，以及对ACT UP组织的感情也经历着翻天覆地的变化。

　　皮埃尔（皮埃尔·里夏尔-威尔姆 Pierre Richard-Willm 饰）出生于一个富裕的家庭之中，养成了花钱大手大脚的坏毛病。当他的家人们发现，皮埃尔一直都在背地里偷窃家族财产后，他遭到了家族的驱逐。不仅如此，但皮埃尔深爱的女友发现自己的男友不再像以前那样豪爽和富有之后，这个现实的女人抛弃了皮埃尔。
　　人生遭遇了重大变故和挫折的皮埃尔决定离开伤心地前往摩洛哥，在那里的一间小酒馆中，皮埃尔邂逅了一位神秘的女子（Marie Bell 饰），这个女人拥有着和他念念不忘的前女友极为相似的面孔，这令皮埃尔一下子就被她吸引了。但随着时间的推移，皮埃尔发现，这个看似单纯的女人，身后隐藏了许多的秘密。

　　Bertrand（Philippe Beuzen 饰）和Guillaume（Christian Charrière 饰）是巴黎医学院的同学，前者是个勤奋的穷学生，后者则是个父母经常不在家留下豪宅供儿子玩乐的富家公子。一次在咖啡店他们遇到女孩Suzanne（Catheri ne Sée 饰），他们都对Suzanne倾心，但Bertrand因为自己的身世并没有展开主动的追求，反而是一直看着Guillaume如何把Suzanne骗到手打得火热。花花公子很快便玩厌了，与Suzanne分手，Suzanne开始主动约Bertrand出来游玩挥霍，很快便花光了钱。而Bertrand的钱却被偷了……Suzanne是复仇女郎吗？

　　三百年来，一把红色小提琴在数个国家流浪，与数人的命运紧紧相牵。仿佛有某种魔咒，让人们为这把琴疯狂着迷。
　　小提琴的制造者，是十七世纪意大利的乐器大师（卡路•施齐Carlo Cecchi 饰 ）。妻儿死去，难抑悲伤的他，把爱人的血涂在小提琴上，从此琴就辗转流落到了奥地利。一个练琴的小男孩为了这把琴痴迷，直至倒落在舞台上。
　　小提琴的流浪从未间断，从盗墓者，到吉普赛人，到为之自杀的作曲家波普，再到文革期间上海的一位音乐老师。这期间，无论拥有者是否明白小提琴真正价值，都逃不出它的魔力。终于，有鉴别专家知道了小提琴的秘密——它的外壳染着三个世纪前一位大师的血和泪。

　　莉拉（莎拉·弗里斯蒂 Sara Forestier 饰）是一个有着轻微口吃的女孩，这种生理缺陷给她的心灵带来了巨大的伤害，班上总是有不懂事的孩子喜欢模仿莉拉说话并且嘲笑她，因此渐渐地，莉拉缄口不言，越来越沉默。然而，莉拉拥有一颗聪慧的头脑，勤恳踏实的她总是能够在班上名列前茅。
　　一次偶然中，莉拉结识了名为阿莫（何杜安·阿迦南 Redouanne Harjane 饰）的男孩，阿莫是一名赛车手，靠着非法比赛来赚钱。和莉拉的寡言不同，阿莫非常喜欢说话，总是叽叽喳喳讲个不停，两个性格大相径庭的年轻人之间，碰撞出了爱情的火花。老师在莉拉的身上发现了杰出的写诗天赋，在老师的鼓励下，莉拉开始将自己不成句的短语创作成为诗句，发表在网络上，哪知道一炮而红，追随者众多。可她和阿莫之间的感情，却因此而越来越淡漠。

　　内拉（卡梅丽雅·乔丹娜 Camélia Jordana 饰）的梦想是成为一名律师，带着实现梦想的决心，内拉进入了巴黎第二大学的法律系深造。从小到大，内拉都是一个非常优秀的孩子，个性难免有些高傲和桀骜，总觉得别人都不如自己。开学的第一天，她就因为迟到和态度傲慢等问题和老师皮耶（丹尼尔·奥图 Daniel Auteuil 饰）之间产生了矛盾。
　　内拉和皮耶之间的争吵被好事的学生用手机拍了下来，发布到了视频网站上，没想到竟然因为种族歧视的原因而在网络上掀起了轩然大波，为了解决此事件恶劣的影响，纪律委员会不得不召开了听证会。校长决定让内拉和皮耶参加一场师生辩论大赛。

　　丽莎（柯莱儿布翁尼许Claire Bouanich 饰），今年8岁，单亲，喜欢提问，各种各样童稚的问题。邻居的爷爷（米歇尔•塞罗 Michel Serrault 饰 ），儿子已经去世，脾气古怪，有收集蝴蝶标本的癖好。一天，丽莎闯进了爷爷的密室，发现了五彩斑斓的蝴蝶标本。爷爷还说，他要到山上去采集一个叫“伊莎贝拉”的蝴蝶，丽莎大喜，要跟爷爷一起去探险，她多么希望跟着爷爷去看满天飞的蝴蝶。一路上，丽莎给爷爷添了不少麻烦，因为她有问不完的问题，还放走了爷爷采来的蝴蝶。丽莎掉进了一个山洞，爷爷着急，找来了救生人员。两人的友谊、亲情，与美丽的大自然融为一体。

　　费莉西泰，拥有一颗简单、神圣、本原和终极的心，如同上帝创世之心。失恋后的她在寡妇欧班太太家找了一份佣人的活，但是无论她多么忠诚勤劳，却始终不能赢得女主人的信任…… 影片根据福楼拜同名短篇小说《简单的心》改编，并获得2009年雅克·普雷韦剧本奖的最佳文学改编作品奖。女主角由法国演技女王桑德里娜·伯奈尔出演，这也是她第二次饰演女佣角色，她以其充满野性和极富张力的演技，诠释了原作，即生命的精彩和人性的高贵。

为了满足对自由的渴望，泰迪决定远离喧嚣的世界，独自在贝加尔湖冰冷岸边的一间小木屋里安顿下来。

一天晚上，他在暴风雪中迷路了，被躲在西伯利亚森林里多年的俄罗斯人阿列克谢救了出来。

这两个人之间的友谊突然而又至关重要。

　　安妮（阿努克·艾梅 Anouk Aimee 饰）和琼（让·路易·特兰蒂尼昂 Jean-Louis Trintignant 饰）曾经是一对非常相爱的恋人，然而造化弄人，他们的爱情最终没有能够开花结果，两人落得分道扬镳的下场。一晃眼50年过去，已经垂垂老矣的琼患上了阿尔茨海默症，严重的症状令他连自己的女儿也不认识了。琼混沌的大脑里唯一记得的人，只有安妮。
　　为了缓解父亲的病情，琼的儿子安东尼（Antoine Sire 饰）想方设法和安妮取得了联系，希望她能够来看一看父亲，以解父亲的思念之苦。谁知道安妮同样对曾经的那段感情难以释怀，两人一见面，压抑在他们内心里多年的情感死灰复燃。

　　罗尼的女儿正要结婚，不巧的是泽夫正要为他的妻子举办葬礼。这一意外事件让已截然不同的两兄弟之间的分歧更大……在伦敦、巴黎、圣特罗佩与纽约之间，冲突、误解、背叛，将把这一家人炸开了，但正因这些争执与和解组成了这一部时尚爱情喜剧。

　　Voice 1 (male __QUOTE__professional announcer__QUOTE__ type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
　　These people also scorned __QUOTE__subjective profundity__QUOTE__. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
　　Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole __QUOTE__” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
　　Voice 2: __QUOTE__Our life is a journey __QUOTE__” In the winter and the night. __QUOTE__” We seek our passage...__QUOTE__�
　　Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
　　Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
　　Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
　　Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
　　Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization__APOS__s forms of language.
　　Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment __QUOTE__ordinary life__QUOTE__� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
　　Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class__APOS__s monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
　　Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
　　Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
　　Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
　　Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
　　Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
　　Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven__APOS__t changed anything.
　　Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
　　Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
　　Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation __QUOTE__” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
　　Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
　　Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

　　By 1820, Edmund Kean is the most admired Shakespearan actor. But if his art is peerless, his free lifestyle is ill thought of, particularly by the high society. Kean has fallen passionately in love with Countess Elena de Koefeld, the wife of the ambassador of Denmark. Elena loves him too but hesitates to give up her rank in society and follow Kean. On the other hand, Anna, a rich heiress who refuses to marry Lord Mewill, the husband chosen by her parents, confesses her love for Kean and decides to become an actress like him... The aristocrats, outraged by Edmund__APOS__s profligate ways, decide to boycott his performances and his career is broken. Kean does not recover from such a blow and, on a stormy night, dies in Elena__APOS__s arms.

　　1978年，红色高棉政权邀请三名法国使者—醉心研究马克斯主义的学者、一心求真的务实记者，和满腔热诚、爱抱打不平的摄影师，到柬埔寨进行国情研习，企图向西方说好赤柬故事。政党高层句句歌颂波尔布特崇高的革命理念，被安排游览的场所处处展示赤柬的丰功伟绩，却依旧难掩人民脸上的恐惧。三位使者在高压政权的监视下寻找真相，以镜头和录音机对抗紧随他们的军人和枪支，却不知危险正逐步逼近。第10届焦点导演潘礼德过去多部作品，包括入围奥斯卡之作《被消失的影像》均反映出他对红色高棉大屠杀的念兹在兹，今次以剧情片重演真实事件，回归康城影展，继续以其独有的方式念记柬埔寨这段血腥沉重的过去。

　　Vital, 40 ans, travaille comme chef d’atelier dans une usine textile. Il est choisi comme « cobaye » par Alix, 25 ans, venue réaliser une étude ergonomique dans l’entreprise de son père sous couvert d’anonymat. La fille du patron est rapidement sous le charme de cet ouvrier réservé et secret qui s’ouvre peu à peu à son contact et se met à rêver d’une autre vie…

　　1968年，电影导演让·吕克-戈达尔已经获得了太多的成功。 这一年，电影界前辈、法国电影资料馆馆长亨利·郎格洛瓦提出了整个电影史应该以__QUOTE__戈达尔前__QUOTE__与__QUOTE__戈达尔后__QUOTE__两个概念来划分的论点。在他看来，38岁的哥达尔结束了一个时代也开创了一个时代。 著名作家路易·阿拉贡早在1965年就已经说过：__QUOTE__今天的艺术就是戈达尔。__QUOTE__著名存在主义哲学家萨特也宣称：__QUOTE__在戈达尔的影片里，学问太多了。__QUOTE__
　　其实，除了处女作《筋疲力尽》获得1960年西柏林电影节最佳导演奖、《狂人比挨洛》获得1965年威尼斯国际电影节青年评论奖、《中国姑娘》获得1967年威尼斯电影节评委会特别奖外，戈达尔导演的其他几十部影片，并没有给他带来很好的声誉，大多数观众看戈达尔的电影，不是不知所措，就是焦躁不安。 或许，戈达尔生来就是电影的敌人。
　　在1967年拍摄的《周末》里，他让动作停止--两个倒垃圾的人直接对着一部摄象机谈话，长达7分钟之久。在这部影片的开头部分，一个仅仅穿着乳罩和短裤的女人，坐在半明半暗的一张桌子上，直接对着一部推近拉远的摄象机说话，详细的叙述她参加的一次狂欢。这个段落也持续了好几分钟。思想激进的戈达尔，用这种方式与好莱坞抗衡。因为在他看来，好莱坞电影流畅的剪辑和快速的节奏，是为了迎合观众，进而麻痹观众，使他们沉湎在白日梦中，甘心情愿的忍受资产阶级的剥削。他甚至认为，电影本身就是资产阶级的，要反抗资产阶级，就需要把电影的传统全部粉碎。这样不象电影的电影，才使值得拍摄的好电影。

　　Jenny是一名年轻的普科医生。一天晚上，在诊所关门后，她听到敲门声却没有开门。第二天，她听说警察在距离诊所不远处，发现了一具身份不明的年轻女孩的尸体。

　　瑞士导演弗里德里克·麦蒙（ Frédéric Mermoud）擅长执导恐怖片，他执导的惊悚题材电视剧《魂归故里》曾在法国大获成功。他的最新电影《摩卡》依然是关于一个犯罪的故事。艾曼纽·德芙（Emmanuelle Devos）饰演的Diane，儿子在一场交通事故中离世，而肇事司机逃逸。
　　在警方找不到更多有力证据的情况下，Diane 独自开始了寻找凶手的旅程，她唯一知道的线索就是凶手驾驶的一辆摩卡色的奔驰车。终于她找到了摩卡色车的司机——一位金色头发的女人。在与她接近的过程中，两个女人之间发生了更多关乎车祸之外的故事。而作为法国中生代演员中坚力量的德芙，也为影片贡献了精准而精湛的演技。

　　侯麦著名系列作品“四季的故事”之一。菲利茜（夏洛特·海瑞 Charlotte Véry饰）和查理（费德瑞克·范丹狄德夏 Frédéric van den Driessche饰）在海边浪漫相恋之后，因为一时不留神留下了写错的地址，而导致了二人再也找不到彼此。菲利茜生下了查理的孩子，但5年来却再也没有查理的音讯。
　　生活还在继续，菲利茜遇上了喜欢她的一些男子，他们也不失为好男人，足够爱自己。比如成熟体贴的马桑（迈克尔·瓦雷蒂 Michael Voletti饰）和才华横溢的路易（Hervé Furic饰）。然而，在菲利茜的心中，查理却仍旧是个挥之不去的至爱之人。她不是不爱他们，只是无法爱到能和他们一起生活。她和路易一起看莎士比亚的歌剧《冬天的故事》，为里面的人物悄然落泪，也许她和剧中人一样，也在坚守着一个信念。
　　终于某个冬天，菲利茜和查理竟然在公车上重遇，执着的梦想等来了实现的一天。

　　维里达是个摩登女孩，她在一家美容沙龙工作，沉迷社交媒体，也喜欢和朋友出去玩儿。但是她却要和一个父母安排的男人结婚。和她同龄的女孩一样，她必须遵照当地习俗，在婚前疯狂增重，因为在毛里塔尼亚旧俗标准下，丰腴的身体代表女性的美貌、魅力、财富和社会地位。婚礼将近，维里达还在催肥，但是她却开始质疑这所谓的标准，并试图找回她真正喜爱的人、生活方式，还有最重要的：她自己的身体。

　　能演善導的比利時全才導演卜力藍內自編自導自演的新作《末日前上路》，這回和法國演技派演員亞伯杜龐帝飾演一對賞金老獵人，他們在世界末日來臨前，和一對魯蛇情侶、自稱耶穌的神祕人物展開一場邊境公路之旅，不需滿街亂咬人的殭屍，陰鬱的無盡路途已盡顯末世的荒謬。影片宛如《黑色追緝令》的三段人物結構線，加上科恩兄弟的冷血硬氣，再注入比利時特有的冷調黑色幽默，一舉奪得柏林影展最佳歐洲電影獎、電影大觀天主教人道精神獎的讚賞。

　　人生中总是充满意外的相遇。爱画画的孤独女生卡蜜伊（奥黛丽•塔图饰），落寞贵族菲利贝尔(Laurent Stocker饰)以及生活邋遢的帅气厨师弗朗克（吉约姆•卡内饰)，本是巴黎街头的陌生人。一次偶然，却让他们开始了同室而居的生活。
　　起初的生活，有争吵，也有烦乱。但在相互磨合的过程中，三个人各自讲述着自己的苦恼，也渐渐成为互相的支撑。卡蜜伊不再孤零零一个人，菲利贝尔战胜自己，克服了口吃的毛病，而弗朗克关于祖母的烦闷也一点一滴的由女孩的细心而化解。他们，在巴黎的夜晚，上演温情。同时，也有闪烁在我们眼中的些许火花，名字叫做爱情。

　　一位绰号Bougnat（法语__QUOTE__煤炭商__QUOTE__）的黑人小男孩（Claude Amazan饰演）梦想参加夏令营。但是出发前一天，他才发现母亲没有为他报名。他感到很沮丧，希望想办法参加到夏令营的队伍中来。与此相反，14岁的萝丝（伊莎贝尔·阿佳妮饰演）拒绝加入到其他小孩子中，在集体出发前躲藏在屋顶上，但折腾一番后还是不情愿地上了车。 Bougnat想到一个办法：他改了自己的名字，跳上一列火车，假装是一个迷路的小孩，来到夏令营营地。在夏令营活动中，萝丝喜欢上了英俊潇洒的辅导员，而Bougnat在东躲西藏和各种恶作剧中也刷新着大家对这次旅程的认识......